How’s this for a theory for ya’: the far right wants people to work at age 12, or maybe younger, so that they’ll always be compliant, ignorant, scared, and easily replaced through the whole of their working lives.
9 year old girl carrying garments down Blackstone Street, Boston, Mass., to a Hanover Street home. She finishes 8 pairs of trousers a day and gets 8 cents a piece... Lewis Wickes Hine, 1912 (Library of Congress)
In many states (pick a news story) the far right is bucking for votes by enacting legislation to prevent abortion, ostensibly to “protect the children.”
In those same states (again, pick a news story) those legislators are enacting, or at least attempting to, laws demanding schools eschew teaching “woke” subjects--i.e.: they should stick to patriotic history (or no history--or art for that matter--at all), avoid anything to do with gender or sex that is not WASPy cis/het and promotes “traditional family values”--and so on, ostensibly to “protect the children,” and to engender “parents’ rights.”
Again, in those same states, legislatures are attempting to, or are passing, laws that loosen child labor laws, (listen to this segment from WAMU’s 1A) which would allow more young people to take on more hours--even overnights, or take on more dangerous labor. Ostensibly this is good for children as it teaches good work ethics, so it’s “good for kids,” while also being good for businesses given the so-called lack of employable people.
My take? By making abortion illegal, or very difficult to obtain, neoliberal thinkers and actors are attempting to increase the population of the people who are least able to obtain abortions or other family planning options. By restricting what is taught to those children when they reach school age, those young citizens will be ignorant of how democracy is supposed to operate, they will not question their “leaders,” and they will be pushed to become “good employees.” Then they will be allowed to start working at as young as age twelve, doing menial but dangerous tasks (loading meat trucks on the graveyard shift, for instance) when they are too young to understand that they could be seriously injured but are also so young that they don’t want to advocate for better so as not to upset their bosses and maybe get fired. By the time they’ve been on the job for a couple of years, they’ll be too tired to pay attention in school, and drop out--and so need to keep working, still ignorant of safety regulations or that laws exist (or used to) to protect them and keep exploitation at bay. In the end, they’ll be compliant workers, unquestioning of the overseers, taking what little pay they’re given, and completely unlikely to organize.
Bessie Blitch, 15 years old. Sewing curtains on machine at Boutwell, Fairclough & Gold, 274 Summer Street Extension. Lewis W. Hine. (Mr. Fitzgerald, Manager.) Location: Boston, Massachusetts, 1917. (Library of Congress)
In a generation, the top echelon of the population will have a huge worker pool to draw from that is not equipped to push back on unfair and dangerous conditions--and that pool of people will be living in conditions that are unhealthy due to deregulation of industry, unable to access health care, and easily replaceable since there will always be a line down the block of potential hires. All of which sounds much like the 19th Century.
I could work in something about fear, anger, right-wing media, and the 2nd Amendment, but that post would be way too long.