#tt.

[7weaslesinacoat]

ever reading a comic w damian and you just see the “tt.”

it’s so iconic, like he’s been doing since the very beginning and literally every time i see it i fangirl.

[mumbocumbo]

I totally don't recognize your art style at all 👀 (I ain't no snitch lol don't worry)

But uhh, if you are per chance taking requests, could you spare some rancher crumbs?

well, since you asked so nicely. ;0

ranchers wall sex. c:

link.

[cleocazo]

evening, tags. i’m not trying to expose anyone or anything, BUT it has come to my attention that the group ( paxamericanarp ) is ... quite insensitive and tone deaf, given the current time. i’m including points from an admins character, and like i said : i’m not exposing, but i am putting this out there because in general it feels wildly uncomfortable and over the LINE of problematic. . here’s a link to the bio, even, so you’re aware : this isn’t being taken out of context.

Make Murica Great Again™️

Anti-socialism, Pro-life, Pro-Second-Amendment, Pro-Citizens-United, Pro-universal-healthcare, Pro-capital-punishment, supports the War on Drugs

Against illegal immigration, would significantly improve border control, but advocates a friendlier approach to legal immigrants

Endorsed by the National Rifle Association, with an A rating for her support of pro-gun legislation

To many, the face of Weaponized White Feminism. However, when asked if she herself identifies as a feminist, Sarah Jane says that no, but if it was the year 1900, she would most certainly be a proud and active one. She just can’t relate to the modern-day feminist ideologies the same way, and doesn’t believe men and women are equal: they should have equal rights and opportunities —as all Americans should—but she celebrates their differences and believes they can’t exist separately.

[vax-ildagger]

oh yeah, i can do both

happy thot thursday sluts

[lightfulls]

𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚢𝚘𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖     the ocean lulls a steady lullaby of waves and as she wiggles her toes she feels the grit of sand between her toes.    𝓉𝓊𝒸𝓀𝑒𝒹 𝒶𝓌𝒶𝓎       on their own little island:    𝕙𝕖𝕣 & 𝕣𝕚𝕠.   the hammock they share     sways      with the hot wind that seems to cater to them    alone.   

𝐭𝐨𝐤𝐲𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐬        if her dates match up they’ve been here a year now.   and its likesome kind of       𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘦.     the caribbean life suits ᴛʜᴇᴍ.      days blend steadily into weeks as she gazes up at the bright sun and where it sits between the trees lets her know they have a few more hours of daylight.      turning on her side she places her cheek on his chest,    the cool metal of the medallion on her choker resting against his sun kissed       𝑠𝑘𝑖𝑛.    her questions are asked softly, tilting her face up to look at him.   “ do you think about them? where they are? what they’re doing? in this very moment ..... ”  she refers to their family.  denver, nairobi, helsinki, the professor ......   tokyos mind ever so 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚞𝚜.   wandering as wild as the ocean itself.     @raindrcpsfell​ 

[opvstartercalls]

THIS IS A PERMANENT STARTER CALL FOR TED TONKS !!! please like or reblog if you would not mind me setting you up with random starters / memes / etc. you know the drill. mutuals and non - mutuals welcome but please read rules / exclusives , thank you !!! if you are a multi and only want it for only select muses , feel free to comment below !

please note , all starter calls are found on a sideblog , but you do not need to follow the sideblog , only like the starter call. i just put them there for convenience

[cleocazo]

*   anonymous asked   :   Just curious why you don’t agree with aging face claims down? 

this can only be coming from my second ‘unpopular opinion’, and i’m gonna try my best to word this as well as i can - you don’t have to agree with me ( and maybe people won’t ), but i have strong feelings about it and hope even if you don’t, you’ll still respect my opinion ! 

mostly, my issue is what i’ve already outlined : if you’re going to age an older ( 40+ / 50+ / 60+ / whatever ) face claim down, then why are you playing them in the first place? there are, by now, HUNDREDS of face claims in the roleplay community to choose from, at all sorts of ages - if you wanted to play a twenty one year old, you have a plethora of options for that character who would WORK within an age rule ( i’m a fan of -5 / +5, but i know some people use different ones ) without taking madchen amick and using her twin peaks resources. there’s no REASON for you to use her for a younger character, when you have so many other options you could - and i don’t think that you’re making a statement by choosing her over them.

mostly, it feels counterproductive. older characters aren’t actually played very commonly in groups. that’s fine, because a lot of people just don’t feel comfortable and that’s understandable - but they aren’t. by taking a face claim who is, say, fifty, and by playing them as a twenty year old... you aren’t actually doing anything for your group. you aren’t making a change to the balance of younger vs older characters. you’re not even adhering to any of the now popular age rules. 

to me, it feels like it’s saying something ( and i’m not saying this is INTENTIONAL, but it’s how it looks ) to play an older face claim as such a younger character : you only want to use that face when they are at their youngest and thus, their most desireable. they’re only good for you when they’re younger than their current age. you only want to use them when they aren’t older. this is the message it sends, and my next point will probably explain why it sends that, to me -

what age do you have to reach, then, to be considered fine to age down again ? the rpc has gotten REALLY good in more recent years in playing face claims at an age appropriate to their real life one. if you played a 35 year old as a nineteen year old, now, you’d probably face a lot of backlash. so why is it perceived as totally fine to play a face claim who’s 40 / 50 / 60+, and age them down to being almost a child again ? why is it that once they’re past a certain point, the rpc feels like it’s okay ? it’s WHY it makes it impossible not to think my previous point - when you have a whole HOST of other options but you choose one who you have to age down by halve, maybe even triple their current age, you are not sending as good a message as you want to be sending. you just aren’t ! 

at the end of the day : definitely continue to play who you WANT to play. older characters, younger characters, older faces, younger faces. but think, critically, about your choices regarding that. why are you choosing a face claim who is, let’s say, forty nine years old to play your TWENTY ONE year old white girl when you could choose any number of the rpcs white girls of the month to play them instead, and leave that face claim ( who in madchen amick’s case specifically has ABSOLUTELY got more resources as a fully grown woman than she does a child ) for someone who will play them at an appropriate age. because there are already so few faces with resources to be played as older characters. they are already so few and far between in groups. that you TAKING an older face and just aging them down feels like a slap in the face to what you COULD have done, and i, personally, don’t agree with it.