#selective morality

[novaursa]

What gets me is they invent the SA for some women, but then remove the real canon examples like aemond taking alys as a hostage (the nuance there), or more about daemon grooming Rhaenyra or nettles. I'm so disgusted with HOTD.

C&H have a very strange moral compass, anon. They’ll invent trauma where it suits their self-insert nonsense, then erase the canon situations that actually had weight, consequence, and ugliness worth exploring.

It’s just shallow kink writing.

[spaceshipsandpurpledrank]

Black Christians takes have been so bad that they got me agreeing with Dr. Umar.

[theblackledger]

Visit Original Link

You know what's funny in a choke-on-your-own-bile kind of way? The same people who scream about justice, tolerance, and inclusion will turn around and spew the exact same filth that killed six million people not even a century ago.

Let’s not pretend this is subtle. The antisemitic rot is oozing up from BOTH ends of the political latrine—but it’s the left that’s really taken to polishing its jackboots while pretending they’re sneakers of solidarity.

From Ivy League professors blaming the world's ills on "Zionist cabals," to online slacktivists casually calling for another intifada like it’s a fashion trend—

The mask is off.

And what’s underneath looks a hell of a lot like the propaganda a certain Austrian artist would’ve drawn with tears in his eyes and a stiff salute.

Congratulations. You became the thing you claimed to hate. You fight "fascism" with one fist, while carving Stars of David into targets with the other. You speak in slogans and burn in symbols. You think your cause justifies your hatred.

This isn’t activism. It’s a pogrom with hashtags. It’s book burnings disguised as blocklists. It’s cancel culture aiming with crosshairs instead of discourse.

You’re not edgy. You’re not brave. You’re sick.

And history will piss on your grave for dragging humanity back into the fire it once barely survived.

[ribiq]

[pinkypoodle]

Women will loudly call out misogyny and act like it’s insane when boy moms or sisters with brothers get territorial and start competing with a girlfriend or wife. And fair, that behavior is weird. But the same energy disappears when it’s flipped.

Because when girlfriends or women start expecting a man to cut off female friends, distance himself from sisters, mom, and female relatives, or basically shrink his entire support system just to “prove” she’s the number 1 priority and soothe her insecurity, suddenly it’s not framed as control, now it’s “understandable,” “protecting the relationship,” or “boundaries.” 🙄

And the inconsistency is what makes it obvious. Some of the same people defending it would never cut off their own brothers, male friends, or family for a relationship. Well, some will but point still stands.

So it turns into this selective morality where controlling behavior is either “toxic and possessive” or “valid insecurity,” depending entirely on who’s doing it and who’s being controlled. 🤦🏾‍♀️

[ambient-entropy]

[oudeteron]

its rly weird how ppl will say "why do you hate [a specific group of ppl]" any time someone has an argument with an individual of that group... whats the deal with metonymy

It’s a great way toavoid actually reading what the person’s saying so you can demonizethem instead :)

[plumadesatada]

I promise it's relevant, but you'll only get why at around minute 8 or 9.

If you have 15 minutes, though, you should watch this in its entirety.