Why Management makes more money than labor
So, there is a common question which is fair of why capital is entitled to the lion's share of profit when labor puts more effort in and it's a fairly simple answer. It all boils down to the assumption of risk and that's the rub. Personally, I'm not opposed to workers getting more money and a direct share of the profits but, if things go wrong then you have to deal with the consequences.
The thing is, you probably do not want to have your average line worker making the day to day decisions in how the company is going to move forward. Sure, have people being able to say have more direct control over their schedules but actual business practices and decisions is a very tough sell.
It's why direct democracy is a bad idea because everyone gets a say and then they get mad whenever things go badly.
A compromise would be to include a member on the board or other governing body that either represents labor or mediates between labor. Because, representation both has rewards and responsibility.
Besides, this can be done in a free market where labor can band together and decide collectively to sell their labor and it already happens to a degree with unions. However, we also forget about the human factor and it comes down to are you motivated enough to do this and will other people go along with you?
I mean, if you have a nice white collar job or comfy middle management spot do you want to spend that time, is it worth it? Do my dues and unpaid hours negotiating really make a difference in the end or is it just a way to haggle for a couple more cents at the end of the day? Do I want to risk my spot if things go in a tail spin.
Besides, no Socialist nation has ever has had this dynamic in the first place. Under Lenin the worker organized factories were replaced by the managerial class from the Tsarist regime in order to boost efficiency, Venezuela, Cuba and China have party/regime officials managing things and having an unequal split because, do you really think that the average worker is going to have the same level of investment in the operations of a business, especially if you know that the job is going to be temporary or the owner is investing the majority of the capital.
I guess in the end if we want to have a more equal representation everyone gets a stake based on the risk they have if something goes wrong. If you're saying that it's not fair well, put some more skin in the game.

















