-/-

[bestkillerin87]

SummerCalls vs. AutunCalls.

🔪Introduction 🔪

What scares me the most is the fact that people can't accept SummerCalls, even if it's already obvious. Guys who are trying to refute SummerCalls: Do you even listen to yourself? Your arguments are so narrow-minded that I want to cry. At the same time, using an argument that someone has already refuted is very stupid.

I respect your commitment to AutumnCalls, but this is not a situation where you have to fight to the death. The more you drag out the truth and lie to the fans, the more devastation there is in the fandom, isn't it easier to really listen to SummerCalls? If you are trying to keep nostalgia for the old parts with your perseverance, then I assure you that even with SummerCalls, the old parts will not lose their amazing meaning.

🔪The phrase "Summer job".🔪

Everyone finds fault with this phrase, they say, there is this phrase in the description of the first part, which means that it also does not make sense in fnaf 2. However, I hasten to please you: Summer work does not mean a way to earn easy money, as many people believe. Scott was indeed mistaken in the description of fnaf 1:

Scott: I really never knew about it

! In fact, this

is a rather special "typo"

made and inserted from

the time when Freddie

was not yet called Freddy

Fazber. For a very short time, the name

Freddie should have been

Freddybear, and that's probably

when I first printed it. I'm probably

I went back and changed other

parts of the description, but I skipped

this one.

So, you should not devalue the meaning of summer work, and you do not need to.

From this we can conclude that the phrase Summer work in fnaf2 has a huge meaning.

🔪Only Jeremy and no one else could hear the calls from FNAF2.🔪

Um, are you serious? Where is it said about this? In fnaf 1, Mike also heard the calls, even though they are recordings.

It's too childish to think that no one but Jeremy could hear these recordings. This argument is simply taken out of thin air and solely from your perception.

🔪The week before the SummerCalls confirmed🔪

I have no idea why people ignore the fact that TWB has indirect confirmation of SummerCalls.

Here is an excerpt from the book:

After the 1987 Bite, the restaurant staff

distributed tips on

how to slow down or

stop

the animatronics if

they attacked again. One

of the survival strategies

proposed at the time

was

to shine a bright

light into the eyes

of animatronics to

disorient them

and temporarily lock

them in one position

until they

reboot and

recalibrate their

software🎩

You ask me: dude, what does this mean? Yes, it means a lot!! At a minimum, this means that the bite occurred BEFORE the calls from fnaf2, and not during them, as many have decided.

This directly proves that what Jeremy has heard is just recordings from the summer. Since it is already known at the time of the calls about the tactics that spread after the bite, it follows that the bite was before the calls. This is a fact. Fact.

Another fact that I deduced from fnaf2: the calls could not physically be directly for Jeremy.

There is a fragment in TWB that says that after the bite, the pizzeria worked for at least 4 more days. If the bite had occurred during Jeremy's shift, then there would be a temporary discrepancy, since after Jeremy, the pizzeria closed a day later.

🔪If the bite happened before the calls, what is the Phone Guy talking about?🔪

The phrase of the Phone guy: "Stay close to the animatronics so that they don't offend the children."

If there has already been a bite, why does the Phone ask to be closer to the robots? He is well aware of the risk of a new bite.

I will not explain anything here, since this fact means nothing. We learned from TWB that the Phone guy imposed on himself that animatronics were friendly, so he did not believe in their sinister meaning until the last moment. For this reason, he could still force staff to interact with robots, even knowing that a new bite might happen.

In short, I am leading to the fact that this argument does not refute anything and does not mean anything at all.

🔪Cropped, edited fifth call🔪

Do you remember the fifth call from TWB that was edited?

You will say: oh yes, this means that only Jeremy could have heard this call. And you will be wrong again.

Do you think that the call was edited in order to adapt it for future employees? That's not so. Judging by SummerCalls, the call was recorded before Jeremy, and if they wanted to adapt it, they could have done it a long time ago.

So I think the recording was edited for a different purpose. For example, in order to cover up information about the search for the owner of Fazbear entertainment and about a vacancy for the night shift (which was mentioned in the original entry).

🔪"Screamer" Mangle as proof of AutumnCalls🔪

This is the most unreasonable thing I've heard from AutumnCalls supporters.

According to your version, the bite occurred on Jeremy's shift. Then why is the Mangle flying into the frontal lobe from the first night?

This is not evidence in your favor, it only further confirms SummerCalls.

🔪Calls can be recorded and scrolled to other guards🔪

We learned this fact from HW, where we hear calls from fnaf3. So, in FNAF 2, everything can also be records.

What am I talking about? All the opponents of SummerCalls say: what's the point of giving Jeremy old recordings intended for a past employee? We would have recorded new ones and that's it.

You are mistaken. In fnaf 1, we are given the same tapes, by the way, recorded a week earlier and also do not coincide with some points. Yes, there are moments, Mike actually left a call with the death of Phone Guy. This indicates that the Fazber company doesn't care what new employees audition for. So they could put old recordings for Jeremy, even if the plot of these recordings no longer makes sense.

🔪Summary 🔪

All that has been said has been said. And in general, I want to note the scientific part of theorizing: people often use things in arguments that can be interpreted in different ways. HEAR ME. A twofold, ambiguous argument cannot be used in refutation and proof.

In order to defend your point of view, you must use working arguments that prove only the side you are defending. If your argument can be applied to the opposing side, then this argument is invalid and empty.

[bestkillerin87]

Hello, and let's talk about SummerCalls again. I don't really like this formulation of the theory, so if no one minds, I'll just call it tapes/recordings. (Not to mention the name Ralph, which I still can't come to terms with).

In this post, I'll cover the problems with this theory and ways to solve it in more detail. Enjoy reading.

To all who are against it.

There are very few people who believe in the recordings, so it's hard for them to defend their point of view. This is my opinion, but it seems to me that the commentators who refute the Tapes are writing the same thing, just in different words: they say that what happens in the second part matches Phone Guy's words, which means the Tapes are nonsense. But they are missing the facts that refute the autumn calls.

What do I think about the "stumbling blocks" of both disputing sides? No matter how hard SummerCalls' enemies try, there are still arguments against them. Let me rephrase: contrary to what Scott intended, SummerCalls did pop up, and not out of nowhere. Even if Scott intended autumn calls, he ended up getting the opposite. There's nothing we can do about it, so let's move on.

Evidence.

1. The animatronics couldn't bite Jeremy. Fritz calmly adjusts their AI, while remaining unharmed.

2. It's not a fact that the pizzeria closed specifically because of the bite. Malfunctions can mean anything, and Phone Guy's words in any time, either autumn or summer, tell of the pizzeria closing due to an INVESTIGATION: "Okay, so to inform you, we're, uh, conducting an investigation here. We may have to close for a few days..." No specific mention of the bite.

3. Phone Guy mentioned that the bite was "provoked", and maybe if he had told Jeremy to stand next to the animatronics and get bitten, he might have shown more remorse or guilt.

4. The call on the fifth night in twb was taken as proof that only Jeremy could have heard this call. Why did a phone call from another building (fnaf2) end up in the new twb phone system? Because it's the same system. Phone Guy himself said that this was a RECORDING for new employees. Plus, he shows an even earlier call he made before the events of fnaf 2, which proves that all the recordings go to the same phone system.

5. The pizzeria fnaf 2 reopened several times, and the toy ones existed even before the events of the second part. In the mini-game save them we see a fnaf 2 location with dead children. It is logical to assume that at the time of save them there were already souls in the Withereds, since the puppet calls Freddy to save someone. But who to save? New dead children. Probably, this group of children moved into the toys, since in save them they were already standing on the stage. And since this mini-game takes place BEFORE fnaf 2 and in its location, it means that the fnaf 2 restaurant was earlier in the summer, closed and then reopened its doors in November 1987. This explains why the toys are possessed from the first night, although Phone Guy, in calls, will say this only on the fourth. If we assume such an outcome of events, it turns out that after the murder of 1985, the company understood that no one would come to them, so by the summer of 1987 they assembled new toy robots and installed a criminal recognition system in them, placing the toys in the fnaf 2 restaurant. But the system did not work, and the murder happened again. And the bite of 87 could have happened to him. Just remember the initial fnaf 2 newspaper: it only says about the GRAND REOPENING of the vintage (in whatever sense that sounds) pizzeria. If the company wanted to assure that this time there would be no murders, it would have been written in the initial newspaper that now, in addition to the grand reopening, they have also improved security. But in our newspaper we see only information about the reopening. This means that the implementation of the recognition system was before the events of fnaf2, and since Phone Guy had just spoken about it in fnaf2, therefore, his calls are recordings.

In addition, let's remember that the last newspaper talking about the closure did not mention the bite, but only malfunctions. From this we can conclude that all the newspapers in fnaf 2 really go along with fnaf 2, but they do not talk about the bite, and do not refute SummerCalls. And if you look at these newspapers, you can see with the naked eye that except for the "week of work" there is not a single refutation of SummerCalls. There are no clear indications about the bite, and what a bite, even the possibility of murder between nights was not mentioned.

6. In the description of fnaf 1 there is a phrase Summer Job, although there, Schmidt works in November. But this does not refute anything in fnaf2: Scott said that in fnaf 1 the description is already old and does not make sense.

7. When did the bite actually happen? What we know so far is that the bite happened in 1987. However, other information has now come to light. The twb says, “After the 87 bite, employees were spreading tips around the restaurant on how to slow down or stop the animatronics if they attacked again. You put an end to those harmful rumors by earning the title of Employee of the Month once again.” This time, the prize was a special pizza named after you for thirty days. However, it turned out not to be popular and only lasted four days; it turned out that no one wanted to buy a pizza called "Wreck-It Ralph" covered in anchovies and artichokes."

This causes some problems if Jeremy was bitten during the day shift. According to the newspaper, FNAF 2 closed after 6 AM. But if FNAF2 closed permanently after 6 AM, there is no way the restaurant would be open for 4 days after the bite if the bite occurred in November. Of course, this fact from twb proves that the bite occurred before FNAF 2, in the summer.

8. Jeremy interacts with the newspapers: he circles the initial newspaper in FNAF 2, then reads the last newspaper with his receipt on it. This last newspaper, dated after 6 AM, indicates that the pizzeria is closed. However, if Jeremy was bitten, he was in the hospital and would not have been able to read the news about the closing, much less get his receipt.

9. After the "Bite of '87", restaurant staff distributed tips on how to slow down or stop the animatronics if they attacked again.

One survival strategy suggested at the time was to shine a bright light in the animatronics' eyes to disorient them and temporarily freeze them in one position until they rebooted and recalibrated their software.

This means that Ralph learned about using flashlights on the animatronics AFTER the Bite of '87, as he recalls it being distributed after the Bite.

10. Jeremy's Role. Stop making Jeremy the bite victim just because Jeremy is uninteresting otherwise. This is not a rebuttal to Cassette.

The "Bite of '87" was originally a plot device to explain why the animatronics stopped walking. Besides victim 87, Jeremy may have other equally interesting roles, like the bully in Bonnie's mask, the father of one of the murdered children.

11. Some, after reading the week before, stopped at the fact Phone Guy had never worked before 1992. But this is not true. In the same twb it is said that he had previously been a daytime security guard before the company offered him to move to the night one, in fnaf1.

Refutations.

1. With the phrase summer job in fnaf 2, Scott could simply ridicule the old description of fnaf 1.

That's all for now. I will return to this topic again, because I believe in Summer Calls.

[bestkillerin87]

WE HAPPY RESTAURANT

Manager theory:

Probably, many people are interested in the question, is our zombie manager running this whole company, or is there someone behind him and running it? Who is the manager really?

To begin with, you can look at it from a logical point of view: there are many stitches and scars on him, and this is evidence that he is not alive. Usually such people become after accidental cases, that is, not quite intentionally.

"A zombie is a fantastically animated corpse or a zombified living person who has completely lost control of himself and his body, or obeys someone's orders, or is infected with a so—called "zombie" infection. In a figurative sense, this word can mean an obsessed person who is strongly influenced by any beliefs, hobbies or destructive cult."Zombies, for example, are people who were once normal, but circumstances turned out differently. They are not born.

Or maybe a revenant manager?

Revenants are individuals, usually people who have died and been resurrected by necromancers. The process is a complex biological, magical and mechanical one that must be completed no more than twelve hours after the expiration date of the object.

The legal definition of a Revenant is: any sentient being brought back from death to life by magical, biological, and mechanical means. Unintelligent creatures brought back to life are usually referred to simply as "undead" or "zombies".

Revenants are often called losers, undead, corpses, dolls, zombies, in other words, alive, previously deceased.

Interesting fact:

Most Revenants have a “seam” located on the front of the body, usually in the form of a surgical y-shaped incision that can only be seen through a lens. This seam can be opened by a necromancer or mechanic so that he or she can perform the necessary maintenance on the Revenant. More detailed information about physiology is provided below, although it should be borne in mind that these are generalizations, and they do not necessarily apply to every Revenant.

Blood circulation: As mentioned earlier, all functional revenants have some kind of blood circulation. Sometimes it's their real blood, but more often it's another chemical compound. Oil is not uncommon.

Digestion and Excretion: Most Revenants do not need food or water; their energy is generated through a resistance mechanism. In fact, many Revenants simply cannot process nutrients like living beings. It is not unusual for the digestive tract and/or excretory organs to be completely removed.

The psyche and personalities of Revenants are as colorful and diverse as the living beings they once were, however, there are some common patterns of thinking and behavior that have been observed in Revenants. The most notable of these is that a large number of Revenants partially lose their desire for autonomy and self-government after resurrection; many are quite content to submit to someone else. This does not mean that they do not have free will or are always easy to control or manipulate, it's just that their desire for independence has generally decreased.

So, it's time to compare zombies and the revenant, relying on the manager.

1). Zombies. Perhaps the manager is really a zombie, but does not realize this, since he has been under control for a long time. Most often, zombies are infected. Most likely, someone fed the still-alive manager toxic burgers, which caused the manager to die, but some substance in this food brought him back to life, but his mind was intercepted by someone. Or.. Intercepted by the same substance from food, if it is alive. This can be explained by the fact that customers worry after consuming toxic substances, but not as much as an adequate person would worry. Substances can get the better of the mind and convince them that everything is fine, but the sober part of their brain tells them: "run for treatment!".

The same story can happen to a manager: he ate unhealthy food, and some substances convinced him that everything was fine. He ignored the possibility of his own death and became a corpse, becoming inanimate, in submission.

However, there is a catch in the zombie theory: most often zombies are more fragile and not as healthy as Revenants. They usually have no hair, and overall their appearance looks less healthy. But our manager looks pretty decent (unless he's wearing a wig.. and it doesn't powder..). But this does not mean that the manager is a zombie, because zombies are easy to break, because they literally hold on to tendons and bones, and the manager clearly faced a job of an average physical level. + in general, the zombie psyche is mainly focused on survival and eating, since zombies are always hungry. But our manager is sitting in his office and does not need food.

The theory of mind-grabbing substances is very interesting and logical, but outwardly our manager does not look like a zombie under absolute control.

Let's move on to the next option.

2). The Revenant. A Revenant is a creature created by a necromancer from a corpse. Now let's also draw an analogy between him and the manager.

Revenants are more intelligent and rational than zombies. The manager has shown that he is able to communicate in the ordinary language of people, has a sense of humor and, in principle, follows what he says, while a zombie cannot think like that.

Speaking of seams, the manager has an even seam on his neck and seams on his arms. Stitches on the arm may mean that they are being opened to balance blood flow, which is necessary for revenants. As mentioned earlier, Revenant creators can open seams to fix problems. And there may be oil instead of blood. The manager mentioned that customers drink butter, but he doesn't care as long as they pay. Since the oil CAN get into him, he may be indifferent to those who complain about the oil in the products.

I quote from what was said earlier, so as not to return to the above: "The most remarkable of them is that a large number of Revenants after resurrection partially lose their desire for autonomy and self-government; many are quite satisfied with subordination to someone else. This does not mean that they do not have free will or that they are always easy to control, it's just that their desire for independence has generally decreased." Although our manager runs the restaurant, he does it without much enthusiasm. He speaks ironically about machine and products, but does not want to take responsibility for everything he does, and takes everyone to the hospital. A manager may be under someone's influence, which controls the entire business beyond measure.

In addition to these options, other methods of resurrection are not excluded, such as self-healing with the help of future plans, freezing of the body, human agony and treatment of the cadaverous body with any substances. I have given the main ways and types of deceased people that first come to mind.

There is no clear answer to the question of whether someone manages the manager, or he manages the company and the business himself. The psyche of Revenants can be completely different from the typical description, so a lack of enthusiasm may be a trait of our manager's character. Only from a zombie point of view, the manager has his own manager "in the shadows". It is also possible that the manager is indeed the owner of the company, but he has his own person who atones for sins in his business.

The dude with the camera standing at the entrance may be a friend of the manager, because from time to time he says "hi, bro!" if he addresses the manager. The camera is also similar to the description of the revenant – a corpse with machine parts. His head could have been replaced with a camera due to the lack of eyes in the corpse. Perhaps he is a colleague of the manager or someone who puts things in order in the business. But I doubt that he is actively involved in the management of the company in any way, because he stands and watches all day. So it's unlikely that he's cleaning anything up.

Well, it was a little theory about the essence of a manager and his role in business. You can theorize about the rest as much as you like, about secretaries and clients, but more on that later.

[bestkillerin87]

Akira and Vincent are the same person

I want to confirm this theory with my theory.

Firstly, Akira and Vincent wear the same jacket. Both have a fetish for strangling with a wire and pressing on the bones with a foot. They have gray eyes and problems with aggression. And Vincent got into an accident, and that's why his memory disappeared, and he doesn't remember that he was Akira. Vincent said Akira disappeared after the accident, well, obviously he's Vincent now. Besides, Sano came to Vincent for a reason: he wanted his ex-brother to remember everything. Akira and Sano previously had a passionate relationship, and when Sano came to Vincent after losing Akira, Sano blushed. I don't think he could blush because of someone else's man, Sano is not like that.

And my theory

is that when we play at Vincent's, he gets into a fighting stance before killing the MC. The MC notices that she has seen this rack before. So, Akira also made such a stand in game to also knock out the MC's teeth. I think that the MC said about the rack for a reason, but to hint that Vincent and Akira are the same thing. I doubt Vince and MC have seen each other before, and he could be standing somewhere in this position. In short, it's a paradox. For example, after Akira knocked out her teeth, she died, and then came to life again in Vincent's basement, she says she remembers such a stand. It seems to me that this does not mean that the MC knows how to be reborn after death. It's just a hint.

You can tell they have a different character. In fact, it doesn't matter, because a person who has forgotten the past probably missed the moments that could affect his character. Akira is honest, brash and aggressive. Vincent is more gentle and ferocious, more patient than Akira. Most likely, after the accident, Vincent revised his life and just sort of reset himself to factory settings. He began to look at the world the way his pure mind looks, which is not aware of past moments.

If I'm wrong about something, you can correct me. But I think the emphasis on Vincent's pose was made for a reason.

RUS

Акира и Винсент — один и тот же человек.

Я хочу подтвердить эту теорию своей теорией. Во-первых, Акира и Винсент носят одну и ту же куртку. У обоих есть фетиш на удушение проволокой и надавливание ногой на кости. У них серые глаза и проблемы с агрессией. А Винсент попал в аварию, и поэтому у него пропала память, и он не помнит, что он Акира. Винсент сказал, что Акира исчез после аварии, ну, очевидно, теперь он Винсент. К тому же Сано пришел к Винсенту не просто так: он хотел, чтобы его бывший брат все помнил. У Акиры и Сано раньше были страстные отношения, и когда Сано пришел к Винсенту после потери Акиры, Сано покраснел. Не думаю, что он мог бы покраснеть из-за чужого мужчины, Сано не такой. И моя теория заключается в том, что когда мы играем у Винсента, он принимает боевую стойку, прежде чем убить MC. MC замечает, что уже видела эту стойку раньше. Так вот, Акира тоже сделал такую стойку, чтобы тоже выбить MC зубы. Думаю, что девушка сказала про стойку не просто так, а чтобы намекнуть, что Винсент и Акира — это одно и то же. Я сомневаюсь, что они с Винсом видели друг друга раньше, и он мог стоять где-то в этой позе. Короче говоря, это парадокс. Например, после того, как Акира выбил ей зубы, она умерла, а потом снова ожила в подвале Винсента, она говорит, что помнит такую стойку. Мне кажется, это не значит, что героиня умеет перерождаться после смерти. Это всего лишь подсказка.

Можно сказать, что у них другой характер. На самом деле это не имеет значения, ведь человек, забывший прошлое, наверняка упустил моменты, которые могли повлиять на его характер. Акира честен, дерзок и агрессивен. Винсент более нежный и свирепый, более терпеливый, чем Акира. Скорее всего, после аварии Винсент пересмотрел свою жизнь и просто как бы сбросил себя к заводским настройкам. Он стал смотреть на мир так, как смотрит его чистый разум, не осознающий прошлых мгновений.

Если я в чем-то не прав, вы можете меня поправить. Но я думаю, что акцент на позе Винсента был сделан не просто так.

[bestkillerin87]

Why is there no mention of THIS Jack, anywhere? This is also his appearance, but I haven't heard about it anywhere. This is probably the scariest thing you can find in Pandora...

(Рус. — Почему нигде нет упоминания об ЭТОМ Джеке? Это тоже его появление, но я нигде об этом не слышал. Это, наверное, самая страшная вещь, которую вы можете найти в Пандоре...)

[bestkillerin87]

Greetings, amateur community. If you've read a chapter from the Fazbears fright series of books – "The new kid", then you've probably wondered who Kelsey is. Seriously. I think it will be difficult... Determine his identity. We're playing detective, and my task today is to find the key to solving Kelsey. Enjoy reading.

Kelsey's personality. His mind and soul.

In fact, it was easy. Yes, I was joking with you, saying that this is impossible. It wasn't difficult, and that's why I'm confident in my conclusions.

Kelsey is none other than Andrew inside.

Why did I decide that?

Well, here are two proofs:

1. It was mentioned in the chapter that Kelsey was very serious during the payback conversation:

"Payback,— Mr. Gentry repeated.

—Yes," Heather said, "it's like someone is hurting you, so you have to hurt them back."

"The word 'payback' sounds a little vague," Mr. Gentry said. - Perhaps it's too open for interpretation. What if the reckoning goes too far?

Heather shrugged her shoulders. "Accidents happen," she laughed, and the whole class laughed with her. Devon laughed the loudest.

Mick noticed that Kelsey wasn't laughing. Mick wasn't laughing either. A shiver ran down his spine."

Only a vengeful spirit takes payback seriously... William is paying the price for murder! Yes, that's right. Kelsey, aka Andrew, was killed by William and, like a vengeful spirit, was waiting for his reckoning. The author did not mention this word in vain.

2. After Kelsey's death, the body of a black-haired child appeared in the suit. It wasn't mentioned whether it was a girl or a boy, but it was Andrew's vengeful spirit. What follows from this? That Kelsey was just a shell for Andrew's spirit, and when Kelsey was killed, he disappeared.

That's enough to confirm Kelsey's identity. Kelsey is Andrew inside. But who is he outside?

Kelsey's external transformation.

The strangest thing about this story is not Kelsey's soul, but who he is on the outside.

Logically speaking, we can say that Kelsey is really material, since he got to school and studied there, that is, he had identity documents. He had fans. He had a grandfather with whom he could negotiate. You know, it's hard to be a robot if everyone likes you! He just couldn't be a robot, even though Devon thought of him as a machine.

Just remember how Andrew in the chapter "The Man in Room 1280" appeared in physical form. And I think Kelsey is also one of Andrew's transformations into a material body.

The second version is that Kelsey is some kind of person that Andrew took over. This is also true, but from the canon's side - it sounds stupid, because that's how it is... It's just illogical.

I can say once again with confidence that Kelsey is Andrew's face, but still: what are his motives?

Kelsey's motives.

I have analyzed the purpose of his actions in the past theory, and I still have not come to any conclusion.

Let's think logically again: Andrew is a vengeful spirit who does nothing but torment William in hell and on earth. And Kelsey did the opposite: he made friends with single children, in our case Devon and Mick, and then invited them to hang out somewhere. At this "party" they were in an abandoned pizzeria, where Kelsey accidentally died. But the only thing he did again after rebirth was to look for lonely children. Again.

That is, it is not known whether Kelsey wanted to go to the abandoned in advance and die there or not. He found only single children.

Now tell me what the hell Andrew wants with these kids and why he's hanging out somewhere.

Yeah, hang out! He talked about it almost the whole chapter. I do not know why Andrew needs this.

My guess: habit. When Andrew died in a Fredber suit at William's hands, his agony was left there. After the disappearance of the corpse, William was killed in this costume, from which agony remembered the actions of the killer – to find lonely children and try to kill them, as William did. As a result, many years later, Andrew became an independent vengeful soul, but his agony still remembered these actions.

Maybe it wasn't even Andrew inside Kelsey, but agony. As if apart from him.

In any case, his motives are unrealistic.

Thank you for your attention, my little souls.

[bestkillerin87]

islaboo_art (twitter)

[bestkillerin87]

[bestkillerin87]

[bestkillerin87]

Why does John have four fingers?? What's wrong with his right hand?

[bestkillerin87]

Theory

In this post I will try to guess who Eleanor is and what role she plays in the plot. Enjoy reading.

– Acquaintance with Eleanor.

Before I start discussing her, I want you to roughly know and understand who she is.

Eleanor is the antagonist of the Fazbear's Fright series of books, appearing in the chapter "Being Beautiful" and the epilogues.

Eleanor has a painted face with pink cheeks and lips. Her red hair is braided in two tight pigtails, and her green eyes with long eyelashes look a little like a child from the circus. She has a smooth body with grayish skin, a long neck, a thin waist, rounded bust and hips. Her arms and legs are long and thin. Her body is also small and light, as seen when Larson easily threw her to the sides.

She is an evil and manipulative creature, prone to lies and deceit. She likes to tease and mock her opponents by winking at Jake after he has absorbed the evil contained in the Stack Ghost and telling Sarah that her wish came true when she was dying. Until now, the only person with whom she had any positive relationship was William Afton, as evidenced by the fact that she gave him the strength to create a merger and supported him when he was too weak. However, she was actually using him for her own purposes.

In addition, Eleanor used Andrew's infected things to her advantage: it was she who gave the Plush Toy Hunter his human eyes and teeth. It was she who tortured Delilah at 1:35 a.m., implying that Eleanor was experiencing Ella's Agony. She held Pete after he was hit by a truck in the movie "Closer to the Step." She was the great evil that was inside William Afton and popped out of his body. There is a version that she was the second signal in his brain when he was a patient. She was also the one who clung to Toby's shadow, appearing as RWQFSFASXC from the arcade game, inheriting his competitive nature in hide and seek, and was the one who pushed Sam under the train in Blackbird.

-Agony.

Well, when you've read this, it's time to start analyzing personality. And the first thing I would like to talk about is that Eleanor is an agony associated with an egg pit.

In this case, her existence is similar to that of Kelsey (the Newcomer), who may also have been created out of agony.

I will express my opinion: I agree with this theory, but not completely. Eleanor was most likely a Pitbonnie, because Pitbonnie, like Eleanor, had a black mustache. Perhaps Eleanor really knows how to travel in the pit, but she is not connected with this, but with balls. If she had been bound, she probably would have taken the rest from the soul balls, but she didn't, implying she couldn't. She just uses the power of the pit, but not the composition of the pit.

Eleanor was involved in Larson's nightmares, so maybe she's connected to his mind.

-Charlie in the trilogy.

There is a version that Eleanor is a creature similar to the robot Charlie from the trilogy.

I think so because she has a human body and the ability to transform into other people in the form of an illusory disk. At the same time, the name Eleanor is another form of the name Ella, like the Charlie doll.

Perhaps Eleanor was created by Dr. Talbert to revive Renelle after her death. The drawings of Charlie's bodies could have been found by him completely by accident.

-PitBonny.

As I said earlier, Eleanor was most likely a Pitbonnie before the events of the epilogues. This proves that PitBonny, like Eleanor, cried with a black mustache and had disks of illusions, rushed at everyone.

Perhaps Afton was even obsessed with Eleanor when he killed Bonnie in a spring suit. That's cool.

-Patient out of 46.

There is a theory that Eleanor may be a patient from 46, which is based on the fact that patient 46 looks like a person, but very unnatural, which is consistent with Eleanor's ability to disguise herself as people, as well as the fact that they seem to be related to William.

This sounds very interesting, and it's possible that Eleanor is probably the second signal keeping Afton alive. She could keep him at a distance. Unsurprisingly, the authors mentioned patient 46.

-Shadows.

There are rumors that Eleanor may be Bonnie's Shadow and Freddie's Shadow from the fnaf plot.

This is proved by the chapter "Hide and Seek", where the Shadow of Bonnie, who was Eleanor at that historical moment, came for you. Plus, Freddy's Shadow in the canon always brought back memories to the main character and was like a signal not to forget the past, and Eleanor has the same abilities. It looks like it.

-A Nightmarish Puppet.

And then hardcore starts for the Old fnaf.

There is a version that Eleanor, under someone's guidance, takes the form of a Nightmarish Puppet and torments children in their nightmares. This proves a security breach when we found Nightmare Doll toys in a room with a sleeping girl.

Eleanor's resemblance to a Puppet from a Nightmare firsthand: they both have antennae, and they are both real material beings, unlike nightmares.

But what if the Crying baby was also Eleanor's victim? It turns out that it existed back in the days of FNAF 1, in 1994. It's scary to live.

-Elizabeth.

The most popular theory is that Eleanor is the new Elizabeth.

It is quite possible. Eleanor pursued Delilah, holding back Ella's agony. Ella, who appears in chapter 1:35 in the morning, may be a Child without disks. In this case, Eleanor is closely related to a Child without disks, as if the soul of this Child has moved into Eleanor's costume, becoming a perfect evil. It sounds brilliant, and those who support this theory are probably smiling now.

-Perfect hell.

Well, the last thing I want to notice is a full mention of hell in Eleanor's presence.

In the epilogues, words like occultism, hell, demonic being refer to Eleanor. Maybe it's just a birth from hell that feeds on agony. What other creature can feed on the torment of people?? Just a hellish creature.

An ordinary robot does not need this, moreover, Eleanor did not really like Afton and did not get the rest for him. She lives for herself. And everything else.