seen from China
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Algeria
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
Thinking About Moving Into Security? Here’s What You Need to Know
Are you planning to transition into the security domain? This applies whether you are a scrum master, program manager, developer, tester, cloud administrator, or database administrator. The good news is that moving into security doesn’t have to be a complex leap. The security field offers a wide range of options. Your existing skills already make you a natural fit for certain areas. Compliance,…
Athletes & vulnerability
Sally Jenkins talks about how vulnerability, and an athlete's ability to properly deal with it, makes them a healthy person under pressure.
Listen to our full conversation
And be sure to check out Sally's new book, "The Right Call: What Sports Teach Us About Work and Life."
Vulnerability Management: vom CVE-Report zur Priorisierung
Ein Schwachstellen-Scanner findet hunderte CVEs in einer durchschnittlichen Codebasis. Die meisten Teams kippen diese Liste in ein Ticket-System und arbeiten sie von oben nach unten ab. Das ist der falsche Weg. Vulnerability Management beginnt nicht mit dem Scan, sondern mit der Frage, welche der gefundenen Schwachstellen in eurem konkreten System überhaupt ausnutzbar sind. Warum die CVSS-Zahl…
How AutoSecT Handles False Positive Reduction at Scale
AutoSecT by Kratikal is an AI-driven pentest and VMDR platform that is being built and improved habitually to detect and inform you about the flaws in your asset inventory, like cloud, web apps, mobile apps, API endpoints, and network. It excels in AI-driven real-time vulnerability analysis, real-time validation of security threats using intelligent automation, prioritizing and managing vulnerability mitigation lifecycle based on risks – critical, high, medium, low. As a part of VMaaS, AutoSecT lists out the vulnerabilities after AI-verification, ensuring false positive reduction along with AI-driven recommendations for each vulnerability, making it easier and more efficient for teams responsible for patching the loopholes.
AutoSecT lists out the vulnerabilities after AI-verification, ensuring false positive reduction along with AI-driven recommendations.
Five Retail Security Myths, Tested: What Threat Intelligence Services Reveal About Retail Under Siege
In 2025 ran the experiment for us. Here is what the breach data says about five beliefs retail teams repeat every year.
Retail security runs on a handful of beliefs that get repeated until they feel like facts. 2025 tested every one of them, at scale, in public.
This post takes five of those beliefs and checks each against the year’s breach data. Spoiler: retail under siege is a measurable condition, and threat intelligence services explain more of 2025 than any single retail technology solution on the market. If you run technology for a store, five people or five thousand, this is for you.
Why Do People Still Call Retail a Boring Target?
Because retail attacks rarely look dramatic from outside. From inside, 2025 looked like a national retailer tracking fresh food with pen and paper.
That was Marks & Spencer in April 2025, after attackers shut down its automated ordering and stock systems across more than 1,400 stores. The suspects arrested for the wider campaign were aged 17 to 20. This was never a state operation. It was a small group with phone scripts and patience.
The “boring” belief survives because roughly one attack in twenty targets retail, a smaller share than finance or healthcare receives. The same tracking shows that most retailers still get hit, because one in twenty of a very large number remains a constant stream of attempts.
What Can Threat Intelligence Services See That Your Firewall Cannot?
Intent. A firewall inspects traffic that already arrived. Threat intelligence services watch the places where attacks get planned, bought, and sold.
The difference is practical. Flashpoint tracked 37,691 new vulnerabilities in a single year, over a third with public exploit code. No perimeter tool tells you which of those criminals actually use against retail. Intelligence does, along with which of your employees’ logins sit for sale on criminal forums and which fake copies of your storefront went live this week.
Your firewall still matters. It answers a different question. “Block this packet” and “expect this campaign” are separate jobs, and 2025 punished companies that funded only the first. Pairing intelligence feeds with AI-driven automation handles the volume side, since nobody reads ten thousand alerts by hand.
Why Does “Patch the Highest Score First” Fail as Vulnerability Management?
Because severity measures possible damage, while attackers choose targets by ease and payoff.
One number makes the case. Organizations fully remediated only 54% of their vulnerable edge devices within the year, even as exploitation of exactly those devices kept growing as an entry route. Endless scored lists produce slow, unfocused work.
Vulnerability management improves the moment queue order comes from evidence. CISA’s free Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list names the flaws criminals use in real intrusions. Sort by that first, then by which assets face the internet, then by score. Teams that switch usually find the true emergency list holds a few dozen items, and a few dozen is a list you can finish.
How Do Small Retailers Face the Same Criminals as the Giants?
With focus and free sources, because opting out is not available.
Criminal pricing keeps climbing. Ransom demands above $5 million grew from 17% to 27% of retail cases, while the median payment barely moved, which means more retailers now refuse the inflated number. Refusal takes preparation, and the cost of arriving unprepared shows in jobs: 12% of attacked retailers laid off staff because of the financial damage.
A small team holds real advantages: a short asset list, fast decisions, and no committee between “we should require call-back verification” and “we now do.” Add one free advisory subscription and one credential watchlist, and a five-person shop runs a leaner version of the same routine the giants run.
What Can You Fix Before Friday?
Four things, none of which require budget approval:
Turn on call-back verification for every password or MFA reset your help desk performs.
Subscribe to one advisory source, your national CERT or CISA, and forward it to the team channel.
List every internet-facing system you own, including the promo microsite from two seasons ago.
Pick your ten most exposed, actively exploited flaws and schedule the fixes like real work.
None of this is glamorous. All of it separates the quiet years from the expensive ones.
What Is the One Idea Worth Reblogging?
Attackers run on information, so defense runs on better information. That is the whole field in one sentence. Threat intelligence services supply the information, vulnerability management acts on it, and together they behave like any other retail technology solution: budgeted, measured, and owned.
When you want the long version mapped onto an actual commerce stack, ViitorCloud’s team wrote a retail-focused threat intelligence breakdown that goes deeper than a single post can.
Threat intelligence services give retailers continuous visibility into attacks on payment and customer data. Cut risk before peak traffic hi
Threat intelligence services give retailers continuous visibility into attacks on payment and customer data. Cut risk before peak traffic hits.
The Silent Security Debt: Why Patching Isn't Enough Anymore
Imagine spending weeks building an airtight security perimeter, only to realize the back door was left unlocked because of a minor, overlooked software flaw. It happens constantly. In fact, thousands of new security vulnerabilities are discovered every single year, leaving security teams in a perpetual game of whack-a-mole. If your team is solely reacting to the latest emergency patch, you are already playing a losing game.
True security requires moving away from reactive firefighting. To stay ahead of modern threats, organizations must shift toward a proactive, continuous strategy that focuses on identifying, prioritizing, and mitigating risks before an attacker exploits them.
The Core Elements of Modern Vulnerability Management
Managing security flaws is not a one-time project or a monthly checklist item. It is an ongoing cycle that requires a structured approach to keep your digital assets safe.
A standard framework relies on several continuous phases:
Asset Discovery: You cannot protect what you do not know exists. This phase involves scanning your entire infrastructure to build an accurate inventory of hardware, software, and cloud resources.
Vulnerability Scanning: Utilizing automated tools to probe your systems for known weaknesses, misconfigurations, or outdated software versions.
Risk Assessment: Analyzing the discovered flaws to determine their severity and potential impact on your specific business operations.
Prioritization: Sorting the findings so your team tackles the most critical, exploitable risks first, rather than getting overwhelmed by a massive list of low-level alerts.
Remediation: Fixing the issues through patching, updating configurations, or implementing compensating controls.
While this lifecycle sounds straightforward, execution is where many security teams stumble. If you want to understand the deep mechanics behind building these defenses from scratch, exploring a comprehensive breakdown of vulnerability management in cybersecurity will give you the foundational blueprint needed to align your team.
Moving Beyond CVSS Scores: Smart Prioritization
One of the biggest traps security teams fall into is relying strictly on Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) scores. A CVSS score tells you how severe a vulnerability is in a vacuum, but it does not tell you the real-world risk to your specific organization.
Consider these two scenarios:
A vulnerability with a CVSS score of 9.8 exists on an isolated legacy server with no internet access and no sensitive data.
A vulnerability with a CVSS score of 7.5 exists on your primary public-facing web server that handles customer transactions.
Which one deserves immediate attention? The second one, hands down.
Actionable Strategies for Real-World Risk Reduction
To optimize your remediation workflow, stop treating every critical alert as an equal emergency. Use these three insider strategies to streamline your efforts:
Map Threats to Business Context: Cross-reference your scan results with your asset inventory. Prioritize flaws found on systems that house critical intellectual property, customer data, or financial records.
Track Active Exploitation: Monitor threat intelligence feeds. If a vulnerability has a known, active exploit being used in the wild by threat actors, it jumps to the front of the queue, regardless of its baseline score.
Implement Compensating Controls: If a patch cannot be applied immediately because it might break a legacy production system, do not just leave it exposed. Restrict network access, segment the asset, or write custom detection rules in your security monitoring tools to blunt the risk until a permanent fix is possible.
Building a Culture of Shared Responsibility
At the end of the day, security tools are only as effective as the processes and people behind them. The most successful security strategies break down the traditional walls between security analysts and IT operations.
When your security team understands infrastructure constraints, and your operations team understands the business impact of an unpatched flaw, remediation happens faster, smoother, and with significantly less friction.
Connect With Us: [email protected]
Pentesting vs VMDR: What’s the Difference and Why You Need Both
Cyber threats are always dynamic and businesses can hardly afford to stick to one method of security. Attackers are always in search of vulnerabilities, misconfigurations and weak security controls.
Organizations have been compelled to integrate various cybersecurity strategies in order to remain secure. Penetration testing (Pentesting) and Vulnerability Management, Detection, and Response ( VMDR ) are two methods that are used six.
Though they are concerned with enhancing security, they are used in varying circumstances. Knowing their differences and how they combine to provide a more effective defense strategy assists businesses in developing a more robust defense strategy. This article discusses the major distinctions and the reasons behind why pentest and VMDR platform will produce superior security results.
Understanding Penetration Testing (Pentesting)
Penetration testing is a simulated cyberattack that is performed by security professionals to determine exploitable weaknesses in systems, applications or networks. The aim is to reason like an attacker and identify how the vulnerabilities may be exploited to access unauthorized access.
Pentesting is more realistic in the case of actual attack situations as opposed to automated scanning. White hat hackers seek to bypass the safeguards, take advantage of security weaknesses and prove the potential business consequences.
Key Objectives of Pentesting
Identify exploitable vulnerabilities
Test existing security controls
Simulate attacker behavior
Evaluate response readiness
Provide remediation guidance
Pentesting is usually conducted periodically, such as annually or after major infrastructure changes.
Understanding VMDR (Vulnerability Management, Detection, and Response)
VMDR is an ongoing security program that recognizes, allocates, and assists in eliminating vulnerabilities within the setting of an organization. VMDR is run on a continuous basis to identify new risks as they arise instead of periodic testing.
A VMDR system will scan the systems, assess risk levels, and give continuous insight into areas of security risk. This will help in mitigating vulnerabilities before they are used.
Core Functions of VMDR
Continuous vulnerability scanning
Asset discovery and monitoring
Risk-based prioritization
Remediation guidance
Ongoing security visibility
A modern pentest and VMDR platform combines continuous monitoring with real-world validation to strengthen overall security.
Pentesting vs VMDR: Key Differences
While both approaches enhance cybersecurity, they differ in methodology and outcomes.
Approach
Pentesting is concerned with exploitation. Security experts will work hard to hack systems to show actual attack paths.
VMDR is concentrated on the identification and management, performing a constant scanning of vulnerabilities.
Frequency
Pentesting offers a snapshot analysis. VMDR is on-demand and real-time risk visibility.
Depth vs Coverage
Pentesting provides in-depth examination of the chosen systems or applications. VMDR is expansive in terms of all assets.
Output
Pentesting presents a detailed report of vulnerabilities that can be used. VMDR causes continuous vulnerability information and prioritization understanding. Because each addresses different security needs, many organizations adopt a pentest and VMDR platform to eliminate security gaps.
Why Pentesting Alone Is Not Enough
There is a myth that a pentest is undertaken once a year, and provides on-demand protection throughout the year. As a matter of fact, new vulnerabilities are highlighted on a regular basis as a result of updates, configuration or new threats that are discovered.
A pentest represents the current level of security at the moment of performing it. New risks can take months to be noticed without constant monitoring. VMDR meets this gap by establishing vulnerabilities between testing cycles.
Using a pentest and VMDR platform ensures vulnerabilities are continuously discovered and periodically validated through real attack simulations.
Why VMDR Alone Is Not Enough
VMDR offers constant visibility without necessarily displaying how vulnerabilities can be integrated in real attacks. Thousands of problems can be detected by automated scans, and it is hard to prioritize.
Pentesting assists in confirming that only high-risk and exploitable vulnerabilities are real. This helps security teams to spend their time on matters that may actually result in breaches and not all the vulnerabilities that have been detected. A combined pentest and VMDR platform helps reduce false positives and improves remediation efficiency.
How Pentesting and VMDR Work Together
Pentesting and VMDR are more effective security models when combined.
Continuous Discovery with Validation
The vulnerabilities are always identified by VMDR, and pentesting is used to determine the exploitability.
Better Prioritization
Pentesting assists in identifying which vulnerabilities are actually of business risk to enhance VMDR prioritization.
Improved Visibility
VMDR provides ongoing monitoring, and pentesting adds context through attacker-focused testing.
Faster Remediation
Combining both reduces the time between vulnerability discovery and resolution.
Organizations implementing a pentest and VMDR platform benefit from both proactive monitoring and realistic testing.
Business Benefits of Using Both
Stronger understanding of security risks
Improved compliance readiness
Reduced attack surface
Better use of security resources
By integrating both approaches, businesses align technical security efforts with real business risk.
Conclusion
Pentesting and VMDR are not defensive and offensive cybersecurity activities. Pentesting shows the way attackers are taking advantage of vulnerabilities whereas VMDR keeps the vulnerabilities identified and controlled. One gives depth and the other gives continuity.
Companies that do not adopt more than one strategy run the risk of having loophole insecurity. Pentest and VMDR platform is a combination that provides continuous assessment, realistic validation, and quicker remediation. The current threat environment is highly dynamic, and a dual strategy is crucial to achieving a robust security posture.
