I'd really appreciate it if you didn't put "Meta" or "Corrections" on an already correct post. If you have disagreements or whatever, that's totally fine, but I don't want them on my post because they are misleading and I don't have the time nor the resources at the moment to address them. I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask you to make a separate post, yes?
Your post was incorrect in many areas and therefore misleading in itself. I made corrections. Don't make a "meta" post if you don't want your "meta" corrected, and I just skimmed the iceberg. A lot of what was included on Loki's powerpoints were wrong.
#so much wrong with this person #i should have known this would happen but y'know #i don't even care at this point #trials of loki is from loki's warped pov #almost everything from loki's pov was warped #you guys are so predictable but okay #can you hear the bias sing
As for the tags that you added, I call hypocrisy. Your original post was so terribly biased towards Thorki that I cringed reading it. I tried to be as unbiased as possible with my corrections, which is why I presented canonical evidence to support my facts. Trials of Loki is in Loki's point of view, which is WHY I used that excerpt as evidence of his feelings for Sif to begin with. He's basically admitting it himself.
But if you want to go ahead and disregard that, and therefore disregard CANON, you go right ahead.
