SummerCalls vs. AutunCalls.
🔪Introduction 🔪
What scares me the most is the fact that people can't accept SummerCalls, even if it's already obvious. Guys who are trying to refute SummerCalls: Do you even listen to yourself? Your arguments are so narrow-minded that I want to cry. At the same time, using an argument that someone has already refuted is very stupid.
I respect your commitment to AutumnCalls, but this is not a situation where you have to fight to the death. The more you drag out the truth and lie to the fans, the more devastation there is in the fandom, isn't it easier to really listen to SummerCalls? If you are trying to keep nostalgia for the old parts with your perseverance, then I assure you that even with SummerCalls, the old parts will not lose their amazing meaning.
🔪The phrase "Summer job".🔪
Everyone finds fault with this phrase, they say, there is this phrase in the description of the first part, which means that it also does not make sense in fnaf 2. However, I hasten to please you: Summer work does not mean a way to earn easy money, as many people believe. Scott was indeed mistaken in the description of fnaf 1:
Scott: I really never knew about it
! In fact, this
is a rather special "typo"
made and inserted from
the time when Freddie
was not yet called Freddy
Fazber. For a very short time, the name
Freddie should have been
Freddybear, and that's probably
when I first printed it. I'm probably
I went back and changed other
parts of the description, but I skipped
this one.
So, you should not devalue the meaning of summer work, and you do not need to.
From this we can conclude that the phrase Summer work in fnaf2 has a huge meaning.
🔪Only Jeremy and no one else could hear the calls from FNAF2.🔪
Um, are you serious? Where is it said about this? In fnaf 1, Mike also heard the calls, even though they are recordings.
It's too childish to think that no one but Jeremy could hear these recordings. This argument is simply taken out of thin air and solely from your perception.
🔪The week before the SummerCalls confirmed🔪
I have no idea why people ignore the fact that TWB has indirect confirmation of SummerCalls.
Here is an excerpt from the book:
After the 1987 Bite, the restaurant staff
distributed tips on
how to slow down or
stop
the animatronics if
they attacked again. One
of the survival strategies
proposed at the time
was
to shine a bright
light into the eyes
of animatronics to
disorient them
and temporarily lock
them in one position
until they
reboot and
recalibrate their
software🎩
You ask me: dude, what does this mean? Yes, it means a lot!! At a minimum, this means that the bite occurred BEFORE the calls from fnaf2, and not during them, as many have decided.
This directly proves that what Jeremy has heard is just recordings from the summer. Since it is already known at the time of the calls about the tactics that spread after the bite, it follows that the bite was before the calls. This is a fact. Fact.
Another fact that I deduced from fnaf2: the calls could not physically be directly for Jeremy.
There is a fragment in TWB that says that after the bite, the pizzeria worked for at least 4 more days. If the bite had occurred during Jeremy's shift, then there would be a temporary discrepancy, since after Jeremy, the pizzeria closed a day later.
🔪If the bite happened before the calls, what is the Phone Guy talking about?🔪
The phrase of the Phone guy: "Stay close to the animatronics so that they don't offend the children."
If there has already been a bite, why does the Phone ask to be closer to the robots? He is well aware of the risk of a new bite.
I will not explain anything here, since this fact means nothing. We learned from TWB that the Phone guy imposed on himself that animatronics were friendly, so he did not believe in their sinister meaning until the last moment. For this reason, he could still force staff to interact with robots, even knowing that a new bite might happen.
In short, I am leading to the fact that this argument does not refute anything and does not mean anything at all.
🔪Cropped, edited fifth call🔪
Do you remember the fifth call from TWB that was edited?
You will say: oh yes, this means that only Jeremy could have heard this call. And you will be wrong again.
Do you think that the call was edited in order to adapt it for future employees? That's not so. Judging by SummerCalls, the call was recorded before Jeremy, and if they wanted to adapt it, they could have done it a long time ago.
So I think the recording was edited for a different purpose. For example, in order to cover up information about the search for the owner of Fazbear entertainment and about a vacancy for the night shift (which was mentioned in the original entry).
🔪"Screamer" Mangle as proof of AutumnCalls🔪
This is the most unreasonable thing I've heard from AutumnCalls supporters.
According to your version, the bite occurred on Jeremy's shift. Then why is the Mangle flying into the frontal lobe from the first night?
This is not evidence in your favor, it only further confirms SummerCalls.
🔪Calls can be recorded and scrolled to other guards🔪
We learned this fact from HW, where we hear calls from fnaf3. So, in FNAF 2, everything can also be records.
What am I talking about? All the opponents of SummerCalls say: what's the point of giving Jeremy old recordings intended for a past employee? We would have recorded new ones and that's it.
You are mistaken. In fnaf 1, we are given the same tapes, by the way, recorded a week earlier and also do not coincide with some points. Yes, there are moments, Mike actually left a call with the death of Phone Guy. This indicates that the Fazber company doesn't care what new employees audition for. So they could put old recordings for Jeremy, even if the plot of these recordings no longer makes sense.
🔪Summary 🔪
All that has been said has been said. And in general, I want to note the scientific part of theorizing: people often use things in arguments that can be interpreted in different ways. HEAR ME. A twofold, ambiguous argument cannot be used in refutation and proof.
In order to defend your point of view, you must use working arguments that prove only the side you are defending. If your argument can be applied to the opposing side, then this argument is invalid and empty.
