Home care workers standing in solidarity with fast food workers at Jack in the Box in Bellevue. FIGHT FOR $15!
seen from China

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Japan

seen from Japan
seen from Singapore
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Vietnam
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from United States
Home care workers standing in solidarity with fast food workers at Jack in the Box in Bellevue. FIGHT FOR $15!
On the "Fight for 15"
I know that the whole fast food strike/$15 minimum wage thing is considered a bold, risk-taking step for SEIU, but honestly, the street-level existence of the campaign is neither bold nor radical nor particularly exciting in of itself. This is not terribly surprising in light of what pretty much everyone knows about SEIU, but I think it does highlight how largely clueless SEIU actually is about what constitutes bold, risk-taking steps - or rather, either clueless or simply unwilling. SEIU's version of the Fight for 15 is not, repeat is not, a worker power movement; instead, it uses workers as props in a carefully choreographed drama that aims to pressure people in power into making the desired changes. In the short term this might actually have some success; here in Seattle $15 has, in a word, become cool, what with $15 passing down in SeaTac airport and with fifteen dollar's implicit approval via Kshama Sawant's electoral victory over a four-term incumbent. It's certainly not so easy in other places, perhaps, but it's looking like it might seriously become reality here. But what will SEIU do then? The FF15 is, in both name and practice, utterly one-dimensional; I've yet to see any real inkling of any goal beyond asking nicely for City Hall to make the legal minimum wage higher. It's also a little bit scatterbrained; is this about fast food specifically, or about all low-wage workers? I, for instance, make substantially less than $15 an hour, but my line of work (specifically, education work) is very different from fast food. Of course, fast-food workers are probably some of the worst off, but I think it's probably time to broaden the message here. The fact of the matter is that a general strike by low-wage workers is vastly more threatening than a strike by fast food workers; a lack of burgers might grab news, but it's hard to see the system being toppled by a shortage of greasy mystery meat. Of course, SEIU is utterly against anything that might be seen as systemic change; really, all they want is a nice content working class that pays dues to SEIU out of its somewhat-higher paychecks. What passes for "action" in SEIU's universe is tightly controlled march/rally events which invariably include speeches from grinning politicians and union administrators combined with a very small ration of pre-approved workers who can be trusted to say nothing in particular. There are always paid organizers to make sure the marchers never overflow acceptable bounds and to drown out anything that isn't on SEIU's list of exactly three uninspired, vaugely indignant chants. It's not that I don't think it'd be nice for workers to make $15 an hour; it's more that the FF15 has taken on such a superficial form that it will not, in its present form, amount to anything other than a wage hike. Raising the minumum wage does not fundamentally empower workers, to say nothing of the fact that it does nothing for large sections of the working class, such as undocumented immigrant workers, many of whom work frightfully long hours for less than the legal minimum even now. The Fight For 15 is ultimately distinctly un-unionlike; it's more a series of particularly vivid TV ads than it is a real strike wave. A half-assed one-day fast-food pseudostrike is really just pathetic.
So, that got a little crazy, huh?
Yesterday I wrote a little something about my life as a minimum-wage worker. And hoo boy! Reddit had some thoughts on it.
Mostly that:
I am an idiot who can't use Craigslist to find affordable, safe, functional housing.
and also that:
Working minimum wage, I should not have expected to have been able to support myself.
To be fair, I was 21 at the time. But also, the facts are these:
The way the rental market operates in Seattle means that minimum wage workers here (in the state with the highest minimum wage in the country) cannot expect to have their own place to live.
Which means that you either must expect to a.) live with strangers, b.) be supported by someone else, or c.) magically conjure up a job that gets paid better than $9/hour.
This is bullshit.
Because a.) my first non-minimum wage job paid me just $12/hr, which is also not quite enough but so way more than I was making b.) it's very easy to say, as an able-bodied white male with no extenuating circumstances that everyone just needs to pull their own bootstraps out of their asses and get better work.
We rely on minimum wage workers in this country, but don't seem to give two fucks about whether or not they can survive. We don't care that they have to live in ultra-remote places, or else places where their personal safety might be in danger (can you think of a single other time you'd advise a small female to just go online and meet someone and then GO INTO THEIR HOME? I believe not. If a girl moves to a city with some strangers to save money and then gets raped, is she asking for it by moving in with strange men? Discuss!).
In my story, I literally explained how I ate food out of dumpsters and considered being a stripper and was told I was asking for too much because I lived in a 200 square foot shithole with no stove or oven to speak of.
But anyway, thanks for all the pageviews, Redditors! Hope you come back for all the gifs and other opinions you'll probably hate.
And to those who found us and aren't complete dicks who don't believe in fairness or equal wages, welcome to the family. On to the next show!
All the love, ever,
--hbo
Why the wage strike? Here's some maths for you
Seattlish's editors are big supporters of a living wage, because we have all worked for minimum wage at some point, and we all know that it does not pay the rent, which is confirmed to be too damn high. But a lot of people seem unconviced that workers deserve more than $8 per hour (or, in other states, even less). In case you are one of those people (who are you? GTFO. JK, read on, please), I want to show you my own personal math from when I was a minimum wage worker.
When I graduated from college in 2009 (Official Slogan of 2009: No Jobs For You!), I couldn't move in with my parents, who are also, to put it gently, financially troubled, because they live in a tiny town with no opportunity. So instead, I took an unpaid internship at a local media outlet because it was a better opportunity that I would ever get again. I figured I would be able to find work in a bar easily.
I lived alone because I knew exactly nobody in the city and because I have a little dog. Could I have bunked with some strangers? Maybe, but it wouldn't have saved me much money -- room shares in Seattle range around $600. I'm also a 4"11 tall female who, again, knew no one in the city. Moving in with some random people (with my little dog) didn't seem particularly safe for either of us. I'd have rather paid out the nose for my rent than put my personal safety and my dog's safety in danger.
And living in the 'burbs was out of the question; I had to be at my internship AND my coffee shop job very early, when buses didn't run. I don't have a car. Each week, transportation alone cost me about $12 as it was -- and I was in Belltown.
Could I have taken a paid job to move here? Bahahaha, no, because those didn't exist. Especially not in my field (journalism and media) in a town where, at 21 years old, I knew no one. The job culture, then and now, mandates that most college or post-college students do at least six months of unpaid work, which is a whole other breadbasket of privilege that I don't feel like digging into. I couldn't do any interning in college; I was working in a bar to pay my rent there. Unfortunately, that bar experience in a small college town didn't translate. The only job I could get in as much of a hurry as I was in was one with a corporate coffee shop who'd hire anyone.
This was the best opportunity I had. So I took it. And in the end, it paid off. It was incredible experience that opened the door to every single thing I've done since. It was the right decision.
For that year, every week looked like this:
Monday: Internship from 7:30am until 3pm, possibly pick up an evening cocktailing shift at a very-sketchy restaurant, or possibly an afternoon shift at the coffee shop.
Tuesday: Work at Tully's (YUP!) from either 5:00am - 1pm, then go home and do internship work OR work at Tully's from noon to 9pm and go home and pass out and die.
Wednesday: Same as Monday
Thursday: Same as Tuesday
Friday: Same as Monday
Saturday: Same as Tuesday
Sunday: Same as Tuesday
I did not have a day off for nine months. Then, when I did, because of a holiday at the radio station, I used it to apply for another, higher-paying barista job. Which I did not get. Because 85 people applied to it. Here is what my monthly math looked like:
Rent and utilities: $850/month (the cheapest, shittiest studio in Belltown I could find on Craigslist with a week's notice to move)
Student loans: $300ish/month (they've since gone up considerably)
_____________________________
Basic monthly (not including food or anything else): $1,150/month of income.
In 2009, minimum wage was $8.55/hour. With taxes, that means I was making closer to $8 or less. Tips were less than $20/week. I was working about 35 hours per week, though that was with a lot of frowned-upon shift-taking. Tully's really did not want me to work more than 30 hours per week, because then I might want health care, which I couldn't afford anyway, and which covered almost nothing, including my annual trip to the OB/GYN.
So, $8/hr x 35 hours per week x 4 weeks + $100 in tips per month = $1,220 income per month. Which means...
$1,220
- $1,150
________
$70 per month left over.
To cover everything.
Food. Bus fare. Cell phone bill. Dog food (which always came before my food -- little dude is the best thing in my life, and never wanted for anything during this time). Medicine when I had a cold for two weeks. Toilet paper. Laundry. Every single thing. That year, I couldn't turn on my gas stove -- the extra gas bill was about $20/month -- so I cooked on a single burner. I didn't have the internet, so I did all of my work for my internship in the stairwell of my building, where I got the WiFi from the cafe next door.
Money was all I thought about all day, every day. Every day, this was what was going through my head as I was going through bakery dumpsters, looking for day-old donuts for dinner. Hoping nothing would break or go wrong. Hoping I would get enough tip money to even get to my internship. Taking on extra shifts every single place I could.
But because I was working (at least) 35 hours at the coffee shop (or the shady restaurant where I sometimes worked, where I had to threaten to sue to get a paycheck they owed me) and an extra 15 or more at the internship, there were literally no more hours in the week that I could be working. I just needed to make more money.
At one point, I had an interview with one of Seattle's finer adult entertainment establishments to see if I could maybe scratch up some extra money that way, because I was 21 years old and it seemed like a last-ditch possibility. I was told that the start-up cost alone was $200. I think I had $15 in my checking account that day. I cried on the walk home.
The point of all of this is not "poor sad me." The point of this is that this is the reality of minimum wage. Even if your argument is that minimum wage jobs aren't meant to be careers, or aren't supposed to be long-term plans, the fact is that they should at least be able to pay rent and put food on your table that you didn't steal from your employer.
This is also why tipping is important -- while most restaurant and bar jobs also pay minimum, when I was working behind a bar, I could actually make enough to pay my rent. Fast food and chain coffee shops don't offer that supplemental income, but they need to.
The combination of high rent and low wages isn't pricing people (both of my generation and of every other generation) out of the city -- it's pricing people out of opportunity. I was very, very fortunate that someone gave me a chance and a white collar job so that I could quit the coffee shop, but that's just not true for everyone.
This is the bottom line: Anyone who works full time or close to full time should be able to survive without needing to beg, borrow, or steal.
That's kind of what we're all about here, right? Working and making a life and being successful?
So if you see that your area restaurant or fast food place is picketing, please don't cross the line. Consider writing to your lawmaker, or your favorite restaurant, or your local media outlet to say that you support the right for workers to make a living wage, regardless of education level or any other bullshit. If you work, you should be able to at least get by.
You can afford to pay an extra 60 cents for your burger so that someone who works can afford to eat, right? Right.
--hbo
RT @POC4Progress Westlake Park #strikpoverty #829strike Is it really not even 8am? pic.twitter.com/LcRPmV9JHX