seen from Norway
seen from Brunei
seen from China
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Indonesia
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Belgium
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
Capture design feedback quickly and easily with our online usability tests.
Hellooo, I had to create this quiz for my class and I would really appreciate it if you could take a minute (literally) of your time to take the quiz! I just need as much feedback as possible, as this project will eventually be in my portfolio. Thank you in advance!
The User is Not a Designer
As freelance graphic and web designer, I quickly learned that my clients were not designers. After all, that's what they were paying me for. As difficult as I sometimes found it to decide amongst subtly different logo variations I'd created, I knew that throwing them all at my client and asking "which one do you prefer" wouldn't turn out well for anyone.
The same applies even more strongly user interface design. The role of the designer is NOT to mock up 3 different layouts and then ask someone else, be it her boss, the CMO, or her end users, which one they "prefer." It's just...irrelevant. Now the good news is, unlike with a logo, there are ways to put a UI design to the test.
What not to do
I have been using usabilityhub.com a lot recently, experimenting with click tests and five-second tests. You can earn responses to your tests by taking others' tests (awesome), and I always find it interesting to see what other people are testing. I have noticed that a lot of people create click tests containing multiple variations of a design in a single image. The instructions are usually something along the lines of "click the one you prefer".
Instead, see which actually performs better
A better approach would be to focus on one function the design has to serve or piece of information it has to convey, and set up a test with each design as a separate variation. (Luckily, UsabilityHub has this functionality built in quite brilliantly).
For example, in a list of products, users have to be able to add the quantity they want to the cart. So you could set up a click test with multiple variations, and ask testers where they would click to add 2 widgets to the cart. After the results are in, you can compare them side-by-side to see where people clicked, and which was most successful.
Exceptions to the rule
There are certainly contexts where "preference" is valid. As Jakob Nielsen points out, if users have had a chance to really try out two different interfaces, and thus truly know which one works better for them, their preference is important. More specific questions than "Which do you like better?" could also provide good feedback, such as "Which logo says 'eco-friendly'?"
But, to paraphrase George Bush: "I'm the designer, and I decide what's best (based on careful observation and study of user behavior, as well as years of experience and schooling. Also, I'm willing to change my mind based on evidence. That is all.)"
Related reading
First Rule of Usability? Don't Listen to Users
Three Questions You Shouldn't Ask During User Research
The Homer
UsabilityHub's Five-Second Split Tests
I recently discovered that UsabilityHub allows you to test multiple variations of a page in a single 5-second test. After I set one up (please take the test if you like), I sent them some feedback about being able to share a single url, and have users see one of the variations at random. Not two days later, I got this email in reply:
This feature is now live. Next time you're running variations of a test, you'll find that there's a link to share that will divide your participants as evenly as possible between the variations (image below). You can still link to each test individually too, but users will only be able to complete one variation. Would love to hear your thoughts!
Well, my thoughts are: "Kick ass!". Not only is this feature useful and nicely implemented, the responsiveness of UsabilityHub, and more generally the modern web app development environment is incredible.
So, try it out. Take my test, or create your own.
You may be surprised at what you discover. I found that my pages are utterly failing to communicate much of anything in 5 seconds, but that's for another post.
