Did Meltzer say *why* he thought Okada vs. Omega was a six star match? All I've seen is just the rating, but nothing to say what puts it ahead of any other five-star-plus match.
When he was asked about it on Observer Live he basically pointed out he gave five stars to Punk vs. Cena and Omega vs. Naito, and this match was better than either of them, so “you gotta do somethin’.” Mostly he’s just said that the match “may” be “one of” the greatest in pro wrestling history, which is funny considering that he decided this match was one star better than literally any other match. Dude likes to equivocate.
He wrote that the match “featured nearly every element of a classic match, from intensity, crowd heat, tremendous psychology, off the charts athleticism, hard hitting, timing, innovation and high risk and dangerous moves.” He compared it to several other legendary long matches from the last 45 years, saying “this had most of the elements that all of those matches had, but elements they didn’t and really combined the elements they did better.”
This week on Twitter he mentioned this wasn’t the first time he’d gone above five stars–in June 1997 he rated Mitsuharu Misawa vs. Toshiaki Kawada “*****+”, whatever that means. I went back and found his review, and his reasoning is similarly terse.
I think it’s pretty tough to put into words what makes a match super-great. Like, which Shawn vs. Undertaker match is best, and why? It’s usually a lot of little things. Also, the star rating system invariably leads people to compare apples and oranges. Dave gave ***** to the first Hell in a Cell match and to CM Punk’s title win in Chicago, but I’d argue those matches have nothing in common besides being great. It’s tough to isolate any particular quality those matches share, that a ****** match can turn up even further.
Personally, I thought the Okada/Omega was excellent, but not singularly better than other great matches I’ve seen in the past few years, like Nakamura/Zayn or Undertaker/HHH at Mania 27 or that “Please Sign Cedric” match. I’m psyched about it, and I want to make time to see it again, but it just happened so I’m aware of that bias. I figure something will happen during Wrestlemania weekend that makes everybody forget about it. But that’s just it–matches of this caliber seem to be happening more and more often. Sooner or later the standards for rating these things have to be revised. Given that Dave’s been rating these things for so long, it’s understandable that he’d be among the first to decide his scale needed an adjustment before it becomes obsolete.