Assignments week 2
Origin of language
“Developmentally, dialogue comes before monologue, both for the human species and for the human individual”. - assignment origin of language week 2
I feel like that the reason that dialogue comes before monologue is that I see dialogue as the origin of language instead of monologue as the origin of language. You actually need communication between different people to create the language. This creates a language known by multiple people, who can spread the meaning of the words and sentences to others.
For example, little children learn a language from the communication between their parents and themselves. Later on they learn from the communication with others like siblings, friends or teachers. Through this manner of learning the language is being spread to others and correcting into the right way.
This is a great example on why you should start with dialogue while learning an new and foreign language. Start this with easy questions such as “What did you do during the weekend” or “What is your favorite movie or sports”, and let the student answer this. If the student understand this, he or she will answer you. If they don’t understand you can help him or her by correcting the mistakes.
Monologues can actually be quite negative towards new learners, because when a student doesn’t grasp the language to a certain level yet he or she may not be confident enough to carry out the monologue by himself or herself. This could even lead to a disliking towards the language.
Thought language
Yes, I do think that people think in language. Your thoughts are at least being translated in your head, which may seem hard to explain, but how else would you be able to tell a story if you don’t think in a language. In some cases this may be in a form of pictures instead of words. In which language people think, differs from person to person. I personally think in two languages, Dutch and English, but it really differs on the situation that I’m in. Right now I’m thinking in English because I’m writing in English right now. I think in Dutch when I’m talking to people who speak Dutch.
But if we consider the fact that we need to be able to think to form words, wouldn’t that already answer the question of people thinking in languages? Everything you say has been thought about, maybe not consciously but without thinking you wouldn’t have come up with that specific word. So yes, I think people so think in a certain language and sometimes even more than one language.
Dreams
It has been proves that people dream, and that those dreams are thoughts while you are asleep. We stated in the paragraph “Thoughts” that people think in a certain language, so I would say that people also dream in a language.
What language people dream in, would also differ from person to person, but I feel like it’s safe to say that this would be their native language since dreaming happens in the subconsciousness instead of the awake active part of the brain. However, I know from personal experience that it’s possible to dream in different languages.
This is the same for blind or deaf people, because a blind person has amazing hearing and can grasp a language that way instead of seeing the actual words instead. So, it seems logical that blind people would dream in the language they have heard the most since that would be their native language.
Deaf people are a different section in this subject, since they can’t hear a language but just see the words. Would that mean that they don’t dream in words? They have their own language, sign language, so that could mean that they dream in that language instead.
People don’t only dream in language but also in images and “pictures”. Blind and deaf people have altered these things in their sleep but are still experiencing a version of this.
Resources
http://deafblindness.blogspot.nl/2010/06/how-deafblind-think-and-dream.html













