It was a far, far, better thing when it was done the first time. Practically everyone, including comic book artist Jim Lee, has recognized and commented on the similarities between his recently released art for Superman and Wonder Woman's first hook up in the New 52's Justice League #12 and Superman and Lois' ecstatic reunion in 2005's For Tomorrow. The focus, so far, has been mostly on the embrace in the sky. Yet, because the parallels go beyond that one image it produces an overall impression which effectively reduces the power and quality of the more recent rendition.
Problems with Parallels
The impact of the imagery from For Tomorrow should not be underestimated. Not only was it so well known that Smallville did an homage to it in the episodes "Idol" and "Pandora" (seen here in a picspam made by captaindove), a San Diego Comic-Con 2012 attendee, snappilier, reported that a 3D statue of the scene was visible at DC's booth where Jim Lee was signing. It's a beautiful scene, so it's no surprise why it would be tempting to recreate it. For Tomorrow, written by current Wonder Woman scribe Brian Azzarello and illustrated by Justice League's Jim Lee (known offender of cookie cutter art apparently), tells the story of Superman's misguided attempt to allay the anxiety he felt about losing those he loves and avoid the pain of such a loss by creating a "paradise" called Metropia using his father Jor-El's Phantom Zone technology (story synopsis/review here). The lesson, of course, was to choose hope rather than fear.
Interestingly, the scene of Superman and Wonder Woman's kiss was atop the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC. That very place honors a human being who lost his life because he stood up for what he believed in; it was made in a style evokes ancient Greek temples to ethereal gods, but made for a man. Hopefully, Superman and Wonder Woman's relationship is only a step on a larger journey for both of them to learn to trust and respect humanity's courage to live and love despite the fear of death.
Although likely unintended, the scene between Superman and Wonder Woman also echoes story beats in the Clark/Lois relationship on Smallville. In the show's final few seasons, the relationship between Lois and Clark was developed alongside Clark's early stages as a proto-Superman called the Blur. The Blur first reached out to Lois after years of being her friend as Clark in the episode "Stiletto," which explores the idea of a super and human love connection in a depth that is only enriched further in its sister episode the following year, "Charade." "Stiletto" starts out with Clark's friend, Chloe, joining in show bloggers suggesting that a supposedly new lady hero in town, Stiletto, could be the love connection Clark needed after his break up with his first love, Lana Lang. For most of the episode, Lois thinks she has to be a superhero like the Blur to get his attention. However, it's her courageous attempt to save Clark and Jimmy and humility in being able to both admit her mistakes and understand the loneliness of a hero which inspires Clark to connect with Lois.
Like Superman and Diana, this conversation takes place at the end of the episode by moonlight (watch it here). In it, Lois says "I'm not saying that I know what it's like to be a hero, but even the fastest blur in the world can't outrun loneliness. I guess what I'm saying is if you ever want to talk--totally off the record--I'm only a phone call away." According to Clark, this was the moment he began to fall more in love with Lois. A year after this conversation, in the episode "Charade" (again by moonlight) Lois and Clark are able to unknowingly bond over their mutual understanding of, and participation in, altruism, illustrating that one doesn't need to be a superhero to understand that impulse and to have a heroic spirit.
Earlier that same season in an episode called "Warrior," writer Bryan Q. Miller follows the lead of "Stiletto" by addressing the hero/human relationship dilemma head on. Not only does Lois donning a pseudo Wonder Woman outfit to gain the interest of fanboys at a comic convention symbolically represent the temptation to use Wonder Woman for titillation in Superman stories, it also gives Clark the opportunity to express his true desire. Helping him get there, is another temptation: superpal, Zatanna. In rejecting Zatanna, and embracing Lois, the episode establishes that for a Superman whose life is full of the duty, responsibility, and strangeness a human life with someone with an ordinary job yet extraordinary courage and similar values is his romantic fantasy because it brings balance to his life. So, Clark chooses Lois even though he confesses to Zatanna how much he fears what could happen based on all the loss and pain he experienced from his other attempts at human attachments. Such boldness is at the very heart of a hero and hero's journey, which is why Clark's New 52 counterpart should ultimately make a similar choice.
Monomythic Love and Heroism
Both For Tomorrow and Smallville's Season 9, explore the problems with trying to control the variables in one's life through Utopian escapism or self-imposed detachment from humans. These are stories about hubris and faith which teach us, as well as the hero, that pain is a part of life and to deal with it one shouldn't run away or give in to fear, to darkness, but to live in hope. Mythologist Joseph Campbell discussed this in his famous conversation with Bill Moyers in The Power of Myth:
CAMPBELL: Any life career that you choose in following your bliss should be chosen with that sense -- that nobody can frighten me off from this thing. And no matter what happens, this is the validation of my life and action.
MOYERS: And in choosing love, too?
CAMPBELL: In choosing love, too.
MOYERS: Is that what Wagner meant in his great opera on Tristan and Isolde, when he said, "In this world let me have my world, to be damned with it or to be saved"?
CAMPBELL: Yes, that's exactly what Tristan said.
MOYERS: Meaning, I want my love, I want my life.
CAMPBELL: This is my life, yes. And I'm willing to take any kind of pain for it.
MOYERS: And this took a courage, didn't it?
CAMPBELL: Doesn't it? Even to think of it.
Thus the true hero has the courage to follow his bliss, according to Campbell. He or she understands that denying love out of a desire to protect isn't about protecting the other person for their sake, but about protecting one's own self from the pain of loss; hence it's selfish act that, in truth, primarily emphasizes self-preservation.
The hero in any romantic legend or mythic narrative is also, as Moyers suggests, an individual who achieves "union" between his "nature and spirit" or, said differently, "the union once again of what has been divided." Marriage in this context is said to be the "reunion of the self with the self, with the male or female grounding of ourselves." With Superman/Clark noticeably interested in Lois romantically in issues of Action Comics and Superman prior to the recent Justice League, and with one of the core themes of Superman narratives being the dichotomy between alien and human, it would seem the only organic and logical evolution of Superman's character would be to bravely overcome his fears to follow his bliss with Lois in order to find peace and wholeness; likewise with Diana and her first love, Steve Trevor, whose departure from her life by her own choice inspired the loneliness which brought her and Superman together last week.
Bottom Line
Looking at the images of Superman with Lois in For Tomorrow and with Diana in Justice League, in consideration of what's been presented on Smallville and discussed with Joseph Campbell, it should become evident that the relationship between Superman and Wonder Woman is much like Metropia in For Tomorrow. It has the superficial appearances of perfection, but it's flawed and unsustainable because its foundation is fear, and any relationship rooted in fear is shallow indeed. That the relationship would be presented with recycled imagery simply emphasizes this further.
PREVIOUS INSTALLMENTS: Introduction | Men of Action | Fantasy vs. Reality | Finding a Balance, Becoming Whole | No Pedestals, Just Love | The Weight of Perfection | A Final Test, A Perfect Fit
Oscar Wilde once said “to define is to limit.” So true is this statement to Lois and Clark, that it is simultaneously frustrating and revealing. Defining Clark as alien and human might make it easier to handle the complex nature of his identity and identity struggles, but it also makes it easier to make unfair judgments based an overly simplistic assessment. So anyone who would argue that Lois Lane isn’t as good for Clark Kent as Lana Lang, because they choose to see the connection and faith Lois showed in the Blur and her struggle to believe her imperfect self could be an asset to him as proof of an insincere and incomplete love for Clark, would be quite mistaken. The Blur and Clark began as two different yet equally valid expressions of who Clark is at heart, and as those facades let Lois and Clark share their secret sides they came closer to the truth of who they were as individuals and as a couple.
Once they found that truth, it meant in a capricious world they had something real and sturdy to believe in and to pin their hopes and dreams on. For Clark, this meant someone who understood him completely and loved him unconditionally in a way that enabled him to never feel alone despite his differences and duties. For Lois, this meant someone who understood her completely and loved her unconditionally in a way that enabled her to feel valuable despite her imperfections. In short, to have a home in each other and be a home for one another made them the “perfect fit” Lois described them as in the Finale. Their hearts were homes where they could find peace—peace that comes from the balance of their complementary natures and peace that comes from the freedom to live life as it's meant to be lived: messily.
Prophecy, the penultimate episode of the series, explores themes of power, love, and sacrifice by putting several characters, including Lois, to the test. It begins with Clark taking Lois to his Fortress of Solitude where he proudly asks Jor-El “as a Kryptonian, as a member of [the House of El], and “[his son” to approve his marriage to Lois. In this request, Clark shows he honors his Kryptonian side just as he honors his human side. Nonetheless, Jor-El decides not to honor Clark’s request until he tests his son and future bride with a power swap so they could “both understand” what it would truly mean for their lives “to be joined.” Helping Lois understand his Kryptonian side, “instead of hiding” it, was something Clark said he wanted to do in the preceding episode, Dominion. He wanted Lois to understand that even though he makes “choices using [his] human side […] sometimes his Kryptonian side takes over,” which means “try[ing] to control [a] situation” by “lean[ing] on no one.” By granting Lois all the powers of a true Kryptonian, Jor-El granted Clark’s wish in a way that would test and ultimately validate his bond with Lois.
The Power Within
True power, Smallville tells us, comes from within; hence the most significant insights gained from the power swap in Prophecy focus on emotional rather than physical strength. Throughout the day, Lois eagerly uses her new powers to tackle as many tasks and crises as possible. But soon she discovers that her typical zeal, which makes her such a formidable foe as a journalist and such a fierce friend and lover, also makes her impetuous. It took Clark years of trial and error to learn how to approach his heroics with a balance of passion and precision. Lois, on the other hand, is shaken when she realizes she has to reign in her passion—her emotions—to prioritize in a way that means not saving everyone all the time and not letting her feelings for one person, Clark, make her vulnerable. One can see in her confession to Clark later—that she “always knew” he “had a big heart” yet never “realized how strong it was”—how much Lois saw herself as having an equally “big heart,” but not the same requisite strength to balance it out. More importantly, she realized how truly delicate a balance that was to keep. She therefore concluded that because Clark had been her “greatest weakness,” she would be his; for, at any moment, she could tip the balance away from a selfless duty to many toward a selfish love for one. So, Lois decided to sacrifice her selfish desires to be with Clark believing it would be in everyone’s best interests.
If what Lois experiences in Prophecy sounds somewhat familiar, it should, since it echoes Lana’s final arc on the show which similarly had her experience power and sacrifice. Where Lana’s and Lois’ experiences differ reveals one of the key reasons why Lois is better suited for Clark. After Lana’s first experience with Clark’s powers in Season 5’s Thirst she said she had been able “for a moment” to “feel what was inside [Clark’s] heart” and in it there was “warmth and love and an overwhelming feeling of strength.” Had Lana remembered that the strength was in Clark’s heart, perhaps her ending wouldn’t have been so tragic. Unfortunately, Lana became so desperate to protect herself after years of victimization, and redeem herself after recently surrendering to her darker impulses to get revenge, that she tries to be like Clark only to end up a pale imitation. One sees the chinks in Lana’s armor when her trainer Carter Bowfry, in the aptly named Power, warns her she needs more “maturity” only to have her disagree, saying what she “needs is power.” Those chinks are also on display when she lies to Clark about her mission to acquire powers for fear he’d disapprove, since such a lie makes it so she directly contradicts her stated desire to be “more like Clark” (i.e. she can’t be more like Clark by doing something she doesn’t believe he’d ever condone). Finally, when Lana’s pursuit of power and her romantic delusions of a life with Clark were tested the ultimate truth, which all of the above hinted at, was revealed: Lana didn’t yet have the “true power” that comes from within. Lois, in Prophecy, hadn’t found the power within her yet either.
Lana believed in Power that “nothing could hurt her” physically, and Lois believed in Prophecy that she and Clark were “bulletproof;” they both were wrong, but Lois only temporarily so. Lana left Clark in Requiem not because she “sacrificed everything for her bulletproof beau,” as Toyman erroneously told Lois two years later in Prophecy, but because she sacrificed her relationship with that beau for innocent people in Metropolis threatened by Lex’s bomb, and then was too weak-hearted to deal with the emotional pain that sacrifice entailed. Her final tearful words to Clark implied that he was “stronger” than her because all her effort to become his equal by starting with the outside instead of the inside left her still too enamored with the physical and superficial and still too weak emotionally. Weeping, Lana confesses in Requiem that Clark was “stronger than” her because, unlike him, the pain of not being able to touch him anymore was more difficult to bear than the pain of not being in his life anymore. Lois’ surrender in Prophecy may be similar, in that sacrificing her happiness for the sake of innocent people was a factor, but what she couldn’t bear wasn’t about anything physical or about her own unfulfilled happiness; quite the opposite. No, what made Lois weep was knowing “every moment” she and Clark shared together meant “stealing from people that need saving” and standing “in his way” of being an even better hero than he already was.
Hitherto, Lois had coped with Clark’s heroic duty by seeking assurances that she would be an asset rather than a liability. The experience in Prophecy of having Clark’s powers and risking lives for his sake when Toyman threatened his life made Lois realize how dangerous needing someone like she wanted Clark to need her really was. In other words, Lois finally understood what Clark meant in Dominion about Kryptonians’ inclination to control instead of trust; it’s less emotionally taxing. It devastated her to think that Clark could help more people if he wasn’t spending time with her or that he could ever be defeated if her life was threatened in any way, especially if it was her fault her life was in jeopardy in the first place. So, like Lana prior to getting the Prometheus suit, Lois worried about being a distraction and holding Clark back. Unlike Lana, however, Lois didn’t try to fix the problem with inadequate superficial solutions nor was she unresponsive to Clark’s heart reaching out to hers. Instead, as usual their perfectly complemented souls found their way back to each other and strengthened each other through the power of what was in their hearts, particularly as reflected in their wedding vows.
The Right Decision
Now, one might wonder why test Lois so close to her wedding and have her make a decision most know, based on their existing knowledge of the Superman mythology, isn’t going to last. The answer can be found in Prophecy itself. In the episode, the tale of Orion describes a son who had to turn away from his father to find the power within himself to forge his own destiny as a warrior of light. Lois and Clark are each presented with a variation of this same dilemma. For Clark, Jor-El prophesies that “a time will come when [Clark] turns away from” him, but “in the end, he will make the right decision.” Following in Orion’s footsteps and Jor-El’s predictions, Clark returns to the Fortress to tell Jor-El, “I can only be what the world needs when I can finally admit that I am no longer just the son of Jor-El or Jonathan Kent, and you knew the time would come when neither of you could guide me anymore. And that time is now. Goodbye, Jor-El.” Even though Jor-El knew that this was not “the right decision” (a decision he said would come later for Clark and did in the Finale), it was a necessary step. Likewise, it was a necessary step for Lois to be able to give up Clark because it gave both Lois and Clark the opportunity to definitively choose their destinies in the finale.
Clark, as predicted, returns to Jor-El because, while it was important for him to acknowledge that he was ready to hold his own counsel, it did not necessitate absolutely cutting Jor-El out of his life. At the Fortress, Clark tells his father, “I shouldn't have tried to push away my Kryptonian side. My strength is accepting it, accepting you.” Pleased, Jor-El says to his son, “Any father can only hope that he is one day humbled by the feats of his son. But it is your soul, Kal-El, of which I am most proud. […] I ask you to remember one thing. Your abilities may be of my blood, but it is your time in Smallville, with Jonathan and Martha Kent and all the people there, that made you a hero, Kal-El.” In short, Jor-El was happy to acknowledge humanity remained an important part of Clark and he was proud Clark had found a way to integrate and balance his alien nature (super) and human upbringing (man) to become Superman.
Lois, having made a decision similar to Clark’s—which in her case was to detach from Clark to show she was prepared to put the world’s needs above her own, including her need to be needed—would have to make her own “right decision” as well. She had to realize her strength was accepting that she, and the balance and belief she provided Clark, were assets not liabilities. For, as Chloe reminds her, unlike a god, Clark is “a man.” And, as a man, he “sometimes needs to not listen. [He] needs to rest, to love, to laugh. And when he [takes] to the skies” he'll need Lois “to ground him.” The latter got Lois to think, but only the words from her soul mate’s wedding vows touched her enough to prompt her eventual change of heart.
I, Clark Kent, take you, Lois Lane, to be my companion, forever. With you by my side I will never be alone. Though the world sees a strong and independent woman, I've never known someone with such gentle grace and more pure heart. When I've been lost you've always been there to bring me back, so on this day, at this moment, I pledge the rest of my life to you. You've always believed in me, and I believe in you. When you believe in someone it's not for a minute, or just for now, it's forever.
Considering these are Clark’s wedding vows, it’s expected they would profoundly encapsulate his feelings for Lois in a way that would move her. Fortunately, they do that and so much more starting with the first sentence. Look up companionate love anywhere and one discovers that Clark desiring Lois as his “companion forever” is more tender and significant than what some might believe. It’s the kind of love that provides a solid foundation that endures the storms of life. Clark and Lana were perpetually in the infatuation or passionate stage of love that most experts would equate to a high from a drug which rarely survives challenges and always subsides leaving some couples who lack companionate love desperate for their next fix. For Clark and Lana, secrets, lies, and other forms of delusion were used to maintain their artificial high, and they never stayed together long enough to face the truth about themselves and whether what they had was enough once all the artifices and highs were lifted. Clark and Lois, conversely, began as friends, became passionately in love, and developed the companionate love which is a deeper, more mature, more enduring, and more affectionate form of attachment between people who love, like, and respect each other. In short, it’s the kind of love that sustains couples married decades.
Clark’s vows continue, declaring that with Lois by his side, he’d never be alone. What Clark is saying isn’t that Lois is just a warm body to keep him company. Rather, it goes back to a conversation Clark had with his mother in Obsession when she reassured him that “someday” he’d “find the person who’s right for [him]” and he replied that “he thought that person” could have been Lana or Alicia but because he couldn’t be honest with Lana, and because Alicia’s powers didn’t mean she was like him, he was resigned to the reality that he’d “always be alone.” Nevertheless, unlike his relationship with Alicia, Clark realized what he needed wasn’t someone just like him but his complement. And unlike his relationship with Lana, Clark and Lois ultimately broke through their walls and facades until their secrets became their truth which, again, simply means that their understanding of each other was so complete and so accurate that they not only strengthened each other, their hearts were virtually interchangeable. A poem by Sir Philip Sidney featured in Elizabeth (1997) expresses this beautifully:
My true-love hath my heart, and I have his,
By just exchange one for the other given:
I hold his dear, and mine he cannot miss;
There never was a bargain better driven.
His heart in me keeps me and him in one,
My heart in him his thoughts and senses guides;
He loves my heart for once it was his own;
I cherish his because in me it bides.
Sharing one's life with another means trusting your heart to someone else. And to entrust one’s heart to another, as the poet describes, requires a great deal of faith in one’s beloved. The goddess Isis got Clark to “take that leap” of faith in Isis/Harvest after explaining to him that “true love” means risking one’s whole heart by giving it to one’s beloved for safekeeping. Even more important, though, was that Lois was willing to take the risk with him so they could truly "share a life together." As Clark said, "the odds are stacked against us and we would be risking everything, but if you are ready to take that leap, there's no one else I would want to take that leap with."
By Kent, Clark showed he was ready for another leap of faith to enhance the life he and Lois shared together when he decided to follow his own advice to his father about Martha in Earth-2 and risk leaving the farm behind because he’d come to understand his true home wasn’t a place; it was Lois. With her, Clark was incapable of getting beset by the “sadness and loneliness” (Warrior) of a hero’s life, or getting detached from humanity, because he carried Lois’ heart with him and she kept his safe with her. Clark trusted Lois with his heart in this way because, like he said in Luthor, she could “see right through” him “straight to” his “soul, to [his] heart].” As Clark also eloquently stated in his vows, that kind of clear-eyed, full-hearted love was one he couldn’t “live” without because he knew if he was ever “lost” Lois would “always” be able to “bring [him] back." To put it simply, Lois helped Clark feel safe to face his fears of being different from everyone else, which was the thing that had always made him feel alone. As Ned from Pushing Daisies would say, “Home did not mean four walls and a door you never walk out of. It was a feeling of where you belong.” Clark felt he belonged with Lois, so he risked opening the door of his heart wide open for her and subsequently felt safe leaving behind the house he'd grown up in knowing he had the heart of the woman he'd grown to love instead.
Clark telling Lois in his vows that she made him not feel alone was therefore a touching affirmation from Clark that he’d finally found the right person he said in Obsession he dreaded he’d never find, and being his complement was an important part of this. That Lois was Clark’s complement, or the Yin to his Yang, is expressed in the next section of Clark’s vows that goes, “Though the world sees a strong and independent woman, I've never known someone with such gentle grace and more pure heart.” Here, Clark is saying that on the outside Lois projects strength and independence—traits associated with Kryptonians—but she has a softer side which displays a different kind of strength that he became particularly enamored with during his phone calls with her as the Blur (Hostage). Clark, of course, is essentially the inverse of this. In this way, Lois and Clark are both strong, independent, gracious, and pure of heart; they just generally express those traits differently.
What does it mean, though, to have grace and a pure heart? Answering that question is difficult yet, fortunately, not impossible. Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life describes grace as something that “doesn’t try to please itself. [It] accepts being slighted, forgotten, disliked….accepts insults and injuries.” It doesn’t look for “reasons to be unhappy.” Thus, grace expresses itself in Lois in her caring for others when they need help, in her celebrating of others’ successes and commiserating with their failures, in forgiving others, in doing the right thing even when it’s difficult (like admitting her mistakes), and in not letting bitterness or envy take root to the point of perpetual dissatisfaction and restlessness. Meanwhile, purity of heart most nearly means to not be a hypocrite (source). A person whose beliefs never falter and who demonstrates a consistency between appearance and reality is, therefore, a person with a pure heart. Being pure hearted, Lois has the power within that gives her the true strength Lana lacked; Lois was strong in body and in spirit.
Such spiritual strength, or purity of heart, exists in Lois because she, unlike Lana, places her faith in what’s true and substantive instead of empty delusions. Some might recall the parable of the wise man who built his house upon the rock found in Matthew 7:24 which states, “The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock.” With truth as her rock and guidepost, Lois effectively roots out the corruption in herself and others. Whenever she falters she admits her mistake and whenever others falter, such as when someone abuses or co-opts power by perverting or obscuring the truth, she reveals that hypocrisy and demands justice. Clark relies on this because not only does it mean Lois herself won’t become corrupted by his secret as others did, it also means she’ll be able to act as a tether to his true self, allowing him to express different sides of who he is without getting lost in either.
Given that much of what it means to be pure of heart relates to the sincerity of one’s beliefs, the fact that Clark mentions belief in the closing of his wedding vows is significant. He wrote, “You've always believed in me, and I believe in you. When you believe in someone it's not for a minute, or just for now, it's forever." For Clark, and the show, belief is the epitome of love. Not only did Cat Grant describe a person who really loves you as someone who, "when no one else believes in you [is] the one person who loves you unconditionally [...] the one you'd risk anything for" (Isis), but Clark viewed Chloe's lack of belief in Jimmy in Season 8 as anathema to what spouses should do when they're trying to "build a life together" (Hex). More importantly, at Lex’s rehearsal dinner before his wedding to Helen in Calling Clark said all of his research and soul searching to write the perfect speech made one thing quite clear to him: “There are no words for [love]. And when you have it you trust it, and you believe in it.” So when tasked with expressing his own loving feelings for Lois, Clark naturally described his indescribable deep love for Lois as belief.
In general, believing in someone means you will always have such a deep love for them that no matter what, it will endure. You'll also always want the best for the person you love and always be able to look past any shortcomings to see their true potential. It means trusting a person with everything you are and everything you hope to be. Blind faith it is not. As Cat Grant said in Shield, “People need to see someone’s heart to believe in them.” Undoubtedly, Clark wanted Lois to "know [him] completely" (Harvest), knew that she did (Luthor), and felt she believed in him by the end of the series (Collateral, Finale). Clark saw Lois’ heart clearly as well, and believed in her; not so with Lana.
In a Season 2 conversation about belief, Lana confided in Clark her fear that he’d “created this perfect picture of who” she was and “that one day” he’d “get a good look at” her and be disappointed she wasn’t “as strong or as good as” he thought which would “change the way” he felt about her (Accelerate). At the time, Clark denied that could happen, but his actions proved otherwise. In Season 7, Lana begged Clark to not “take on all the blame” for the dark path she’d chosen to deal with Lex just so he could “hold onto this perfect image” he’d “created” of her (Wrath). But Clark preferred to blame himself over taking an honest look at Lana’s heart, because he doubted whether he could still love her if he allowed himself to see the truth he was avoiding. By Siren, Lana had become convinced Clark secretly “doubt[ed] whether [she’d] be the one” he’d “end up with.” Brainiac’s attack and Lex’s kidnapping of Lana only postponed the inevitable. Clark and Lana’s last chance began inauspiciously in Bulletproof with Clark’s inclination to “squint” at Lana so he could pretend she was 14 again. Such delusional nostalgia was emphasized further in the opening to Clark and Lana’s final episode together. “The world moves so fast today,” Toyman mused in Requiem. “People forget how much better they had it as kids, when hours seemed like days and a favorite toy could be a child's best friend. Toys are powerful things, you know. They are vessels for the imagination imbued with life through the simple act of play.”
With love and faith in each other free from delusions and conditions, Clark and Lois didn’t just “play” at love like Clark and Lana did; they had true love, so they found their way back to each other letting their wedding vows be their guide. The first to lose her way, Lois found Clark’s vows so infused with the power of his true love for her that they broke through her doubts, making her realize she had been an “idiot” to have broken their engagement because of this epiphany: “I can be loud, and at times I'm a little bossy. So someone might wonder why a person of your God-like caliber would be with a woman who is so imperfect. Well don't take this the wrong way but you come with some baggage of your own and it's made me a better person. Just like being with me will make you a greater man and a superhero.” Said differently, Clark's faith in Lois—stated as belief in his vows—got her to accept that she wasn't a liability like she'd feared, and that accepting their imperfections and sharing them along with their doubts, made them better and stronger instead of weaker.
Consequently, it was significant that, while leaning on the door of their apartment in the Finale, Lois and Clark leaned on each other. Only this time it was Lois' turn to do what Clark did for her and what he, in his vows, said she did so well--help him find his way back--because while his vows may have heartened her, her prior doubts had come to weigh heavily on him because his belief in her meant he had a lot of faith in her judgment. So instead of surrendering to his doubts, Clark shared them. He told Lois that her reservations and her family’s sudden inability to attend the wedding were beginning to look like ominous signs affirming her decision to call if off. Fortunately, after Clark’s vows inspired a change of heart in her, Lois' were able to inspire a change of heart in him:
I wanted these vows to be perfect, but perfection is a hard thing to get your hands on. But life is meant to be a little messy, and when it comes to love I think it's like my dad always said about the army: You only sign up if it's the only thing you could ever imagine doing. Clark, I can not imagine spending a moment of my life without you. I promise that I will always have your back, as you will always have mine. You're my best friend, you're my home, and you are my true love, and I am yours and will be forever.
However, before Clark read these vows, which include wisdom from Lois’ father, Lois shared advice from her mother: “The ones you love are always with you.” Since Lois’ earlier doubts had gotten Clark to reconsider if Lois (or loved ones in general, like his parents) were standing in the way of his destiny, Ella’s words reminded him of what he learned in the dark period between Doomsday and Metallo, which was burying people in your past to make way for a future is more detrimental because it’s avoiding truth instead of dealing with it. So when Lois suggested Clark guess the kind of advice Jonathan would give him on his wedding day, it not only reinforced the idea that Jonathan was still in Clark’s heart, it also highlighted one of the reasons Clark loves Lois: her ability to ground him and remind him of who he is beneath the clutter of doubt.
Clark was buoyed even more when Lois told him they were a “perfect fit” both because of, and in spite of, the imperfection or “messy” nature of their lives. For a time, it had been hard for Lois to believe what Carter Hall had told her in Shield—that “with every great relationship, comes a great burden, and the strength to carry it,” especially when her experience in Prophecy made her realize that the “burden” needed to be accepted was that there were some things that couldn’t be helped. Or, as Clark put it when he tried to reassure her, “there will always be a balance of good and evil in the world, but it’s up to me to tip the scale.” Although neither Clark’s alien nor his human side represent darkness or light specifically, the balance he needed to find in his life between those two aspects of himself—alien and human—and the balance he and Lois needed to find between love and duty is the same kind of balance the show posited needed to “exist between light and darkness” (e.g. Prophecy, Finale). So when Lois changed her mind to say they were a perfect fit because of their mutual baggage, the doubts she'd awakened in Clark, when she broke off the engagement out her fear of detracting from his duty to the world, dissipated.
Ultimately, then, what Clark and Lois needed to believe, and helped each other believe, was that the answer to Clark's question, "What if heroes aren't destined to love?" was that love enhances a hero's life more than it complicates it. Since Lois believed in Clark and he believed in her, then she had to believe, to trust, that he was right; she would always be by his side helping him shoulder burdens and not in his way creating them. That as lacking as she was, Clark was lacking too, and only together could they make each other complete, thus strong. Lois had experienced relationships before with her father and with Oliver where she knew they loved her sincerely, but neither of those relationships made her feel equal and special simultaneously. So while all of Clark’s heartfelt expressions of love—from his “you’re the one and always will be” to his “you are the love of my life”—were poignant and cherished, they weren’t what would be sufficient if she and Clark were to share a life together as partners (Fortune, Harvest). Partners like her parents who had been “in it together,” and like Clark’s parents whose teamwork to help the people of Smallville one “rainy day” assuaged Martha’s doubts that she’d “made a huge mistake following Jonathan to a small town” (Patriot, Hostage). In short, partners who are better together and make the world better together because they fill in each other’s gaps and share each other’s burdens, which would be impossible to do if Lois believed Clark was such an infallible god that he had no deficiencies.
Let me not to the marriage of true minds / Admit impediments. Love is not love / Which alters when it alteration finds, / Or bends with the remover to remove: / O no! it is an ever-fixed mark / That looks on tempests and is never shaken -- William Shakespeare, Sonnet 116
Being in love with someone is easy, but loving someone—truly loving them—is hard because believing in someone and relying on someone is hard. Yet, as Clark told Darkseid in the Finale, it’s “stronger to love.” So instead of surrendering to the fear of losing his childish illusions, which he did in his relationship with Lana, and instead of surrendering to the cynical need for control, which he did whenever he decided to push people away and be alone, Clark pledged his life to the woman he said could see into his soul and love him completely and unconditionally, and for whom he could do the same. And instead of worrying when Clark would “let her stand with him” (Patriot), and then fearing she would just be standing in his way after he did, Lois actually let herself stand with Clark, believing at last that she was more an asset than a liability. So rather than letting "fear decide love" (Icarus), their "perfect love cast out fear" (1 John 4:18).
Sharing their vows before their wedding may have been breaking with tradition, but it gave Lois and Clark a chance to do what they do best and what makes them true loves who’ll stand the test of time: they faced the darkness of their doubts together by believing in their vows to each other. Not only does that mean Clark agrees that Lois is his “best friend…home…and true love,” it also means Lois believes Clark isn’t so godlike or perfect that he doesn’t need her. Furthermore, if Clark had felt any doubts about his love for Lois or was in any way denying a part of himself, like his human side, he would not have been able to defeat Darkseid. How wonderful that in the end love really did conquer all because it was pure love—whole and true!
With scant evidence to support the claim that the Blur is an infallible idol to Lois, one might wonder if there’s proof she at least yearns for a mate of that caliber. There isn’t. If anything, Lois was wary of perfection after struggling for years with her own flaws.
Lois Lane Doesn't Need Perfection
The only lofty thing that attracts Lois is lofty ideals; she's never needed a man to woo her with perfection or grand gestures. In Crimson, for instance, Lois expresses relief that in Clark she’s finally found the normal guy she desired. She doesn’t need Clark to be “macho,” “wear a costume,” or be all “over the papers” because the “dorky farm-boy thing” is more to her liking, just like Graham Garret’s flashy businessman overtures were unnecessary in her view (Fade). Clark’s attempts to make everything perfect for his proposal years later (Icarus), and Lois’ attempts to go against Clark’s plans of which she’s oblivious, also illustrate such affinities, well, perfectly. When Clark speeds off to switch coats, Lois playfully calls him a “show off,” and when he tries to woo her with the promise of “churros and hot chocolate” from Madrid for dessert Lois says she’d rather settle down at home away from the spotlight with a few donuts.
Similarly, when getting ready to move away from Smallville in Kent, Lois admits that while leaving the one place that ever felt like home to her was tough, the truth was her home wasn’t the place Smallville, but the man. “This Smallville, right here,” she says placing a hand over Clark’s heart, is “all I’ll ever need. And if you need to move to Metropolis because that’s who the world needs you to be, then a studio apartment with rusty pipes is just fine for me.” What does this show? It shows Lois doesn’t prefer the ideal man the Blur represents or the ideal home Smallville represents, because she realizes they’re just romanticized abstractions while the heart of the man she loves (who is both hero and man harmoniously combined) is what’s real and true.
Liability or Asset
Finally, in Clark, Lois had the dependability often denied her as an itinerant army brat whose father’s distance and disapproval taught her to fear failure so much she resisted depending on others, getting attached to others, trusting others, and trusting herself. In fact, Lois learned early on to view any imperfection on her part as a burden on others. So it was understandably hard for Lois to come around to the idea that she wouldn’t hold Clark back in any way. Grand gestures and a grand destiny were, therefore, of no importance to Lois because what she desired most, and what she ultimately got from Clark, wasn't to be impressed, but to be cared for just the way she was. Moreover, perfection in a mate was more likely to intimidate than captivate Lois.
Three relationships defined Lois Lane’s childhood: her relationship with her father, with her sister, and with her mother. Lois’ relationship with her father wasn’t like any typical father/daughter relationship because without his wife’s influence General Sam Lane lost sight of how to treat his family like family. Instead, he rarely participated in the ordinary, human aspects of family life and elected to treat his girls, especially Lois, as soldiers not daughters. As a result, Lois didn’t grow to “know the first thing about family time or dinners at home” (Persuasion). Unfortunately, according to Ambush, Ella Lane used to keep her husband’s penchant for getting lost in duty in check by reminding him to savor the “simple things” in life—the things that make one “human”—and to “spend more time with the family.” Because Sam didn’t, and instead “instituted a chain of command” that made Lois both the mother to her little sister and the scapegoat if anything went wrong, Lois developed insecurity about her own worth.
For years Lois had tried to be everything her father wanted her to be, but she couldn’t do it, and as a result she stopped trying; that didn’t make the underlying insecurities go away, though. When Lois first arrived on the show, she was “independent and self-sufficient” just like her father raised her to be. The way she wanted to be seen as capable of taking care of herself and others, like she did when she said she didn’t know how Clark survived without her (Gone), and the way she wanted to be seen as on par or even superior to guys, like she did when she sought to win a drinking contest against them (Recruit), were artifacts of the years she tried to gain her father’s attention and approval by being most like the military men around her. When that didn’t work, she rebelled. Meanwhile, Lois’ sister, Lucy, flourished with the pressure off her and firmly on her big sister. That is, until her perfection got her shipped off to boarding school. There perfection was so much harder to achieve, it prompted Lucy to turn to trouble as well. Years later, in Ambush, Lois admitted “that a part of [her] sort of liked the fact that [Lucy] turned into the troublemaker, because [she] was finally able to be the good one.” Being the “good” daughter or the “perfect” daughter came at a price, however.
In Ambush, Lois’ attempts to solidify her position as the good one in her father’s eyes revealed the problems with this particular approach. Before the day even got going, Lois took Clark aside and warned him that even though she thought he was fine the way he was, her father wouldn’t be satisfied with anything less than perfection from him or from her. The rest of the day, Clark notices the change in Lois’ behavior, and he is so unsettled by it he confronts General Lane, telling him “It's no wonder Lois is too afraid to be herself around you.” This enrages the General initially, but by the end of the episode he says, “Clark, I owe you an apology. […] You were right. I have not always been a perfect father.” Exposing perfection for its insidiousness and elusiveness bore more fruit that evening, as it inspired Lois and Lucy to admit that all their time spent “trying to be the perfect daughter” made them “forg[et] how to be sisters.” Worrying about and seeking perfection was, consequently, established as robbing individuals of the capacity to have truthful and functional relationships. Such an epiphany took years to form, and yet the events of Ambush were still only a step toward greater progress.
For Lois, the hardest belief to shatter was that her imperfections made her too much of a burden. When Lois wasn’t “the good one,” and Lucy was the “freakin’ perfect” one, Lois believed that she became nothing more than “a spare piece of luggage” to her father (Lucy). In her view, people who are great and who have great destinies as a result, will, and naturally should, leave behind anyone who might jeopardize or interfere with that destiny. Accordingly, Lois thought she and Oliver had “no future” because he was “a world renowned billionaire,” an “icon” whose “life was going” somewhere where “there wasn’t room” for her, and whose “role in the world” was too “important” and his “destiny” was “so much greater” that she felt he was duty bound to leave her, “a nail-biting, Talon dwelling” reporter who just “writes about” him, behind (Rage, Toxic, Siren). So, imperfection equaled limitation in Lois’ eyes. The detrimental effect this belief had on Lois and Clark was explored in Season 10’s Abandoned.
Lois’ struggle to finally confront a glaring example of what, to her, was her greatest moment of weakness, Clark’s struggle to overcome his self-doubt following his father’s rebuke, and Ella’s and Jor-El’s mutual struggle to let their children see them at their weakest were threads that came together in Abandoned to suggest that it’s stronger to share one's flaws than to hide them. Abandoned began by informing viewers that, for 15 years, Lois hid a box of her mother’s things in a closet because it reminded her of her failure to visit her deathbed. Only later did Lois discover her mother not only requested she not visit, but she’d left behind taped messages for Lois to guide her growing up. Meanwhile, Clark avoided sharing how ashamed and hurt he still was by Jor-El’s renunciation of him only to discover that the flesh and blood Jor-El back on Krypton had felt similarly ashamed of himself and had promised to retain his faith in his son’s ability to become “Earth’s greatest savior.”
Both revelations caused a shift in attitude and perspective for Lois and in Clark. Lois realized letting her perceived weaknesses scare her away from who she loved (e.g. Clark), like Ella’s fears kept her away, is a mistake that causes more pain than it prevents. Similarly, Clark realized not sharing his shame with those he loves (e.g. Lois), like Jor-El not supporting him via his Fortress because of his own regrets, was also a mistake. Trying to understand, Clark said, “Maybe our parents thought that their mistakes would be some sort of burden on us.” Prompting Lois to draw her own conclusion that their parents were wrong to strip away a part of them “that’s very human” because now it was easy to see that, counter to what she and Clark had grown to believe, what burdens others isn’t imperfection but perfection. Thus the lesson Lois’ and Clark’s parents taught them in Abandoned was a valuable one—one that would have helped them earlier in their relationship and would need to be remembered going forward if they were to be a success.
After several months of dating, which occurred a little less than a year before the events of Abandoned, Lois and Clark in Persuasion neared a critical moment in their relationship which, with the help of gemstone kryptonite poisoning, brought up Lois’ fundamental insecurity about her flaws. On Valentine’s Day of all days, a Chloe who had been compelled to protect Clark at all costs told Lois, “I’ve seen Clark in love before and it always holds him back.” Lois tried to defend herself, but Chloe hit back harder. She accused Lois of being untrustworthy and told her the “Martha Stewart makeover thing” she was doing—compelled to do because a kryptonite infected Clark told her to be more “traditional”—wasn’t going to work because Clark would eventually know the “real” Lois and see she’s “just a scared little kid." Her advice to Lois? “If you really love him, the best thing you can do for Clark is leave him.” Rattled, Lois called Clark home to tell him through her tears that she believed “Chloe was right to protect” him from her and right to say she was “going to wreck” everything. “I’m not good for you, Clark,” Lois confessed, revealing once more that her core insecurity was that her faults were too cumbersome and detrimental to share with anyone, especially someone she loved and for whom she wanted only the best.
Chloe’s warning to Lois that she would “hold Clark back” echoed with even more threatening significance when Lois eventually discovered Clark was none other than the Blur, her hero. The scars Lois’ other heroes (The General and Oliver) left behind ran deep, so it was natural for her thoughts to turn to her shortcomings again. She worried her impulsiveness, recklessness, and non-hero status would all be liabilities: she could get hurt; be used as a pawn; and instead of sharing the burden of his responsibilities she’d only be a distraction and a weakness. Thus it was difficult to convince Lois in Shield that she wouldn’t be “the one thing that holds [Clark] back or stands in [his] way,” and instead would be “the one who,” according to Carter, made Clark’s “burden easier to bear.”
Maybe I need you / Here in this world on fire -- "Baby I Need You," Kim Taylor, Homecoming
The only reason Lois was previously able to embrace loving a hero, like she did in Infamous when she said it was “different” with Clark, was because Clark made her feel needed. Therefore, recapturing this feeling was crucial, especially since, according to the conversation Lois had with Oliver in Bride, she only felt safe to express her affection for Clark while dancing at Chloe’s wedding reception because she “thought, just for a minute [he] needed [her].” Consequently, one might think having Clark—a year into dating—confess to Lois that she “was the one” he “always needed” would have been comforting to her. However, Clark’s words needed to be backed up by action. Lois thought her discovery that Clark was the Blur through his kiss in Salvation meant he "needed her after all" (Lazarus), but his continued inability to honor her request for honesty made her doubt his sincerity. So, throughout the ensuing season Lois sought reassurances that she was indispensable to Clark.
Patriot, as well as the trio of episodes Supergirl, Fortune, and Prophecy written by Anne Cofell Saunders, delved deeply into Lois’ struggle to handle the perceived imbalance between her and Clark. Because of Carter Hall’s encouragement in Shield, Lois decided to return to Metropolis to test whether she really could be the one to ease Clark’s burdens. First, she spoke to Kara about the concerns she previously brought up with Carter (Hawkman) about not being a fellow hero, which his wife Shayera (Hawkgirl) had been. She asked Kara, “Maybe it's easier to be a hero when you don't have somebody tying you down. I'm sure you think of people without powers as well, differently?” Mind you, Lois didn’t think of people with powers differently. She did, however, worry that people with powers viewed people without them differently. So when Kara responded that “it's easy for people to just see the powers and not the person behind them. I guess even heroes need someone to come home to,” Lois felt somewhat reassured. Somewhat because as long as Clark kept the secret that he was “the person behind” the Blur, Lois couldn’t be completely confident that she was the “someone” he should “come home to.” Thus, when Clark told Lois about his secret identity in Isis—an event celebrated annually for years to come according to Homecoming—and trusted her with all the knowledge of his alien side in Harvest, he resolved many of her concerns. Yet the events of Patriot would prove that the secret was just the tip of the iceberg.
Throughout Patriot, Lois’ eyes were opened to how much Clark was still shielding from her. Taking the lessons of Jor-El and Ella from Abandoned to heart, Clark had shared with Lois his shame and anxiety about not being “invincible” enough to defeat Darkseid’s looming darkness preying on doubts and mistrust. Yet he hadn’t let Lois know about his work with the Justice League or how to communicate and collaborate with him and them. Lois had to discover Clark’s League activities on her own, and only after Oliver had confided in her that Clark, and thus the world, would "need" her if their mission to investigate the VRA operations went badly. In other words, Lois was assured Clark, the man, needed her but not so much Clark, the hero, which was most relevant to her concerns. She needed to have him demonstrate his willingness to share even more of his burdens with her if she was to feel assured. A meeting with super spouses, Aquaman and his wife Mera, inspired progress on this issue as Mera shared with Lois both wisdom and encouragement. “It took months and more than a few water blasts to the head” for her husband to let her “stand with him, not just beside him,” Mera recalled. She also told Lois that even though she wasn’t “like Clark” (i.e. not a superpowered superhero), she was “what he need[ed]” because she treated him not “as [a] superior but as an equal” and insisted “he do the same.” So when Clark welcomed Lois to Watchtower as an equal member of the team, Lois was further persuaded that Mera was right when she said she made a “good partner” for Clark despite their differences.
Reassured by the progress made in Patriot, Lois became more and more confident about her relationship with Clark. Like she said in Icarus, she wouldn’t have “said yes” to Clark’s proposal of marriage if she didn’t already believe what Clark later said after their engagement party: “We can handle both” our relationship and our responsibilities “as long as we stay together.” So emboldened was Lois that she exclaims, “Well, then nothing can stop Mr. and Mrs. Kent.” She even playfully thrusts her flaws or, in this case, her quirks in his face saying, “Hey, I signed up for a double life. You signed up for news with ice cream. I’m a journalism junkie. What are you gonna do?” But come her bachelorette party in Fortune, Lois was less secure. Her lack of confidence wasn’t something which had been building. Rather, it was something triggered suddenly as a result of a misunderstanding and events beyond her control.
Not knowing that Zatanna had spiked their champagne to intoxicate her and her guests to an incredible (some might say magical) degree, Lois saw her drunken night gambling and losing her engagement ring as a sign that she was too careless and chaotic. Unknown to Lois, it’s a concern Clark shared about his own behavior that night. “I can’t believe on my first drunken night out, I lose Lois. I commit a felony and I land my friend in jail. So reckless,” he chastised himself at the Watchtower. It’s Tess who actually reminds Clark that, yes he was reckless, but also “oddly […] very human.” Oliver tries to do the same for Lois who’s still adamant that Clark would never “lose his ring” doing something rash like she did. “We’re all a mess. Okay? Let’s be fair,” Oliver says. Unconvinced, Lois replies, “Not Clark. […] Do you have any idea how much pressure there is being engaged to walking perfection?” Picking up on her hyperbole, Oliver tells Lois that he does understand because he struggles with the same feeling “fighting crime with walking perfection” (something explored in Season 6’s Rage). Clark’s disgust with his own recklessness in Fortune, as well as the fear he had of losing Lois that night, made it so he and viewers saw that he actually felt the same pressure to live up to his own standards of perfection.
So, Zatanna's magic elixir gave Lois and Clark a night that forced them to face their insecurities about not being in control and not being perfect--possibly one of the best pre-wedding experiences a bride and groom could have because part of being married means dealing with one another's flaws and with the fickle fortunes of life. Indeed, by the time Lois and Clark reunited the following evening, Lois had discovered she lost her ring because the casino she and Oliver had gambled at while drunk had actually swindled her. Despite the fact that her expertise at cards made her certain of success (she wouldn’t have made any bet if the ring if it hadn’t been “a sure thing”), the casino cheated to make her lose for their own financial gain. Since she hadn’t been as careless as she originally feared, and because Clark offered her reassurances that he’d want to marry her no matter what, Lois was once more put at ease that her flaws or "baggage" wouldn't weigh Clark down. But was it enough?
According to some supporters of other love interests for Clark Kent on Smallville, Lois Lane loved the Blur and was loved by the Blur not only because neither cared for Clark’s human side, but also because she worshipped the Blur as an infallible god. To understand why such an accusation is unwarranted, one must examine the validity of some of the examples used to argue against Lois and the true nature of her love and faith in Clark.
Figuratively Speaking
Since Lois has occasionally likened Clark to an infallible and inspirational god, it’s mildly understandable why some would view Lois’ treatment of Clark with skepticism. Yet when given proper context it’s clear that Lois was speaking metaphorically rather than literally, and was simply expressing her faith and unconditional love, and in one instance outright joking.
Before delving into Smallville, however, a word about the use of Biblical allegory in narratives seems warranted. C.S. Lewis, best known for The Chronicles of Narnia series of novels, has said that “stories and myths, both in the Bible as well as outside it, bear truth insofar as they resonate with [the] true story” of the Bible. Agreeing with Lewis is scholar and author John Granger who has studied Lewis and Tolkien (The Lord of the Rings) closely and has written extensively about the Biblical aspects of the Harry Potter series. In his view, the “popularity” of stories like The Lord of the Rings and Superman, “especially when they are crafted creatively, owes to our natural resonance” with Biblical stories. Scenes in modern day works of fiction “are not the gospel, and they don’t pretend to be. But it may just be that the truth of [the Bible] speaks through key episodes in these stories, whether or not the authors intended it” (source). While some, especially those who are atheist or for whom the Bible is not a part of one’s faith, might dislike such allegories, their use alone does not mean specific characters are usurping or aping Biblical figures or that they are treated as such by others. So, the allusions to the Bible and other myths, which were a common occurrence on Smallville throughout its ten year run, are not only okay, they also do no harm to the narrative or to the characterization of Lois, Clark, or their relationship.
In addition, Lois relied on figurative language every so often to articulate her thoughts and feelings about Clark’s superhero alter ego, the Blur, because figurative language—metaphor, analogy, symbols, and even allegory—is often used to describe novel concepts and to stimulate one’s imagination as a means of enhancing feeling and understanding in a way that cannot be conveyed with a words’ dictionary meaning alone. Lois employed such figurative language in the Season 10 episodes Shield and Harvest. In Shield, Lois is in Egypt still reeling from the discovery that Clark is the Blur. Desperate to express her tumultuous emotions, Lois uses an analogy which equates herself to the goddess Isis and Clark to the god Ra. When Carter Hall asks Lois if she truly believes the guy “sitting across” from her was Ra out of a mistaken concern that she might suspect he or Clark of being special (i.e. Hawkman, the Blur), Lois says “No, of course not.” She proceeds to rattle off questions about what life must be like for someone with extraordinary powers. Similarly, in Harvest when Clark asks Lois about dating an alien, she reassures him by saying “it’s like dating a god or Bono.” No one would ever argue that Bono is a god, so why anyone would conclude that Lois’ statement means she genuinely believes Clark's a god is a mystery. Clearly in both episodes Lois doesn’t actually believe Clark is a god. She simply saw his tremendous power and influence as having some similarities to larger than life individuals like mythological Eygptian deities or rock stars and used analogies and figurative language to discuss her feelings about being in a relationship with someone as unique as Clark.
Harvest has the distinction of having yet another scene often used as an erroneous example of Lois venerating Clark as a god. The episode takes place primarily in a village of austere religious folks who call themselves The Believers. Their experience of tragedy on the day of the first meteor shower and the bounty they received afterwards, as a result of blue kryptonite, made them fanatical and capable of depowering Clark. Lois’ only hope for escape from their ritual sacrifice was to use their own superstitions against them. So when Clark miraculously saved her from being killed in view of the villagers she preached, “It's a sign. Move back, way back...far away from him. You are not worthy to be in his presence. Drop your weapon and beg for forgiveness. No I don't think you get it, he is a messenger sent from the heavens.” The villagers, awestruck and frightened, start to move back but not enough to restore Clark’s powers completely. Emboldened, Lois continues, “If you don't listen he will strike down upon thee, with great vengeance and furious anger, and he will use his-his heat vision to raise your village and his super breath to smite your crops.” What the villagers didn’t know and likely many of Lois’ detractors don’t know, is the latter dialogue was a paraphrase of a famous speech from the classic, Pulp Fiction. In short, Lois was vamping in a theatrical manner to escape death. She did not literally believe Clark was the kind of messiah figure she described him as.
Flaws and Faith
Using metaphors and theatrical diversions do not indicate that Lois truly treated Clark as an actual god, and the times her faith and unconditional love for her hero led her to believe he was an inspirational figure who would never let her or anyone else down don’t indicate it either. Many people can be inspirational without being godlike or perfect. Parents, teachers, soldiers, actors—it doesn’t matter. So there is nothing wrong with Lois saying in Homecoming that “many people in the world” have been “inspired” by the Blur and that he is a worthy “role model for kids” to “look up to.” There is likewise nothing wrong with Lois, at one point, sharing Clark's own belief in his invincibility. In Doomsday, before Lois had gotten to know the Blur more closely, she suspected he was “invincible” (as did Clark) and was devastated to discover he was not. Not because she needed him to be indestructible to admire him, but because she was upset to think of the world potentially losing a great hero and her losing a new friend.
Lois felt the Blur was inspirational and accepted the Blur wasn’t invincible, but could she believe he wasn’t infallible too? It’s a question John Corben posed to Lois in Metallo when he asked how to hold the Blur “accountable” if “he screws up.” Her response, asking "After everything The Blur's done for the world, how can you be such a cynic?” suggests Lois felt more confidence in the Blur was warranted given his impressive record up until that point. Corben remained unmoved by her optimism, though. Instead, he chose to mock Lois as a “softhearted hero worship[per].” He was, of course, being hyperbolic just as Lois was later when she called Corben a “hero hater.” Flabbergasted, Lois concluded it was impossible for anyone reading about all of the Blur’s heroic deeds across the country to not “see how great he was.” It’s difficult to blame Lois in this instance considering how tough it is to believe that anyone would hate someone who has dedicated their life to helping people, and had yet to do anything not “great” to warrant antipathy of any kind. The only source of negativity one can conceive of would have been distrust of a being with superpowers; yet such a prejudiced opinion wouldn’t, and shouldn’t, have held any weight for Lois.
Lois’ perception of the Blur’s fallibility or lack thereof was highlighted again in Season 10’s Supergirl due to the pundit “Glorious” Gordon Godfrey’s threatened crusade to take down heroes as well as their defenders. Godfrey’s attempt to expose Green Arrow’s identity and tarnish Supergirl’s reputation, as part of this initiative, motivated Lois to risk her life to expose Godfrey for the sick and hypocritical man he was. After narrowly escaping death because of Clark’s and Kara’s intervention, Lois listens as Clark suggests heroes aren’t worth that kind of sacrifice considering they can’t be relied upon to always come to the rescue of those in need. Lois’ response shows that she understands that superpowered people “are people too” because “they wrestle with their own flaws” like everyone else, but it also shows her desire to support Clark. By saying, “the Blur is different. He's my hero. No matter what he's afraid of I know he will always be there for me,” Lois provided Clark encouragement in the face of growing public doubt. It’s something she repeated in the following episode, Homecoming, as well. In the episode, Clark sympathizes with the growing distrust in him and other heroes because he feels it’s understandable for people not to “want to put their hope in someone who is going to let them down.” Lois counters that she can’t see it the same way because in her view the Blur “never would let us down.” So she’ll “stand by her hero no matter how much mud” is slung at him. Incredulous, Clark asks Lois why she has so much faith in the Blur. “Because, that's what you do when you believe in someone,” she answers.
Rather than statements of god worship, these are statements of unconditional love which the Bible describes in 1 Corinthians. 13: 4-8 as a sentiment that “keeps no record of wrongs” and “bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.” It means acknowledging the failings of another, but choosing to forgive them their faults and, as a result, to continually acquire renewed faith that they’ll do better in the future. Lana asked this of Clark in Wrath when she demanded that Clark stop putting her on a pedestal, acknowledge her ownership of her flaws, and “love [her] no matter what.” Her request was fruitless, which is telling because Clark clearly sees such belief, or unconditional love, as the epitome of true love. Indeed, Clark described love in Calling as being an indescribable feeling that “when you have it, you trust it, and you believe in it”—something so beautifully echoed in Clark’s wedding vows which said to Lois, “You’ve always believed in me, and I believe in you. When you believe in someone it’s not for a minute, or just for now, it’s forever.” Thus, Lois wasn’t telling Clark she thought the Blur was worthy of her confidence because she believed he was fearless or flawless, but because she wanted him to understand that what she felt about him wasn’t conditional.
Feeling and embracing that he could be, and in many cases was, believed in and loved unconditionally as a public superhero was important for Clark because the burden of perfection he had placed on himself since he began his heroic mission was preventing him from fulfilling his true potential. As early as Prey--when Clark was still healing from Lana's departure in Arctic and before he started anything romantic with Lois--he berated himself for not being the "city's savior" simply because some "innocent people die[d] on [his] shift." Clark repeats this refrain in Season 9 and Season 10. In Idol, he warns the Wonder Twins that "Heroes don't get second chances, and people need you to make life-and-death decisions every day. There's no room for mistakes." Then, in the following season's Homecoming, he reminded Brainiac 5 that he doesn't have "the privilege of mistakes" because "even if [heroes] don't expect perfection from [them]selves the rest of the world does." So, it may actually be more logical to suggest Clark viewed himself and his role in the manner of which Lois is falsely accused.
Clark's problems--and, more importantly, his rigid expectations--were not magically solved with a quick fix in Homecoming, despite Brainiac 5's insight and encouragement. Clark still thought he needed to "be invincible" and was "terrified" that he wasn't, for instance (Patriot). Part of the reason Clark was so hard on himself was because he felt he was wanting in the eyes of his two fathers. Not only did Clark think he was "supposed to be" a "strong, unshakeable force" like Jor-El (Abandoned), but he also thought Jonathan "never had [a] problem" facing trials successfully (Lazarus). It took Jonathan reassuring Clark that he was "far away from perfect" (Lazarus) and Lois reaching out to Jor-El on Clark's behalf (Abandoned) for him to really turn a corner. At the Fortress, Lois implored Jor-El: "Your son needs a father who believes in him. I wish knowing that I love him was enough, but Clark can’t really hear it with the ghost of your disappointment haunting him. You’re stopping him from fulfilling his potential." Apparently inspired, the Fortress revealed a decades old message from Clark's flesh and blood parents (in holographic form) which echoed Lois' encouraging words from Supergirl and Homecoming. "I will never lose faith in you,” said Jor-El to his son. Thus, Lois' faith, like Jor-El's faith, wasn't the faith of a disciple for his or her god, but heartfelt belief for someone she loved unconditionally.
Now, since unconditional love, as Lana asserted in Wrath, doesn’t mean ignoring a person’s flaws, it’s useful to note the times when Lois acknowledged the Blur’s faults. Lois has a history of pointing out Clark’s flaws as well pre-secret reveal, but it’s not worth delving into given that it is not what’s in dispute here. Instead, the focus is on Lois' treatment of the Blur. In Echo, for instance, Clark initially thinks he successfully saved hostages from a bomber, yet Lois doesn’t struggle with the subsequent revelation that the so-called bomber he subdued was innocent; she bluntly points out the Blur’s carelessness. What happens in Idol is a bit more complicated. Clark’s decision to stop calling Lois as the Blur after cultivating a special partnership with her between Doomsday and Metallo, upsets Lois so much that she continues to point out the Blur’s blunders like she did in Echo. Except instead of expressing total faith in him despite the mistakes, she acts positively thorny towards him and even puts on a pretense of cynicism to show her displeasure. Her first encounter with what appears to be a “botched save” (thanks to the meddling Wonder Twins), causes Lois to not only conclude that the Blur’s “probably tailspinning into the stratosphere because he doesn't have his go-to girl to keep him grounded,” but to also admit she was “beginning to lose faith in our resident hero.” Another blunder inspires her to further express her underlying disappointment that the Blur isn’t calling her by again suggesting his errors illustrate that without her “his ego” was becoming “really supersized.”
With things getting out of hand, Clark finally decides to reconnect with Lois as the Blur on the phone to straighten things out, giving Lois an opportunity to express her discontent directly. “There's a way you treat a woman. It's called respect,” and being “some fancy hero” is no excuse, Lois tells the Blur, clearly showing her perception of him is not unerringly reverent. Lois doesn’t let go of this gripe either—not after she discovers Clark is the Blur (via a wonky phone connection) or after Clark concedes he believes she was telling the truth that “deep down” her “faith in the Blur never wavered.” In short, in her heart Lois never doubted the Blur (unconditional love or belief), but that didn’t stop her from rightly identifying and criticizing the Blur for errors like abruptly and inexplicably ending their phone calls without so much an explanation or a goodbye, or for letting impostors get away with so much damage.
Finding out Clark was the Blur in Season 10 didn’t affect Lois’ ability to acknowledge such flaws either, since she continued to address mistakes he made in his Clark and Blur identities. For instance, in Masquerade Lois takes Clark to task for putting his identity in jeopardy. She says, “I will stand by you no matter what,” but “is that really the life you want for yourself?” Because this one scene illustrates her ability to challenge Clark, her unconditional love or belief in Clark, and her understanding of his dual identity, it disproves the claim that Lois was a blind worshiper and sycophant of the Blur. It also shows the quintessence of the Lois and Clark relationship:
Lois doesn't treat Clark like a god, but she loves him and he loves her the way the Bible says God loves humanity. For God is also said to see our flaws--our sin--yet loves us and believes in us anyway.
Over a year and a half ago (before Smallville's final season ended), Yahoo Contributor, Rolando Cruz, posted an article evaluating the three women in Clark's life which is only now getting noticed. Regardless of what the initial intent of drawing attention to this article was, what's clear now is how faulty its assessments are. So, since facts and logic were scarce in Mr. Cruz's article, I thought I'd throw in my two (plus more) cents.
LANA
YAHOO'S OPINION: Farm breed and raised next door to Clark, Lana was the Man of Steel's first love. Never mind that she somehow ends up being duped into marring Lex Luther (Michael Rosenbaum) by season six (in the episode "Promise"), or that she has relationships with Whitney Fordman (Eric Johnson), Adam Knight (Ian Somerhalder), and Jason Teague (Jensen Ackles) along the way. After all this show spans 10 seasons and Lana spent a good deal of those seasons trying to get a little bit of honesty out of Clark Kent. But let's put all that aside. In the end, Lana never stops loving Clark and in a moment of self sacrifice she leaves Smallville so she doesn't interfere with Clark's ultimate destiny. So how would Lana fare if she were to marry Clark Kent? First, there is their mutual attraction, coupled that with the fact that they have a friendship based on shared history and you have the start of a good relationship. Add to that the fact that Lana grows from a tragic orphaned figure into a self assured woman who doubles as a superhero by season eight, and you end up with a compelling match for Clark. On a 10 point scale then, let's give Lana a solid 8 as a match for Clark. She would rate higher if she hadn't married the show's archvillain.
MY RESPONSE:
Lana was neither born nor raised on a farm. She was the daughter of parents who lived in Metropolis and her Aunt Nell was cosmopolitan in nature as well (Pilot). Both female Potters were small town girls who dreamed of living a big life outside of Smallville (X-Ray). Lana's Aunt Louise also fit this pattern (Relic). Lana was no different than any of her female ancestors. She dreamed of some day moving to Metropolis (Pilot), she was drawn away from Smallville and to Paris (Truth/Covenant, Apocalypse), and she loved living an adventurous life. Lana also enjoyed the power that comes with wealth and she loved globetrotting (Subterranean).
Lana was not duped into marrying Lex; she was blackmailed. There's no need to make Lana out to be some sort of naive rube. She knew exactly what she was doing when she agreed to marry Lex to protect Clark. If she didn't know, then one can't say she made a sacrifice. That said, it was perplexing to witness Lana--not soon after the wedding--finding ways around the threats to protect Clark in her own way, like countering Lionel's threat with her own using Martha's good opinion as a bargaining chip and trying to expose the truth about Lex to reporters (Noir). It's also odd to see her set up an elaborate death hoax to free her from Lex's and Lionel's clutches. Where was this ingenuity and courage when Lionel threatened Lana in the first place? Also, if what was actually meant by "duped" was related to Lex fooling Lana into believing she was pregnant with his child, then I'd like to point out that Lana was planning on leaving Lex for Clark in Promise despite that pesky detail.
The 10 seasons (really it was only Seasons 2-6) of Lana trying to get some honesty out of Clark Kent exemplifies one of the biggest reasons why Lana and Clark were not suited to each other. It was disturbing how reluctant Clark was to be honest with Lana and how often Lana would allow herself to get back into a relationship with Clark knowing full well he wasn't being honest (e.g. Visage, Mortal) considering how much of a deal breaker his honesty was to her. Lastly, Lana's insistence on the truth could also sometimes step over the line of respecting Clark. This is especially true when, selfish and impatient, Lana used her friend Chloe to trick Clark into revealing his powers (Promise). Bottom line: Clark and Lana were both in denial for most of their relationship and it wasn't fair to either of them. They kept trying to love each other and failed because they didn't love themselves first.
Clark and Lana were mutually attracted to each other and they were friends when they were fourteen years-old, but there came a point in their relationship where their moments of friendship were few and far between. For instance, even with Clark's big secret out of the bag and Lex out of the picture in Season 7, Clark and Lana still kept secrets from each other and Clark continued to divide himself between his romantic life with Lana and his friendship/partnership with Chloe. Furthermore, it's difficult to be a true friend to someone if you cannot see who they really are. While Clark couldn't be honest with Lana about his alien status, Clark couldn't see the real Lana because he put her on an idealized pedestal.
Lana did love Clark, in the end, but apparently not enough to make the sacrifice of her own emotions to patiently endure waiting to touch him while figuring out what to do about her kryptonite-infused Prometheus suit. Lana had to admit that she was too weak emotionally to honor Clark's request that they remain friends while they waited for a cure. Her last act on the show was to selfishly leave the man she loved broken because she did not have the strength to stay. Lana made several noble sacrifices for Clark, but when it came to sacrificing her own heart, she couldn't do it. Lana's sacrifice in Requiem had nothing to do with stepping away so Clark could have a clear path to his destiny, as his destiny was never in danger.
Other characters were capable of demonstrating self-sacrifice as well. Chloe sacrificed herself on multiple occasions (e.g. Fracture, Beast). And Lois proved herself capable of sacrificing her life and her happiness for Clark's well-being and destiny in episodes like Idol and Prophecy. Lois risked her life in Stiletto to save Clark from Bruno Manheim and Lois suffered mental anguish at the hands of Max Lord to protect the identity of Clark's alter ego.
Lana never did grow out of the "tragic orphaned figure," since she left the show tragic and alone. She didn't have to, though. She could have stayed in town to remain friends with Chloe and close to her Aunt Nell in Metropolis. She could have remained friends with Clark and worked with the JLA. She chose to leave. She chose to leave because deep down she wasn't the "self-assured woman" she's claimed to be. Lana once said in Void that she always felt alone in relationships because she couldn't touch her parents or connect with them. She also once admitted that she struggles with standing by the people she cares about while they suffer (e.g. she couldn't watch Jason die in Scare or visit Clark when he was sick in Fever). She was strong and independent when it came to risking her body, but not her heart because she was still carrying around the same darkness that kept her tragically alone throughout most of the series. In fact, she chose to change her physiology to create the illusion of self-assuredness. To truly leave the series self-assured, it would have been necessary to show Lana becoming a better version of her true self rather than becoming a female version of the man she loved.
Lana spoke on a few occasions about the deep connection to Clark she was only able to feel when she possessed his powers (e.g. Thirst, Wrath). By donning the Prometheus suit, Lana took a short cut to intimacy with Clark and robbed herself of true inner strength.
CHLOE
YAHOO'S OPINION: Before writers matched her up with Green Arrow, Chloe Sullivan looked like a girl who would hold a torch for Clark for as long as "Smallville" stayed on the air, so we know that she is at least attracted to Clark. Add to that that she had a crush on him long before she found out about his super powers and that she has been the most loyal friend that any superhero can hope for and you have the foundation for a good relationship. Bright, spunky, and driven, Chloe would make a supportive partner for Clark on those troublesome days when Jor-El messes with his head. Though she can get into her fair share of trouble, this computer geek/newspaper reporter has also helped Clark on a number of his adventures. The only big drawback to Chloe Sullivan, and unfortunately it's a big one, is that Clark has never reciprocated her love for him. Because of that, poor Chloe can rate no higher than a 6 or a 7 as a match for Clark Kent, which is too bad because Chloe Sullivan is a Lois Lane with a heart.
MY RESPONSE:
Both Lana (Exodus) and Lois (Committed) loved Clark before they knew he was super. Chloe's not unique in this regard.
Chloe was also hardly a loyal friend to Clark. Not only did she betray him to Lionel out of jealousy and anger in Exodus, but she also betrayed him several times throughout Seasons 8 and 9. She she lied to Clark about Davis (Eternal - Beast), she spied on Clark's private phone calls and put cameras around his house without his consent (Kandor, Idol), she put tracking chips in the passports Clark gave the Kandorians (Persuasion, Sacrifice), she stockpiled kryptonite weapons behind Clark's back (Conspiracy, Upgrade), and she failed to tell Clark about the Book of Rao (Hostage).
Chloe is bright, spunky, and driven, but she can also be deceitful, egotistical, jealous, passive aggressive, co-dependent, morally grey, and emotionally manipulative.
Chloe could be supportive when Clark was at odds with Jor-El, but she wasn't the only one. When Jor-El disowned his son and lost all faith in him, it was Lois who braved the Fortress to advocate on behalf of Clark. It was Lois's intervention in Abandoned that helped shift Clark's perception of his father and ultimately restored his faith in himself. Beyond Jor-El, when public sentiment began to sour towards the Blur, Lois offered her support--publicly in Idol and in conversations with Clark in Supergirl and Homecoming in which she expressed her faith in the Blur. When it comes to helping Clark out during his adventures, well, everyone from Pete to Lana to Lois to Tess served as valuable sidekicks at one point or another.
LOIS
YAHOO'S OPINION: Let's be honest, if he wasn't a Kryptonian superhero, Lois Lane would be the death of Clark Kent. Impulsive, head strong, and totally independent, Lois more often than not will place her own feelings ahead of Clark's. And while it's easy to picture Clark happy on a farm with either Lana or Chloe, it's hard to picture him on a farm with such a globetrotting wannabe. Yes, there is a mutual attraction here, and yes Lois Lane is a strong woman with a big enough backbone to butt heads with the Man of Steel. Yet in the end, the best role for Lois Lane to play, is that of a professional partner for Clark Kent. Heaven forbid these two should actually get married and attempt to have kids, since it would be poor Clark who would most likely end up changing diapers while Lois cover's the latest war halfway around the world. Though love can certainly change things around, I just wouldn't buy it in the case of these two. But the heart wants what it wants, so to be kind, let's rate Lois a 5 and hope that the writer's close out the show before getting deep into the "ever after" part of this relationship.
MY RESPONSE:
If someone chooses to base nearly all of his arguments for who is the most viable mate for Clark on the idea that he's a superpowered hero, then you can't take that element out of the equation just to make an illogical point. In other words, any rationale for who should be with Clark/Superman which begins with "if Clark wasn't a Kryptonian superhero" is already a failure because Clark is and always will be a Kryptonian superhero. You can't say Lois isn't compatible with a Clark that doesn't exist.
Lois's impulsive and headstrong nature does not automatically put Clark's life at risk. She'll either get herself out of her own jams or she'll be the one who gets hurt. Just for the sake of being fair, though, it's not like Clark didn't spend some time protecting Chloe from danger. And Clark, even with superpowers, is frequently at risk himself. Villains like Darkseid, Ultraman, Doomsday, Metallo, and various forms of magic and kryptonite aren't exactly keeping Mr. Kent safe and secure. Lois worries a lot about Clark, too, and puts her life on the line to protect him from dangerous threats. Lois also uses her reporter's pen to defend Clark from other forms of attack. As Doctor Fate told Lois once, "You are the one he will need. He is the one you will need" (Legends).
While Lois is impulsive, headstrong, and totally independent (all good qualities, by the way), she still prefers working with Clark as part of a team. She wants a partner and said as much to Chloe in Echo ("Maybe I don't have to carry the load all by myself...Clark and Lois versus the world"). In Harvest, Lois's impulsive and headstrong ways got her and Clark involved in a dangerous adventure with a village of deranged religious cultists. But, ultimately, the episode ended with Lois acknowledging that their relationship was only going to survive if they were "there for each other when times get tough." Like Lois said in her vows, she would always have Clark's back and he would always have hers, and like Clark said in his vows, Lois would always be there to bring him back if he got lost. Theirs is an equal and mutually beneficial relationship.
I'm not sure where the idea that Lois places her own feelings above Clark's more often than not came from. First of all, it's okay for Lois to put herself first sometimes. If she was always deferring to Clark and his needs, then they would have a pretty lopsided relationship. Second, it's just not true that Lois puts her own feelings first in the relationship. When Lois and Clark first started dating in Season 9, one of the issues they confronted almost immediately was Clark's many mysterious "assignments." How did Lois deal with Clark's secrecy and missed dates? She told him a little mystery might be good for the romance and encouraged him in his career. In the same episode, Conspiracy, Lois put off a date she wanted with Clark in order to give him a chance to meet with Faora who she believed was a source. There are too many examples to list, quite frankly. In Homecoming, Lois told Clark in the future: "If you need me, I am there, no deadline is more important then you, okay?" Lois also reassured Clark in Kent that "Smallville is my home Clark. Not this one. This Smallville, right here. You are all I ever need. And if you need to Metropolis because that's who the world needs you to be, then a studio apartment with rusty pipes is just fine for me."
Let's be clear: it's not relevant whether Lois would fit right in at the farm in Smallville. Why? Clark Kent's future is not on a farm in Smallville. When he became Superman, he became a globetrotting hero who doubled as a mild-mannered reporter in Metropolis. But suppose we put that important fact to the side and just focus on the idea that Lois and the farm don't go together. Lois was the only girl besides Lana who actually lived on the farm. In fact, she lived on the farm longer than Lana ever did. Also, it was Lois who was initially reluctant to sell the farm and move away to Metropolis because, to her, it was the only home she had ever known (Kent). Lois may not have always appreciated farm life, but she had no problem defending it and the values of small town America when she helped Jonathan Kent spread his "Heartland Message" during his victorious state senate campaign (e.g. Lockdown). In many ways, Lois was quite like Martha Kent. Both cultured city girls who fell in love with farmboys. Martha shared with Lois her struggles to accept living the life of a farmer's wife in both Hostage and Beacon and it helped Lois gain some valuable perspective. So unless one is prepared to say Martha's urban background made her an unsuitable mate for Jonathan, perhaps we should disregard this point for its sheer ridiculousness.
Lois isn't a "globetrotting wannabe" because to fit that description she would have to not actually be a globetrotter. Lois is a globetrotter. She lived all over the world in places like Bangkok because of her father's military job, and she's traveled pretty extensively as a reporter to places like Egypt and Mexico. In short, Lois is no wannabe. She's the real deal. At the same time, her adventurous spirit and occupation didn't stop her from telling Clark that she would "give up Africa" for him because "as important as her career" was to her, Clark was "more important" (Salvation).
Children would be a tough balancing act for both Lois and Clark, since both of them have demanding careers and responsibilities. If Lois would have to depend on Clark to change diapers so she could cover a war, then Clark would equally have to depend on Lois to change diapers when he has to leave Earth for Apokolips to fight Darkseid or when he has to join the JLA for a top secret mission. The fact that Lois is the only woman singled out as unfit for performing her proper duties as a farm wife and mother presents some not-so-subtle gender issues of Mr. Cruz, if you ask me.
LOIS LANE'S LOVE: Finding a Balance, Becoming Whole
By the time Lois and Clark’s love story on Smallville evolved from two close friends with a clear physical attraction determined to deny feelings for each other, to admitting those feelings to themselves and to each other, Clark’s approach to his identity had altered. Direct comparisons between Lana’s and Lois’ reaction to Clark’s special side are therefore unfair unless they grant that the Blur is an equally valid and noble part of Clark and that the divisions themselves are fluid. With that in mind, Lois deserves praise, not criticism, for her attraction to and acceptance of both sides of Clark without knowing they were one in the same, particularly because by encouraging him to trust himself, and by being the complement he needed, Lois helped Clark make peace with both sides of himself and finally become whole.
The Triangle for Two
For most of Clark’s life, his alien/hero side was kept private while his human side was public. As a teenager, Clark struggled to understand and accept himself as an alien. He did save people in secret using his extraterrestrial abilities, but he had not yet rendered himself as two distinct public identities. When Clark decided to aid the citizens of Metropolis as the Red-Blue-Blur (later the Blur) from Season 8 onwards, he still primarily kept his superpowered side in the shadows; yet his heroic alter ego was a distinct public identity regardless of how mysterious it was. At the start of Season 9 (Savior-Metallo) there was a slight shift whereby Clark was neither public nor private and the Blur was the identity through which Clark interacted with the world via phone or his burnt shield calling cards. That state was curtailed, however, because Lois’ return drew Clark back to his human life after only a three week absence. The only other shift came at the very end of the series when Clark and Superman were equally public identities. Consequently, one can admire Lana for reassuring Clark that he was the “same Clark Kent” to her (Phantom) back when his only concern was how she’d feel about his alien nature—something she never knew at all and which he had neither embraced or expressed fully yet.
At the same time, one can also admire Lois for caring for Clark first, then accepting all sides of him after he’d actually created a second persona that was an equally authentic expression of himself. It's important to remember that, according to her love confession via polygraph in Committed, Lois loved Clark before ever acknowledging the Red-Blue-Blur’s existence (something she didn’t do until Identity two episodes later). What initially attracted Lois to Clark were his looks, which she noticeably enjoyed as early as Crusade, and his virtue. To her, he was an “honorable” man (Reckoning) and a “good friend” (Exposed) who was “there for” her (Siren) and who knew her very well (Hydro). The final piece of the puzzle was a sense that Clark had greater aspirations to do more with his life (i.e. use his virtues to benefit others). So when Clark began to increasingly impress Lois as a “man of action” and partner through their daily interactions as fellow reporters, she could no longer stop herself from becoming smitten…or getting hurt. It was as Lois was healing from having her love for Clark go unrequited following Bride that Clark started to actively court her as the Red-Blue-Blur. His response to Lois’ open letter and kind words in Stiletto, and his support and trust of her in Doomsday when Clark appeared passive and dismissive, cultivated feelings in Lois for the Red-Blue-Blur that were based on her need for an unattainable fantasy guy who couldn’t break her heart and for a guy who would treat her as a needed partner.
Savior and Metallo continued to explore Lois' connection to the Blur while also hinting that the feelings Lois had developed for Clark endured even in the face of his seeming disinterest. Despite the unsettled status of her relationship with Clark, Lois couldn’t help but miss him terribly in his absence following Doomsday as seen in her sentimental looks at his nameplate, her visit to the farm, calls to Mrs. Kent, and her kidnapping of Shelby. He clearly left a hole that couldn’t be filled by just anyone—not by a regretful Oliver, not by John Corben, as much as he tried, and not by the Blur who, in Clark’s absence, increased his flirtation and partnership with Lois. Indeed, Clark’s phone calls to Lois as the Blur grew progressively intimate. In Savior, the Blur confides in Lois that he “can’t” disappear from her life like he was “supposed to” and then asks her to “promise” to keep their interaction a secret. Subsequently in Metallo, he calls Lois for help finding Corben and makes their rendezvous to discuss her findings sound like a date--and them sound like a couple--by describing their meeting place as “our phone booth.” Accordingly, Lois’ attraction to the Blur does not illustrate her preference for a superpowered alien hero over the mild-mannered Clark Kent. She had given Clark a chance and he had broken her heart, and then he began to cultivate a connection with her as the Blur when she was still very much in love with Clark (if her willingness to sleep with his alternate future self in Pandora is anything to go by).
Moreover, the connection between the Blur and Lois was based on his kindness and trust of her alone and flowed from Clark himself—all of him—his alien and human sides in harmony. As Clark explained at the end of Metallo, he was “trying to fill the void” of his singular Kryptonian Blur existence by calling Lois and “by hanging out on rooftops, eavesdropping on people—people who are connecting and living—thinking, what's the point of protecting life if you've lost your sense on how to live it?” Which only made him realize he couldn’t “completely stay away” from his human life, and more specifically, Lois, who Chloe observed “mean[t] something more” to Clark. To put it more simply, the Blur/Lois relationship during his grieving phase post-Doomsday allowed both him and Lois to maintain a connection to Clark and ultimately allowed them to connect with their whole selves. Through the Blur, Clark could show a side of himself to Lois he used to keep hidden through secrets and lies as a teenager and Lois could show a vulnerable side of herself she typically kept hidden through her bravado; in other words the most fragile parts of their souls.
Another area in which the Blur helped Lois and Clark connect was through their mutual altruism. In Hostage, Clark tells his mother that “talking to [Lois] as the Blur” allowed him to see “a different side of her” that made him “fall deeper” in love with her. In the same episode, Lois explains to Martha how talking to the Blur and helping him made her feel like she “had a higher purpose.” The purpose driven side of both Clark and Lois—the side they showed to each other through the Lois/Blur relationship—were sides they didn’t share with each other in their civilian lives. This was understandably a source of frustration for both of them, and something that needed to be resolved if they were to fulfill the promise of their relationship.
As individuals, Lois and Clark were drawn to the Blur—needed the Blur—because through him they got to connect with a higher purpose and to each other. But the deception required to maintain that distinct relationship naturally sparked conflict, especially as things reached a boiling point in Lois' and Clark’s personal and professional lives in Charade. In the episode, Clark asks Lois if he alone is enough after he, as the Blur, broke ties with her. Clark was asked to ponder the same question a year earlier in Hex and his conclusion was that a life without his hero side “felt empty." He said, the Blur “is who I am…every morning, I wake up with a purpose.” The Blur represented the same thing to Lois who, in Charade, says being with the Blur is “about more than what I want, who I want. It is something that is bigger than me.” For her, it wasn’t like what she had with Clark who, as covered before, was someone real and someone she loved. The Blur was more of a fantasy figure whose intimacy with Lois was rooted in their shared devotion to what Lois described as “a calling, a duty, to people, and the world.” Because Clark hid his special side, Lois believed Clark didn’t understand this when, in fact, he understood perfectly. He understood so well that he finishes her sentence describing the feelings they both had for each other as “selfish” in comparison to such duty, because he knows what it feels like to have “a whole world out there that needs you” that any indulgence in romance makes you feel as if you’re taking something “for yourself at someone else's expense.” Although it would take revealing his secret to improve his relationship with Lois, it’s clear neither Clark nor the Blur was enough for Lois or enough for Clark; both were valued and valid parts of their lives.
Coming Full Circle
In Season 10, when Clark was on the cusp of revealing his heroic side to the world as Superman and hiding his human side as a reporter with glasses and a meek and flaky attitude, he had a “breakthrough” about his multifaceted identity which affirmed that what Lois loved was the heart of the man and hero and what Clark needed most was to understand the truth about himself before he could share it with the rest of the world. He told Lois in Masquerade that he didn’t want to wear a mask as Superman because he didn’t “want to deny who” he was when “out there doing what [he] was born to do.” He didn’t want to disguise “the face of the man [his] parents raised” and “the face of the man” Lois loved. In other words, he had come to reject creating false dichotomies in his own perception of his identity based on others’ superficial perceptions of himself. To him, the more elegant and fitting approach was to let his actions “define what [he’s] called.” So the new bespectacled Clark Kent he presented to the world wouldn’t be the real Clark Kent, and Superman—the hero “out there in the red and blue […] saving people”—would be who he “really [was],” which is true. Superman, like the Clark Kent from Smallville, wears primary colors and does his best to selflessly protect people from darkness and harm through miraculous saves, leadership, and compassion. Thus, nothing about Superman is fake or untrue to who Clark is at heart—the heart Lois fell in love with.
It may have been buried under facades, but in truth the Blur/Superman and Clark aren’t different. Dichotomies may exist in terms of the way Clark presents himself superficially but when he’s interacting with the public as Superman or with his loved ones as the less bumbling Clark Kent, he is sharing equally true parts of himself. That Lois loved and admired the two forms through which Clark expressed his whole person before he revealed himself to her and to the world is not a reason to deride her simplistically as someone who only has an appreciation for the powers and status that comprise his grand destiny. Indeed, when Lois says in Isis that the bond between her and the Blur seemed similar to the bond she had with Clark because she felt she knew him, it’s obvious the way she knows (and loves) him is by his heart, which she got to know through her interactions with Clark and the Blur. Therefore, by believing in and validating both sides of Clark equally and by seeing them as indistinguishable expressions of the same person’s heart, Lois Lane proves she understood and loved both sides of Clark exceptionally well. No advocate for another love interest for Clark should therefore ever argue that the Blur, or Clark’s alien/hero side, is such an invalid, inferior, or odious part of Clark that Lois should be condemned for admiring it on its merits alone. For that would mean Clark should spurn a part of himself when doing so was precisely what caused him so much turmoil as a teenager.
Clark needed to love and accept the special part of himself, and having Lois appreciate that part of himself, without knowing he was Clark, was key to reaching that epiphany because, as Abraham Lincoln famously said, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” In Collateral, for example, a VRA agent wary of heroes observed that Clark had “always been the most reluctant to accept [his] abnormalities” because he was “so afraid to let go of this world that tethers [him] to any sort of normalcy and reality.” Since Lois didn’t focus on validating one side—special or normal—or on sides at all, she was the perfect remedy for his inner turmoil. Her method was, as it always had been, to encourage Clark to trust himself. For instance, after only knowing him a few months in Blank, Lois advised an amnesiac Clark to “trust his gut” and in Collateral she did roughly the same when she got him “to fly” out of a fake reality by reminding him to trust his heart to tell him what was true. What was true—the truth that Lois knew and believed in, and which she ultimately got Clark to trust—was the truth about himself: neither his alien nature nor his human nurture had to be forsaken. He wouldn’t lose himself if he embraced what was special about him because that extraordinary side was just as true a part of him as his ordinary side. Why did Clark believe her? Because Lois had initially cared for and trusted both sides of Clark without knowing they were one in the same; she had proven she had an understanding and belief in him that was complete, genuine, and unmatched.
Even better is how Lois' support doesn't give Clark anything he didn’t already have, for, as the Good Witch says in The Wizard of Oz, the power was in Clark all along; Lois just affirmed it. For instance, in addition to inspiring Clark to embrace his “abnormalities” in Collateral, Lois later reassured Clark in Kent that all that was his life in Smallville would always be right there in his heart—she “would never let” him lose that part of himself. Fast forward to the future shown in Homecoming and Lois states outright that Clark’s got her to remind him that if he was “going to crash land [his] spaceship anywhere, [he] couldn't have chosen better people to find [him] then the Kents.” She even gets Clark to recall Jonathan outside their apartment on their wedding day in the Finale. So whenever Clark’s feeling lost between one of his identities, Lois is able to help him find his way back, not by giving him anything, but by encouraging him to trust himself in order to unlock the power already within him to be the best version of himself--man or Superman--he can be.
Balancing Act
By helping Clark transcend the superficial aspects of his identity (e.g. powers, names, attire) and trust his heart above all else, Lois successfully reinforces the man and encourages the hero. Yet, while in his heart there is no such distinction, in his public life there must be because Superman is for the world and not for just one person. Fortunately, through their private relationship, Lois and Clark can share their whole selves and whole lives together, as the two of them have in each other a place to rest—a home. These two individuals who similarly craved a higher purpose, found in their private relationship the relief from the lonely and onerous life of a hero. With Lois, Clark got to have a normal human life and to receive the encouragement and companionship he once shared with Lois as the Blur through their phone calls. Likewise, with Clark, Lois got to have a real relationship with a man who, unlike the other men of action in her life, would make her feel needed as a true partner and would provide a safe place for her to show her imperfections and vulnerability. And, as illustrated in Booster, the duality of their lives meant Lois and Clark could alternate who was the alpha in the relationship. Accordingly, loving each other and sharing a life together meant finding harmony in all aspects of their lives and their identities.
Ultimately, then, who Lois loved, and will always love, is who Clark also came to embrace: his whole self, undivided, with each part harmoniously existing as simply varied expressions of the same man’s heart. Where before Clark had split himself between Lana (humanity, selfishness, fantasy, and love) and Chloe (weirdness, duty, reality, friendship) for fear of losing himself and what he had with both, with Lois he found the perfect balance. In fact, Allison Mack once commented that, "together, Lana and Chloe make Lois” so in her “you have Clark's perfect woman.” According to Mack, there “was an interesting scene in Dichotic where Chloe and Lana move in together” which uses a shot of the two girls walking into a house after Clark has helped them unpack. Tom reportedly remarked that the moment was “important, because [Clark was] seeing [his] ideal woman in the two [girls], and recognizing that.” Therefore, Clark’s ability to accept and balance the two sides of himself, and his and Lois’ connection through those two valid expressions of himself (Clark and the Blur), were developed concurrently in the narrative in order to communicate that only through this reciprocal process could Clark coalesce into his whole, true self and experience true love.
There is a line in the song played during Lois and Clark’s wedding in the Finale that eloquently sums up how Lois and Clark were written as true loves because of the way they perfectly harmonize. It goes “my secrets become your truth.” Through the Blur, Clark got to share the secret side of himself he’d rejected and feared and Lois got to share the secret side of herself that was stripped of bravado and cynicism which she’d often employed to protect herself from getting her hopes up and getting hurt. It had the romanticism and idealism of Clark’s relationship with Lana and the friendship and duty of his relationship with Chloe. As Clark said in Patriot, he and Lois work because their differences make their “puzzle pieces” fit together perfectly, or as Lois likes to say, they’re “chocolate and peanut butter, yin and yang” (Hostage). The concept of Yin and Yang suits Lois and Clark well because it posits that only when one has found one’s true self, can one truly find the other half of one’s soul or one’s soul mate (source). Furthermore, contrary to what some might believe, Lois and Clark are not a case of opposites attracting, but complements attracting:
Opposites are black and white, completely opposing forces; complements are two sides to the same coin, two forces that flow together more harmoniously than each could were it separate. […] The Taoist yin-yang symbol […] is a representation of complements. Yin and yang circle around one another, each representing different parts of a greater whole, each completing the other to form a perfect whole. Attraction is the recognition of complementary aspects in another person. […] This type of attraction goes on at a deep, subconscious level that some would call the soul. Our soul, some believe, is always deficient in some way and always seeking to complete itself. In a way, it is a yang seeking its yin, or a yin seeking it yang. It’s not an opposite that we yearn for, it’s our other half, the part that will make our soul complete. […] Being in love with someone means that some major parts of you have found their complement in the other person; you feel whole having this connection. There are numerous stories of people rising to greater challenges and achieving higher goals after being in love. This makes perfect sense, of course, as a complete person is incredibly powerful. (Source)
In short, the bond Lois and Clark formed as Lois/Clark and Lois/Blur helped them find their true selves, and with that came the courage to be completely whole and truthful with one another so they could forever challenge each other and encourage each other to be their best selves.
The Truth Shall Set You Free
Essentially, Lois and Clark were drawn together first as two pairs (a triangle-for-two), but there was only ever two hearts being shared. So when Lois finally had one face to go with the singular heart with which she’d connected, it created a perfect union of complements; their many secrets became their one truth. Such truth from true love sets you free from the fear of yourself and others (so free, you can fly) because it reassures you of the solid foundation of who you are, wholly and completely, which is necessary to remain grounded. It’s why in Harvest Clark equated Lois being “the one…always” with her “knowing [him] completely with no secrets” and why immediately afterward they became one flesh to the tune, "I come to tell you all the truth, though you always had the proof of it."
It is thus inaccurate to say Lois only loved the Blur, when she fell in love with Clark first and never stopped loving him, and it is insulting to Clark himself to suggest that Lois shouldn’t be drawn to the Blur when Clark encouraged Lois’ affections for the Blur through his intimate phone calls and when the Blur was an equally valid expression of who Clark was at heart. Furthermore, there is nothing wrong with Lois’ admission in Isis that knowing “the man [she] loved and the hero [she] admired, were the same person” was what made “everything just fit into place” and made her love Clark “even more,” because the bond she shared with the Blur was the result of Clark’s heart shining through his actions and because instead of connecting completely through each fraction of themselves, they could finally connect totally and honestly in a way strengthened them as individuals and as a couple.
Did you know that the comics were forced into marrying Clark & Lois? the 1990s TV show married them without DCs permission and the already printed and drafted issue where they cancel the wedding had to be rewritten. And then the TV show tanked the next season. The writers still debate over it, because Superman wouldn't get divorced but Clark Kent would never marry someone like Lois Lane. If you've done your research you probably already know this though.
Sigh. I have done my research. I know the history of Lois and Clark's marriage quite well, thank you very much. And you know what? So do a lot of other people (other than those who might want to live in denial or ignorance). I recommend reading this excellent post, which includes hard evidence from the historical record, and which proves that you are, beyond a shadow of a doubt, absolutely incorrect to say DC was forced to marry Lois and Clark.