#supersexual

[fucktoyfelix]

It’s wild how often asexual people are pitted against hypersexual people and extrasexual people cuz the reality is that both extremes of sexual expression are marginalized for the same reasons. Sex in our culture is both deified and demonized, and if you don’t participate in a very narrow band of “approved” sexual behavior then you’ll be coerced, shunned, and punished. Asexual people and highly sexual people are allies whenever everyone involved puts emphasis on individual agency and respect for consent and safety.

[askfucktoyfelix]

So this is a general curiosity I saw you made pride flags for extra-, super-, and mega- sexuality and the general vibe of it is sex positivity and being sexually motivated and you expressed how you hoped one day they'd branch out with different individual meanings like bi and pan as an example to each other Following This I came across your posts about it all because I came across megasexual searching for an opposite to demisexual which in some corners of the internet is referred to an orientation that a person cannot form any sort of emotional bond implying a further deeper connection/base attraction to someone unless there's an established sexual connection/chemistry first (which the reason I was searching for any label with this meaning is because it's strongly how I feel) and while trying to search for more of that I found your stuff and I wanted to see how you felt if megasexual kept it's roots with how you presented everything but did branch out to that newer/different definition?

Ive seen sex educators like Reid About Sex and Sexplanations use megasexual to just mean what i described in my post. I think Reud possibly couned the term as well?

I'm open to it meaning something else. I personally identify with your description, i cant form romantic bonds without a strong sexual connection first.

I just use extrasexual because it reminds me of aliens and sounds cools

[itsasuperblog]

Superphobes mad today 😑

TW:// message with suicidal encouragement, bigotry I went to bed to this message:

Wow, what a lovely and perfectly reasonable reply to that blog 🙄 Honestly why that blog for that message? I’ve posted cheesy memes but that blog is my heartfelt explanation about common misconceptions about supersexualities. I woke up to see someone had posted this:

Joking about killing off a sexuality just because you hate them and think they shouldn’t exist, is some bigoted shit. That shouldn’t need to be explained though. The tags of this post also reference genocide. For good measure because the post wasn’t hateful enough.

This is the user, block to avoid extreme superphobia:

I wish all my fellow supers a great and superphobe free day 🖤🧡

[superluv]

Is Supersexuality transphobia?

Short answer: no.

1) Sexuality is inherently exclusive as a concept.

All humans have their own needs and perceptions that ultimately lead to a specific, fixed sexuality as well. Having a sexuality means they are attracted to something specific- and therefore do not experience that attraction or arousal by others outside that circle. Everyone reserves the right to sexual boundaries, and no one has the right to demand explanations for these boundaries.

2) Implications of calling a sexuality [ ]-phobic

If you believe that supersexuality is transphobic, you MUST also believe that homosexuality is misandrist and misogynistic. It is the continuation of the exact same logic and there are no two ways around it. As we know, this is a bigoted viewpoint as a person's sexuality is defined by who they LOVE, not who they don't.

3) Why calling supersexuals transphobes is deeply fascist and problematic

When you question the sexuality of others, implying their love has ulterior motives, this is a form of gaslighting, coercion and conversion therapy. However unintentional, it works to guilt others into dismantling their sexual boundaries for the benefit and sexual achievement of others. It is a demand which parallels fascist interrogation and homophobia. It is to assume that their sexuality is changeable, that it is simply a preference (a common misconception). Our orientation is NOT your sexual conquest. It is NOT your fetish.

Please feel free to ask any more questions on this lesson, and see ya around! 💗🧡🖤

[vanessavokeyradfem]

Show the world you're pretty fly for a bi guy (or girl) link in bio. Dm me for pw @superbipride #superbisexual #superbi #supersexual #superstraight #supergay #superlesbian #lgbs https://www.instagram.com/p/CMkmiPaLYGU/?igshid=12k24zn4s1tab

[holycannoli2020]

Superstraight pride flag icons!!

[your-fav-is-superphobic]

kOKI

iKokichi Ouma (DRv3) is Superphobic!

(RB: @deadfennels) (POSTED ON THE WRONG ACC SORRY JFDFJDKJDS)

[chaos-cubed]

Unfollow and block me right fucking now if you think “superstraight” or any variation of “supersexuality” is okay.

You can have reasons or preferences about not dating or having s*x with an individual trans person, thats fine, but saying you wont date any of them? Because you are upset they weren’t always the gender they are now? Ill fucking fraud your goddamn taxes. Idgaf, thats fucking transphobia. And trans people who support “superstraight” and all its variations have internalized transphobia. Through the twisted ass logic “superstraights” are using, maybe some people dont wanna date any lgbt members, not because they’re homophobic, but because they’re uncomfortable with the fact that they weren’t identifying with their sexuality from birth. And one final message for transphobes and people with internalized transphobia alike, if you’re transphobic, that’s a you problem. You work on that yourself. But do NOT make that everyone else’s problem, and do NOT act like you’re oppressed (you aren’t i dont care).