#there's no issue

[yanderemommabean]

Jason makes me thirty but I not his type dude, I'm fat af

thats an issue??? I’m sure Jason would still love you shut the fuck up you’re loveable end of discussion

[nidaimesenju]

/He'll give thoughtful hum, his hands shifting to behind his back./ You have all this knowledge, and a willingness to explain them to me. Yet I have heard you need help being convinced to be an ambassador.

Not you as well.

/That’s less of a grumble sigh and more of an outright groan./

There is a significant different between answering your questions here, and having to do so to The Uchiha in general. No convincing is required here.

[gyppygirl2021]

I was somehow not aware of the fact that liked and disliked governments in Civ 3 only apply to what AI civs will think of you in diplomacy. Well then

[pinkandbows]

I can’t believe the amount of mental gymnastics I’ve seen taken to call someone a pedophile for thinking it’s weird how obsessive some people are over the ages of fictional characters. Fanworks don’t need to exist in the context of canon and should be judged in their own context; we can’t assume canon rules apply and we can’t assume intent. Just because something would be ~problematic in a canon context, doesn’t mean it has to be in a fanwork. The idea of fanworks in general is to take the ideas or characters and adapting/transforming them into something else. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t, sometimes it goes dark places but that’s not inherently bad. Framing plays a big part regarding how ‘appropriate’ something is and I wish it would get brought up more.

tl;dr of this is that content needs to be judged for what it is; content containing x or y that might be ‘problematic’ in a canon context is not always going to be inherently problematic in the context of a fanwork, and even if it is, you need to take the framing into account: what point is the author making about x or y?

[fukkce]

.