am i allowed to ask for context on transfem jonathan harker. because i love the vision and am currently reading dracula but i want to know like your reasonings as you are the wisest draculablogger i know
basically the whole Thing for the beginning chunk of the book where jonathan's stuck in draculaland is that he's taking on the typical role of gothic heroine, i.e. getting locked away in a crumbling castle by a weird old guy with an implicit looming sexual threat, and the text directly compares him to two well known female characters, lenore from the ballad "lenore" and scheherazade from the arabian nights. often the way this gets read is that part of the horror is supposed to come from jonathan's emasculation and the subversion of gender norms, and while that's not not true, it also overlooks that he compares himself to women a few times in an effort to self-soothe in a kind of "it makes me feel better to remember that my situation is kindred to these other situations" way, or, as I like to think of it, "god I'm miserable but at least I can imagine I'm a miserable girl. yeah phew that's better." later, when he gets back to london, mina mentions that it's an old preference of his to take on the feminine social role in courtship rituals (him holding her arm when they go out walking instead of the other way around), which she as an etiquette teacher is hyper aware of as "improper" but can't bring herself to actually mind.
(spoilers for the last like third of the book)
there's also the really interesting contrast where, on the one hand, jonathan is finally catalyzed into getting back on his active heroic masculinity game when his innocent wife is attacked and violated by an orientalized Other, an image that reinforces all kinds of conservative ideals about gender and sexuality and race and nation and so forth, but on the other hand he then swears to himself that if it gets down to it he will straight up turn gender / religion / nation traitor and reject everything he's been raised to value in favor of staying loyal to his wife and literally giving his body to her. he begins performing masculinity like a motherfucker but in a way that the other men ("the other men") in the story find unnerving, dangerous, and untrustworthy. previously in the text, jonathan makes a distinction between men and women vs vampires who look like men and women, and I feel like late-novel jonathan is all masculinity with no manhood. and yes that entendre is doubling.
basically I think jonathan harker is a lightly butchy transfem in a "had to completely drop her assigned gender role and then cautiously re-approach it from the other side to pick out the parts she actually likes" kind of way.








