wonderlandchihuahuas replied to your post “Finally saw the Camille Belcourt casting, which explains why I saw so...”
How many people have been cast at this point? Sorry I'm out of the loop. Also the only scene I've seen of Izzy is the club scene and isn't she kind of supposed to be crazy sexy because she's seducing that demon. Are there more? Please don't take any of that disrespectful. I sincerely didn't mean to sound rude if I did!
You don’t sound rude at all, don’t worry! ^^ (Besides, given how much I gripe about this fandom, I try to be more accepting of callous responses. Bc callousness brings out callousness, or something xD) (But like, you didn’t sound rude or callous at all^^)
All the castings are listed here in order of announcement.
Also, I was going to put that under a readmore but actually, I’d rather make it easier to read in full--sorry about that.
I’ll adress the thing with Izzy first, because it’s the shortest: yes, in the books Isabelle does use her sexuality as a weapon to seduce the demon into a trap. However, not only did the show ramp that up to eleven (by giving her much more reavealing clothing than hinted at in the book) that whole thing is inherently sexist, because it presents sexually active women as predators, which is a way to shame women for their sexuality--and in the case of Izzy who is 16, it’s also sexualizing a girl who is way too young to be sexualized.
(Again, giving her sexual desire and activity is fine, lots of 16yo kids have them. What’s not right is to turn her into an object of people’s desire. Those are different things.)
Also on a storytelling and strategic levels it’s a bad decision. As in: Izzy is trying to trap a predator and you usually do that by presenting yourself as a potential victim, not as a rival. and thematically speaking, you would get a much better example of Demons being dangerous and “evil” if you paint them as looming creatures looking for helpless people to hurt rather than put them in a victim’s place, being baited to their death.
Lastly, we also have to keep in mind that being sexy isn’t the same as being sexualized. The Wives in Mad Max: Fury Road are sexy, but they’re not sexualized, there’s a significant difference.
Concerning the casting, so far we have:
Simon: Protag, racially ambiguous in canon - Latin@ actor
Isabelle: Protag, racially ambiguous in canon - Latin@ actress
Clary: MC, canonically white racially ambiguous in canon - White actress
Alec: Protag, racially ambiguous in canon - White actor
Luke: Protag, canonically white racially ambiguous in cnon- Black actor
Magnus: Protag, Indonesian in canon - Chinese actor (-_-)
Valentine: Major villain, canonically white racially ambiguous in canon - White actor
Jocelyn: Protag, canonically white racially ambiguous in canon - White actress
Hodge: Minor villain, canonically white racially ambiguous in canon - White actor
Raphael: Minor villain, canonically latin@ - Latin@ actor
Camille: Semi-major villain, canonically white - Brown caucasian actress Chinese + Irish origins
Blackwell: Minor villain, racially ambiguous in canon - White actor
Pangborn: Minor villain, racially ambiguous in canon - Black actor
Alaric: Minor protag, racially ambiguous in canon - Middle Eastern actor (by the looks of him, correct me if I’m wrong)
Merliorn: Minor villain, racially ambiguous in canon - Midle eastern actor (Again, based on looks--feel free to correct me or bring a more precise id on the table^^)
In bold, you can see the characters whose race or skin color was either outright changed or picked in defiance of the “white is the default” trope. In and of itself, I’ll agree it’s nice to see more diverse characters on the screen, and I appreciate that--but when you look a little deeper you realize thatseveral of these changes coincide with much less savory trope.
For example, Camille and Isabelle, who are both presented as very proactive sexually speaking, were both cast as Latin@ -- Latin@ (particularly women) are often portrayed as hyperactive, sexually speaking.
The fact that both sexually proactive were cast as Latin@ reinforces 1) the idea that Latin@ women are always sexually proactive and 2) given that sexual proactivity in women is presented as a bad thing more often than not, it also reinforces the idea that Latin@ women are lesser than white women (who, in this specific case, most likely won’t be portrayed as sexually in charge)
Almost all of the characters whose actors aren’t white are non-human or will turn non human at some point (Alaric and Luke are werewolves, Simon will turn into a vamp, Pangborn is a warlock, Meliorn is half-fairy, etc.) This is othering because it associates the idea of being white and being human (which by default contributes to the dehumanization of POCs)
Note: Cassandra Clare actually started this trend, since most of her POC characters are Downworlders and/or villains, despite her claiming that Shadowhunters are a super diverse bunch.
Several of the characters who were casted aginst the idea that “white is the default” will be dead by the end of the series, some of them by the end of season 1. (Alaric, Pangborn & Meliorn come to mind)
Alec, who could have been cast as Latin@ was cast as white, once again abiding by the unspoken rule that if a character “has to” be gay, then they can’t also be brown.
(Note: I know Magnus contradicts that but given the negative tropes attached to his portrayal I don’t really feel like he offers much of a counter example, and that’s without even going into the insensitive casting choice of picking Harry Schum Jr to portray him)
Lastly, the only character whose casting went against explicit whiteness in canon is Luke, who is a werewolf. Considering the prejudiced tropes that depict black men as bestial, violent, dangerous and out of control, the decision is... suspicious at best.
Did the producers cast this way with the idea of sending a specific message? I don’t think so. But not only does that do nothing to negate the unfortunate implications of their decisions, if they play it the Clare way (aka. try to claim ally points and refuse to listen people who tell them they’re anything but perfect) it’s going to be even worse, because that’ll mean even an even wider audience tricked into thinking this is the kind of representation POCs need.
EDIT: It has been pointed out to me that Clary and the others weren’t actually explicited as white in canon, which I overlooked at first--apparently I’m not completely rid of the idea that no description=white :/ Sorry about that
EDIT 2: 910707 pointed out to me that Kaitlyn Leeb isn’t actually Latin@ but actually has Chinese and Irish origins.Again, I can only apologize for the misinformation :/]