seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Indonesia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
हिमाचल सरकार ने कर्मचारियों के ट्रांसफर नियमों में किया बड़ा बदलाव, कार्मिक विभाग ने जारी किया ऑफिस मेमो Shimla News: हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार के कार्मिक विभाग ने राज्य कर्मचारियों के तबादला नियमों में बड़ा बदलाव किया है। सरकार ने ट्रांसफर से जुड़े कॉम्प्रिहेंसिव गाइडिंग प्रिंसिपल्स-2013 के पैरा 16.1 में संशोधन करते हुए 25 जुलाई 2026 को ऑफिस मेमो जारी किया। इस फैसले से दूरस्थ क्षेत्रों में तैनाती के नियम स्पष्ट होंगे।...
हिमाचल सरकार ने कर्मचारियों के ट्रांसफर नियमों में किया बड़ा बदलाव, कार्मिक विभाग ने जारी किया ऑफिस मेमो Shimla News: हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार के कार्मिक विभाग ने राज्य कर्मचारियों के तबादला नियमों में बड़ा बदलाव किया है। सरकार ने ट्रांसफर से जुड़े कॉम्प्रिहेंसिव गाइडिंग प्रिंसिपल्स-2013 के पैरा 16.1 में संशोधन करते हुए 25 जुलाई 2026 को ऑफिस मेमो जारी किया। इस फैसले से दूरस्थ क्षेत्रों में तैनाती के नियम स्पष्ट होंगे।...
हिमाचल प्रदेश: सरकारी कॉलेजों में स्थानांतरण के दौरान अनुपस्थिति अब अवैतनिक अवकाश मानी जाएगी
Himachal News: हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार ने सरकारी डिग्री और संस्कृत महाविद्यालयों के कर्मचारियों के लिए एक महत्वपूर्ण निर्णय लिया है। स्थानांतरण के दौरान अनुपस्थिति अवधि को अब अवैतनिक अवकाश माना जाएगा। राज्य सरकार ने सितंबर 2014 में जारी किए गए पुराने निर्देशों को वापस ले लिया है। इससे पहले ऐसी अनुपस्थिति को नियमित अवकाश माना जाता था। नई व्यवस्था की मुख्य बातें उच्च शिक्षा निदेशालय ने मंगलवार को सभी…
हिमाचल प्रदेश: सरकारी कॉलेजों में स्थानांतरण के दौरान अनुपस्थिति अब अवैतनिक अवकाश मानी जाएगी
Himachal News: हिमाचल प्रदेश सरकार ने सरकारी डिग्री और संस्कृत महाविद्यालयों के कर्मचारियों के लिए एक महत्वपूर्ण निर्णय लिया है। स्थानांतरण के दौरान अनुपस्थिति अवधि को अब अवैतनिक अवकाश माना जाएगा। राज्य सरकार ने सितंबर 2014 में जारी किए गए पुराने निर्देशों को वापस ले लिया है। इससे पहले ऐसी अनुपस्थिति को नियमित अवकाश माना जाता था। नई व्यवस्था की मुख्य बातें उच्च शिक्षा निदेशालय ने मंगलवार को सभी…
If it’s true that Jana had her contract terminated…what’s your thoughts on why the club would do this? Like yeah it frees up salary but wouldn’t getting a transfer fee also free up salary?
I know I’m not saying anything new with this but I’m actually just so sad about how our club is handling this. And you know it’s bad when all the Barça (mainly men’s focused pages) are highlighting how shit the treatment is. Actually this is probably the only tiny positive that I’m seeing from my perspective, so much outrage and support from culers.
so i previously discussed on my blog why some teams choose to do a contract termination as opposed to trying to sell a player and collect a transfer fee. essentially, it benefits the player more so than the club.
for the player, the inbound club does not have to pay the outbound club a transfer fee (so it's like the player is leaving on a free), and this opens up more clubs for the player to negotiate with and she is not limited to the only ones who are willing to pay the fee.
for the club, the outbound club immediately gets to free up salary space, even though they have to potentially lose out on a transfer fee. when it's a mutual termination, the club also keeps a positive relationship with the outgoing player in the case that they may eventually return to the club. but the club doesn't gain as much as the player (in my opinion!)
what i find difficult to understand is that LCL would be unwilling to pay a transfer fee. that part doesn't make sense. jana is a fantastic young player with a high potential.
that is why i am questioning this news. so far it's only been one source about no transfer fee for jana. maybe let's wait and see what else develops.
So now that Chloe Kelly is in Arsenal and Laura Weinroither is at Man City, and Keira Walsh maybe in Chelsea, will they be able to play in UWCL because they played for the old clubs in group stages?
yup they are all eligible to play. remember that uwcl got rid of cup tied rules and there are so many exceptions that as long as they are part of the official 25 player registration list they are good to go.
i previously talked about the rules governing that in this post.
it's all about perspective. if you think there's silence about ingrid, then what about irene? don't forget there were rumours around her leaving too.
and there was more keira news because of the deadline to finish by yesterday. there's still time left for ingrid.
there's nothing wrong with having a favourite player on a team. but we should also be realistic about our favourite players.
like i was not upset that alexia did not start in the champions league final or in the big matches last year. i understood her role on the team last year. i think there's a difference in having a favourite player but taking things too far if you perceive your favourite player is not getting what they deserve. 🤷♀️
but either way, there is no reason to hate an ANY player. and certainly no reason to pit any two or three players against each other.
agreed, i think the keira situation was handled quite poorly by the club, from a personal, sporting, and business perspective.
