Transit Explained: The Downside of Dedicated Bus Lanes
Recently, the SFMTA released the final version of the Mission Street Muni improvement plan, without a northbound only one deidcated lane in the southbound direction. Earlier drafts had included lanes in both directions and 2/3 of survey respondants supported a Northbound transit lane as well. As the SFMTA explains it though, a dedicated lane in this case would end up doing more harm than good.
At intersections, right turning traffic would be mix with it, meaning the bus would not have it’s own lane where it matters most. Right turning traffic is delayed more than traffic going through.
It's pretty easy to see on a map how traffic turning and busses moving forward would get jammed up, while the center lane would be comparitively free for forward moving car traffic to bypass Muni.
The SFMTA does intend to add a limited amount of transit lane pockets at specific intersections which currently cause problems.
Transit lanes are only needed where there are queues or congestion blocking a bus’ path. Therefore it is important for a bus to have its own lane at intersections, and a transit-only lane is less important to have midblock.
Most importantly, transit lanes are only proposed in locations where they would have an effect, following a detailed analysis of every intersection.
At 16th & Mission is one of the special cases, with a short, dedicated lane just before the intersection. That will allow Muni busses bypass car traffic, which will be forced to make a right turn and clear the way for busses pulling up to the North-East BART plaza.
Periodically nudging motorits onto neighboring side streets with forced right turns has also demonstrated on Market Street (where cars are forced to turn at Tenth and Sixth) to distribute traffic more evenly before it reaches frequent pinch-points downtown and near freeway onramps.
Got a question about Muni or how transit works? Ask Muniverse, we might have an answer.