Hello, we're Martin & Sarah. We're busy professionals and parents and can't really keep up on pop culture, but we ARE taste-makers. As long as one of us has seen something, we feel pretty confident that we can write an excellent review. Here's our review of Downton Abbey.
Sarah: I've never actually seen the show. I've seen lots of vague facebook statuses about it, once listened to an NPR interview about how linguistically the script is NOT historically accurate, and saw a Slate headline for an article comparing Mad Men characters to Downton Abbey characters. (I did not click the link to learn more). I didn't even do any Internet research for this piece.
So, yes. My opinion is ridiculously uninformed. But, I still have a right to my opinion, right? RIGHT.
Look, I love this show. LOVE IT. It's true that I love any period costume drama, and would probably even love Two and a Half Men if they dressed in period costumes. But it's more than that. It's British! It's set in Victorian England! It's a little bit Jane Austen, a little bit PBS reality TV show Manor house, and a little bit lusty romance novel. What's not to love?
This series is basically a re-telling of Upstairs, Downstairs, the classic British drama about nobles and the servants who work for them, which I’ve also never seen. I think I have seen an episode of Fawlty Towers, which I think is a comedy about servants starring John Cleese. Anyway, it's awesome seeing all the ways that the two classes clash - and how their perspectives are actually growing closer as we march on to modernity. Maggie Smith (aka McGonagal from Harry Potter) is in it! I'm pretty sure she plays a hard-nosed dowager who isn't willing to change with the times. (But has some intense love affair going on behind on the scenes).
The best part, though, is the love triangle! There IS a love triangle, right? There's got to be. I am on Team Nice Guy/Underdog, obviously. Oh! He is such a heartthrob. Let me guess: The spunky ingenue, Elizabeth, grew up with the steward’s son, Oliver, who’s so nice and sweet and smitten with her. But she recently met Giuseppe, the dangerous, rich, Italian-born friend of her cousin, and she’s falling for him.
Did I get it right, Martin?
Martin: I’m proud to say that I’ve watched each and every minute of Downton Abbey and, Sarah, your ridiculously uninformed opinion is not wrong. In fact, while each and every detail is completely inaccurate, the larger picture you paint is good; it’s like you stood in front of a canvas, closed your eyes, and randomly flailed your brush, but the painting you ended up with was actually modernist and pretty compelling.
The show is actually set just before (and, later, during) WWI (that was the war with the trenches, right?). Victorian England was like 1800 or something. I also refuse to do any internet research on this. So let’s say that Victorian England was from 1750--1850 and World War 1 was from like the beginning of 1910 to maybe the end of 1910? That means this show takes place from 1909--1911 (so far). Since the war begins and ends in the span of a single season, it certainly feels like it starts during a garden party in March and is over by Christmas (just in time for a Very Special Episode). But nice try, Sarah.
Anyway, there are definitely a lot of costumes and underdogs and servants and backstabbing and love and lust in Downton Abbey. It’s soapy, sudsy, sumptuously shot, and sensational to look at. The second season, however, really catapulted the show into Days-of-our-Lives-levels of subtlety and Candyland-levels of nuance, but it was still pretty watchable and addictive.
Actually, Sarah, the thing that you got, startlingly, MOST/LEAST/SORT OF correct about Downton Abbey is Maggie Smith’s torrid behind-the-scenes love-affair: in fact, the show is mostly just a soft-core porn starring Dame Maggie Smith. Take it from me -- I’ve seen it all!