do you think the personnel working numbers stations get to pick their own callsigns or does an SO assign them? i couldnt tell you what leads me to this conclusion but looking at the list im guessing its the former
Getting Into Shortwave, A Reason To Do It by DLNorton
I'm 62 years old.. in case you were wondering. This is why I'm bringing this up for our younger readers on Tumblr (and Bluesky) because I feel it's going to be important starting next year.
This is it... and listen closely..
--Get into listening on shortwave.. and get into ham radio operation.
Yes, I know a lot of far right evangelical churches use this medium to spread their own brand of bullshit to the older generations and the few nutcase survivalists out there, but hear me out. Not everyone uses this medium anymore.. but it's stagnant as far as the left agenda is concerned, especially here in the U.S.A. It's on there, but it's far and few between. It needs to grow.
I listen a lot to the stuff coming out of other countries, and from what I hear.. they're talking about us.. Americans.. and they're right. We really do not give one f u c k about what goes on out there.. unless it's on our cellphones, and even then we pick and choose who we want to watch.. not listen.. and a lot of them are these pointless "influencers" which, quite frankly, helped to get D*n*ld Tr*mp back into the White House.
So why am I asking the younger folks to get into shortwave listening and get into ham radio operation? Because of Starlink. El*n M*sk basically owns Starlink.. and El*n M*sk at any time can have it shut down.. on a whim. Yes, there are other satellite communications providers out there, but as does Starlink, so does these other providers.
We need an alternative to fall back on.. and it's the old school method of communication that has been around since Guglielmo Marconi sent out the first wireless transmission of carrier (radio) wave morse code back in the very early 1900s. If M*sk shuts down the satellite systems and in turn, all the cell towers shut down.. which is funny because that's also radio frequency based (Thank you Hedy Lamarr).. we're going to be left high and dry as far as cellular communication is concerned. They did this on a small scale in San Francisco back in 2011 when BART shut down cellular service to those who were planning a protest of a BART police shooting of a homeless man. This created a lot of chaos since this communication was no longer available, and no one had a way of coordinating the protest. If they had simple FRS (Family Radio Service) or GMRS (General Mobil Radio Service) or even the old tried and true CB radios.. then they could still communicate efforts in this event.
Simple.
Why these? Because no one really monitors these frequencies anymore. Oh sure, the FCC has their own monitors, but do they also really hang on to every word? No.. they do not. I know this because I used to run a CB radio transmit station and the shit that goes on on those airwaves, you'de think the FCC would be cracking down on it.. but they don't, they have much bigger fish to fry like... Internet communications? Fucking LOL!!
Could the local, state or federal authorities jam all radio frequencies? Sure, but simple over the air jamming is a real military effort, and most municipalities, et al.. (especially local) do not have that capability readily available.. but shutting off cell towers by just one order..? That could create MAJOR chaos..!!
Also, the Internet can too be shut down with a flick of the switch. It's pretty much shut down (or limited) in North Korea, Iran, China (to some extent) and any other dictatorship, hell.. even Russia has it limited.. You think P*t*n wants us to know what's really going on over there? If Tr*mp gives the word, M*sk will shut down Starlink and any other Internet/cellular provider faster than you can say "KKKlandestine" or "Pr*ject 2*25" or "Punch that MF'ing Nazi asshole!" .. It's scary to think about if and when your eyes and ears get punched out or shut off. I panic when I can't find my iPhone.
Shortwave is SO easy to listen to. You can actually listen to shortwave on the Internet using any WebSDR site. SDRUtah has a good one. Google it, and give it a whirl. Now, it is on the Internet and the Internet is vulnerable to shutdown. So what do you do? Get a cheap shortwave radio and a length of wire, some batteries and tune in. Oh.. I say batteries because the electrical grid can be shut down too, like in the case of when Texas had that horrific snow storm back in 2021..? It completely FUBARed their power grid thanks to deregulation of the power companies, and ERCOT got "caught" with their preverbal pants down..? But enough on the Lone Star states bureaucratic fuck foul ups.
So the electrical grid is defenseless too.. which is why having alternative power sources is a good idea. But I hear you say, "God dammit dude, are you trying to turn us into these wack job survivalists you see roaming the Internet and other survivalist modes of communication?"
Not necessarily.. but we can use one aspect of their "bonkerz" methods and ideologies to at least give ourselves a little something to fall back on.. and why not start with listening to shortwave? It's simple to do. You can find any number of shortwave radios on the Internet (Amazon, eBay.. who ever.. Temu? *shudder*) at any price practically.
Now I have two shortwave radios, a Radio Shack DX-394 I got back in 1996 at a Radio Shack that was shutting down, along with a couple of inexpensive police/fire scanners for listening to the 2 meter bands and to listen to the weather band on 162.550 MHz. And I also have an old Halicrafters S-120 vacuum tubed unit which I don't listen to anymore since it's practically unsafe to use because of how it's wired for use back when it was manufactured back in the late 1950s. I did find a YouTube video on how to modify the old S-120 to make it safe, but it's a lot of work that I don't really want to get into right now. Maybe in the future I'll crack that old puppy open and go at it with a soldering iron.
Now the other item I mentioned was ham radio, or amateur radio. I do not have the capability to operate a ham radio.. not yet, I'm working on that. I'm going to try to get my "Tech" level license so's I can operate on the 2 meter bands. I attempted it back in the mid 1990s.. but got sidetracked somehow and lost interest. I'm kicking myself over that one still. *sigh*
Now, I say "Tech" level because there's actually 3 levels of ham radio operation (license).. an AI overview spewed this out on Google to give you an idea:
------------------
-The three levels of ham radio license in the United States are:
Technician Class- The entry-level license, which is the choice for most new operators. It allows access to Amateur Radio frequencies above 30 megahertz, and some limited privileges on the HF bands.
General Class- Grants operating privileges on all Amateur Radio bands and all operating modes. To earn this license, you must pass the Technician written examination and a 35-question examination.
Amateur Extra ClassAllows access to all the same bands as General class licensees, plus some additional segments within those bands.
To get a ham radio license, you must:
Pass an examination administered by a team of volunteer examiners (VEs)
Contact a Volunteer Examiner Coordinator (VEC) to request an examination
Pay any reimbursement fees charged by the VEs
You can stay at any class for as long as you want before upgrading. US licenses are valid for 10 years before renewal.
You can study for the exam using:
Study guides
Training courses
Question pools, which are normally valid for 4 years
Study tools from HamStudy.org
---------------
That's basically it in a nutshell as far as ham radio is concerned.
And remember,
CB radio and FRS are basically free to use, GMRS is free to use too, but you'll need to pay a $35.00 fee on the FCC website to register you and your family.. which is one basic fee (35 bux) and you're off to the races as far as GMRS goes. I forget how long the GMRS permit is to use.. but I think it's 5 years.. but I could be wrong..
So that's it. The take away here is, start by listening to shortwave.. and hopefully, the rest with blossom from there.
Be proactive as far as your communication goes. I know there's probably more I didn't touch on, but I know you're smart "young" and mostly woke people.. I'm an old fuckin' boomer, and I know some of my boomer peers are crusty far-right motherfuckers and they're trying to get the proceeding generations to follow their lead. It's up to you guys to take a stand and fight them.. and I hope this will give you one method of staying in touch with your peers when all else fails to deliver.
Had to turn off the preamp it was so loud tonight!
Before RSID: <<2026-04-18T23:01Z MFSK-32 @ 9455000+1493>>
Welcome to program 445 of Shortwave Radiogram.
I'm Kim Andrew Elliott in Arlington, Virginia USA.
Here is the lineup for today's program, in MFSK modes as noted:
1:43 MFSK32: Program preview (now)
2:53 MFSK32: BBC longwave 198 kHz will close
7:16 MFSK64: Testimony to Appropriations Committee about VOA
11:35 MFSK64: This week's images
27:08 MFSK32: Closing announcements
Radio 4’s Long Wave (LW) service will be closing later this year.
Before the service ends, listeners will receive at least two
months’ notice. We will also broadcast daily on-air reminders to
help everyone switch to other ways of listening.
Why the LW service is closing
The company that owns and operates the LW broadcast equipment has
confirmed that the system is reaching the end of its life. As LW
is an older broadcasting technology, recent years have seen a
decline in listener numbers, with the majority now opting for FM
and DAB digital platforms. Given these factors, investing in
upgrading the LW equipment is not considered a cost-effective
solution for licence fee-funded services.
Supporting listeners through the change
To facilitate this transition away from LW and ensure it is as
smooth as possible, we will be producing comprehensive guidance
on alternative ways to listen through our website and helpline,
outlining alternative methods for accessing BBC Radio 4 content.
Information for users of RTS electricity meters
Some older electricity meters use a system called the Radio
Teleswitching Service (RTS) that is carried within the LW signal.
This service is run by the energy industry, not the BBC. If you
need advice about replacing or upgrading an RTS meter, please
contact your energy supplier or the relevant energy regulator.
The BBC does not manage or control the RTS system.
Radio 4’s Long Wave (LW) service will be closing later this year.
Kim's note: The BBC transmits on longwave 198 kHz from Droitwich,
England.
Image: The Droitwich longwave transmitting facility in 1962. The
technicians are wearing ties! …
Shortwave Radiogram now changes to MFSK64 …
Before RSID: <<2026-04-18T23:07Z MFSK-32 @ 9455000+1493>>
This is Shortwave Radiogram in MFSK64
Please send your reception report to [email protected] I was asked to prepare testimony for the US House of Representatives Committee on Apporpriations, Subcommittee on National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs, which is considering the budget for the Voice of America for Fiscal Year 2017. Here is that testimony (submitted for the Record; I won't be appearing at a hearing):
Testimony of Kim Andrew Elliott, retired Voice of America
audience research analyst and producer of a weekly VOA program
about international media. I was employed at VOA
1985-2017.
This testimony concerns the United States Agency for Global
Media, specifically the USAGM entity Voice of America. VOA’s FY26
budget was $200 million. I recommend that it stays at that level.
Until March 15, 2025, the Voice of America was one of only two
news organizations in the world providing an independent news
service, supported by a network of bureaus and correspondents,
providing content in multiple (49) languages. It was supported by
a global system of radio transmitters and satellite transponders,
important when the internet is disrupted, as has occurred lately
in Iran.
The only other news organization with this combination of assets
is BBC World Service, available in 43 languages. Why not just
leave it to BBC World Service to inform the world? Serious news
consumers prefer to have at least two reputable sources of news,
to confirm each other and to add perspective. Do we really want
to rely exclusively on the BBC to report on America’s
international activities and domestic institutions?
Furthermore, the BBC in general and World Service specifically
have been experiencing budget pressures. This could reduce World
Service language services and newsgathering capabilities. The
world is in danger of becoming a news desert.
Chinese and Russian international media are also available in
multiple languages. They have some correspondents around the
world and increasingly sophisticated production capabilities. But
these organizations lack journalistic independence. Their product
is neither useful nor credible. Radio and television stations in
the developing world would prefer to relay the more independent
and authoritative reports of VOA and BBC, but if only Chinese and
Russian content is available, that is what they will use.
In the private sector, companies such as CNN and the New York
Times have extensive networks of correspondents around the world.
But their content is available only in English and a small number
of other languages. (Machine translations are now available, but
those of us who make use of this resource know that it can be
clunky and unsatisfying.)
Among USAGM entities, VOA is, or was, the only full-service news
operation, providing news about its audiences’ countries, about
the United States, and about the world in general, with
correspondents in all those places. In my decades of
international broadcasting audience research, I have rarely
encountered survey respondents interested only in news only about
one part of the world to the exclusion of the rest of the world.
The proportions of VOA news coverage can be adjusted to suit the
circumstances of the target country and of world events.
It is often suggested, especially lately, that the Voice of
America should specifically support the policies of the United
States, through commentaries and selective news coverage. The VOA
Charter, U.S Law since 1977, states that “VOA will present the
policies clearly and effectively.” The most effective way to
present U.S. policies is by way of news and current affairs
coverage, because that is what audiences are seeking, rather than
by something that sounds like a propaganda talk, which is what
audiences abroad are seeking to escape.
For the advocacy of U.S. government international policies, the
State Department has outlets in multiple languages. Its Share
America operation has content in eleven languages. VOA and U.S.
public diplomacy each provide necessary but complementary
functions, most effectively implemented by separate agencies.
Requiring VOA to advocate for US policies would create
duplication between VOA and the State Department’s public
diplomacy.
Also in the VOA Charter: “The long-range interests of the United
States are served by communicating directly with the people of
the world.” The “long-range” recalls the promise during VOA’s
first broadcast in 1942: “The news may be good or bad, we shall
tell you the truth." This means that the United States is
confident that its policies and actions abroad will stand the
test of time and the scrutiny of a free press. A complete,
independent and credible news service will draw audiences, and,
long range, support the international affairs of the United
States.
Throughout the world, the only way to achieve a government-funded
but independent news service is by way of a multi-partisan board,
insulating the journalism from political control. Only a few
uncommonly wise nations know the value of funding such a news
service. In Washington, this protection is necessary whichever
party is in control.
Well-informed audiences are equipped to withstand misinformation
and disinformation. Well and fully informed citizenries are
necessary to develop and to maintain democracies. They can resist
the schemes of dictators, terrorists and other global
malefactors.