Noma Dumezweni and David Dastmalchian in Season One of Apple TV's Murderbot (2025)
we're not kids anymore.

No title available
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
taylor price
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Today's Document
i don't do bad sauce passes
d e v o n
Cosmic Funnies
$LAYYYTER

★
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Love Begins
One Nice Bug Per Day

No title available
AnasAbdin

shark vs the universe

Product Placement
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Claire Keane

seen from South Korea

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Thailand
seen from Germany
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from T1
seen from Mexico

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
@annabelle--cane
Noma Dumezweni and David Dastmalchian in Season One of Apple TV's Murderbot (2025)
Never been about me
spider
i love absorbing iwtv content exclusively from the dash because you could tell me literally ANYTHING was going on in that show and i'd be like that tracks with what i've seen. they're all actors in a play together. they had a lesbian daughter but there were custody issues and i think she died in a plane crash or something it's really tragic. one of them isn't even real he's just a long-term hallucination the other one has been having. they opened up their marriage to include a third guy who's hot and even more evil. the two guys and their third are all sleeping with a journalist who used to be young and is now old. after they got divorced one of them decided to reinvent himself as iggy pop and i think that's a perfectly fine way to cope.
I'm god's specialest princess I've never been wrong I cannot be harmed by word nor action and I shall never die
favorite word?
paroxysm
brb trying this
Shout out to one of the funniest sports graphics I've ever seen
no mom i’m not high my eyes are red because i’m evil
When you feel yourself straining too hard about this remember that the author literally said that he never puts politics in his writing
that's not even my problem rn, my issue is not with the novel or movie's texts but with The Entire Academic Field Of Sexual Psychology
what if you wanted to [write a vaguely formal and fully cited mini research paper on gender and sexuality in project hail mary for funsies] but [there was an extremely glaring Gap In The Scholarship on the exact subject that you're actually trying to write about in literally every book and journal you check]
the one time. The One Time I encounter a field of research where the assumption is "well yes this does apply to everyone but we're all studying women as the default." is also the one time I'm explicitly looking for research on men. do you know how insane I feel to now be the "well what about men" person? searching ctrl + f + "men" in every article and getting pure sweet fuck all? sitting here saying "has anyone ever thought about the plight of those poor poor men who want to have sex with women? ...no?" come onnnnnn
what if you wanted to [write a vaguely formal and fully cited mini research paper on gender and sexuality in project hail mary for funsies] but [there was an extremely glaring Gap In The Scholarship on the exact subject that you're actually trying to write about in literally every book and journal you check]
I always assume the train will be so boring and I bring seven things to do but then I'm entranced by the wonderful window the entire time
rule 1 of arguing is to never actually present the case in favour of your point. it shows weakness in your position that you feel the need to prove it. instead simply repeatedly assert it to be true and self-evident. rule 2 is to use mockery tactics at every opportunity. the more personal attacks to better. rule 3 is to always argue in a pack. this will indicate to your opponent that your point must clearly be convincing to other people, so there must be something to it. make repeated references to the fact that more people agree with you whenever you can. if you follow all three rules in the end you should have convinced exactly 0 people, but that's fine because if they didn't already agree with you they clearly had a moral deficiency anyway and were never even reachable in the first place
okay, i’m curious. let’s play a game. reblog this post and put in the tags the name of a fictional Indigenous character.
No headcanons, no ‘coding’, only CANONICALLY Indigenous characters. You have unlimited time. Go.
arts degrees r so funny because you go in class and theyre like What Is A Poem? we dont know for sure... and then moral of the story is we don't know what a poem is. and then the worst part of it is that theyre right