Why the fuck does this hit so hard
I swear D+G is one of the best power couples ever

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Japan
seen from Moldova
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Yemen
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from Moldova
seen from China
seen from Austria

seen from United States
seen from United States
Why the fuck does this hit so hard
I swear D+G is one of the best power couples ever
On the other hand, a Go piece has only a milieu of exteriority, or extrinsic relations with nebulas or constellations, according to which it fulfills functions of insertion or situation, such as bordering, encircling, shattering. All by itself, a Go piece can destroy an entire constellation synchronically; a chess piece cannot (or can do so diachronically only). Chess is indeed a war, but an institutionalized, regulated, coded war, with a front, a rear, battles. But what is proper to Go is war without battle lines, with neither confrontation nor retreat, without battles even: pure strategy, whereas chess is a semiology. Finally, the space is not at all the same: in chess, it is a question of arranging a closed space for oneself, thus of going from one point to another, of occupying the maximum number of squares with the minimum number of pieces. In Go, it is a question of arraying oneself in an open space, of holding space, of maintaining the possibility of springing up at any point: the movement is not from one point to another, but becomes perpetual, without aim or destination, without departure or arrival. The “smooth” space of Go, as against the “striated” space of chess. The nomas of Go against the State of chess, nomas against polis. The difference is that chess codes and decodes space, whereas Go proceeds altogether differently, territorializing or deterritorializing it (make the outside a territory in space; consolidate that territory by the construction of a second, adjacent territory; deterritorialize the enemy by shattering his territory from within; deterritorialize oneself by renouncing, by going elsewhere...). Another justice, another movement, another space-time.
Gilles Deleuze Felix Guattari Thousand Plateaus
Instead of the great paranoid fear, we are trapped in a thousands little monomanias, self-evident truths, and clarities that gush from every black hole and no longer form a system, but are only rumble and buzz, blinding lights giving any and everybody the mission of self-appointed judge, dispenser of justice, policeman, neighbourhood SS man. We have overcome fear, we have sailed from the shores of security, only to enter a system that is no less organized: the system of petty insecurities that leads everyone to their own black hole in which to turn dangerous, possessing a clarity on their situation, role, and mission even more disturbing than the certitudes of the first line.
Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
A concept is a brick. It can be used to build the courthouse of reason. Or it can be thrown through the window.
Brian Massumi
Language is not made to be believed but to be obeyed, and to compel obedience newspapers, news, proceed by redundancy, in that they tell us what we ‘must’ think, retain, expect, etc. language is neither informational nor communicational. It is not the communication of information but something quite different: the transmission of order-words.
Gilles Deleuze