Blatantly Partisan Party Review IX (NSW 2019): Shooters, Fishers, and Farmers Party
Prior reviews: 2013, 2014, 2016, 2018
What I said before: “This is a party of right-wing anti-environmentalism that has found some measure of success in rural NSW … Exactly what it says on the tin. The SFF will water down our successful gun control laws, support environmentally destructive policies, back the mining and logging industries, and be a brake on urgently-needed climate action.”
What I think this year: Perhaps the most interesting quality of the SFF is that they are no longer the reliable ally of the Liberal/National Coalition that they used to be. They have experienced success in winning former Coalition seats, and they have not always co-operated on policy in the Legislative Council.
This is not an endorsement, however. The only limits they would place on mining are when miners and farmers come into conflict, such as we see in the coal seam gas debate—otherwise this is a staunchly pro-coal party who favour new coal power plants and are hostile to practically any serious steps to mitigate climate change. SFF would let the planet burn.
The party name is the clue. Emotive blather about “green bureaucracy gone mad” defines their policies about fishing. It’s not as if it’s hard to go fishing for recreation, but marine parks and catch limits just get these nutters foaming. Their rhetoric veers between recreational and commercial fishing with limited clarity, and anyone who knows anything about marine life knows that the commercial fishing sector is responsible for extreme degradation of oceanic environments within a context of poor regulation and limited enforcement.
Also, I’d take their concern for regional communities a little more seriously if their transport policy were not literally just a roads policy. They describe public transport in regional areas as inadequate—and just leave it there. Instead of backing meaningful improvements in rail and other public infrastructure, SFF are completely in hock to outdated road-centric transport policy rather than the integrated multi-modal approach essential to maximise economic and social gains.
I drafted these comments before the tragic events in Christchurch. I am now all the more sure that it would be grossly irresponsible to let this party remain in parliament. Australia’s gun laws need to be tighter, not looser. SFF are a threat to public safety—not just long-term from climate change, but also in the short-term. Reject their appeals.
Website: https://www.shootersfishersandfarmers.org.au/











