Don't bother trying to debate with atasteofwaffles, she's just super disrespectful to so many groups including aces. Also, I just wanna say your work is amazing. I love rhetorical analyses and your logos and ethos are off the charts. Not to mention your complete control over your pathos, and your ability to see past the logical fallacies is amazing. All in all I hope you have a great day!
(Now that I know the conversation is almost definitely over, I can reply to this :P)
I mean. You do know what this blog is for, right? :P
More seriously: Like I’ve said in the past, generally speaking, the point of engaging with posts like that the way I do isn’t to convince the OP - usually, though not always, the people making those posts have made up their minds so strongly that they’re not really open to changing their opinion.
Primarily, it’s more about making the opposing viewpoint visible at all and basically performing for the benefit of third-party lurkers who haven’t made up their minds quite as strongly yet. (That being said, in a very rare few cases, I have actually convinced the OP of a post like that to change their opinion - which is a great feeling when I manage it.)
Secondarily, it’s also about trying to understand OP more than it is about trying to convince them - pointing out the contradictions and flaws in their arguments so that if I’m misunderstanding something or they have an explanation as to why it’s not a contradiction or flaw that I’m missing, I can learn from them. If I’m wrong, I want to know - if someone actually has a strong argument against otherkinity, I want to hear it and dissect it. If it’s strong enough, it should be able to stand up to my dissecting and criticism. So far, I haven’t seen an argument that does - but that doesn’t necessarily mean one doesn’t exist. I don’t want to become the person who’s so set in their opinion that they’re not willing to listen to other opinions and change their mind if they’re exposed to new information that actually does stand up to logical examination.
That explanation of my motives for continuing to engage aside - thank you! I really, really appreciate that; this is basically mental stimulation and exercise for my brain, and I enjoy debate and discourse very much when it’s anything resembling civil. I put a lot of effort into maintaining a polite, professional tone and focusing on logical consistency and factual accuracy over emotional reactions (which is not to say I don’t have emotional reactions behind the screen, just that I make an effort not to let it slip through into my words too often). I also put a lot of effort into being as polite and kind as possible so the discussion doesn’t shut down because I made the other person defensive and unwilling to listen. It’s really nice to get such detailed feedback, especially positive feedback.
...Tl;dr, I took one (1) conflict management course and learned a lot from it xD Highly recommend doing that to everyone who hasn’t already; mine was from The Great Courses and their DVD lectures.