If the little girl on the plan was supposed to be Eurus then why is her “mummy” on the plane THIS woman?
She is clearly no way close to looking like her real mother i.e. Sherlock and Mycroft’s mom. She was taken away to Sherrinford at a young age but she still has her childhood memories so she hasn’t forgotten her family members (clearly) and how they look.
I’ve seen meta highlighting how the girl on the plane is different from the other child Eurus and Moffat answered it by saying something in the lines of it is her imagination and doesn’t have to be how she looked in her childhood, or something like that. That also doesn’t make any sense.
Also there is no “papa”.
Seemed more like John mirror to me since his father was either not there since early childhood or his relationship with his father was not good. Plus the mother’s and the girl’s hair are brownish blond. (Even the other child Eurus has blond hair.) Her white and black striped dress. But I don’t know.
Eurus doesn’t make any sense to me, if she is supposed to be taken at face value. The god of the east wind Eurus is male and they named their girl child that? This is far too much of a digression from ACD stories, which I don’t mind as long it makes sense! Making a mad sister into a super villain and then saying almost the whole freaking series was kinda based on her actions?? Sherlock, John, Mycroft, Moriarty were all dancing around all these episodes because of Eurus? Like who cares about her and her childish whims?! Were they all on TD-12 when they wrote it? Why not just name the show Eurus?
And saying that - the man Sherlock is today is his memory of Eurus - like wtf? How? Clearly, he is nothing like her.
Anyway, point I’m trying to make is that TFP doesn’t make any sense. Thank you.