thetrashyisttrash replied to your post “If You Do Not Have The Right To Self Defense, You Do Not Have The...”
@kasaron ok I'll be more specific. I wouldn't have to defend against guns. Also, because gun violence is the vast majority of violence, it's the one we should be focusing on. We can't get ride of knives or guns or pipes, because those are necessary. Guns are not or never will be, at the very least not in a domestic setting
(Side note, holy crap I hate replies they’re so hard to keep track of).
Again, that isn’t the only thing that my original post was about. If you’d like to discuss firearms, their defensive use, and the prevalence of defensive use of handguns, I am absolutely happy to do so, but the original post is not merely or singularly about firearms. It’s about two very simple assertions; that self defense is a human right, and that onerous regulation on the access to means of exercising a right is a violation of that right.
Do you agree that self defense is a human right?
Do you agree that onerous restriction on access to mean to exercise a right are a violation of that right?