So we all know that the complaints about the Senate representation aren't all that legit, because 1) legislation has to pass both the House and the Senate, making it the intersection of federal-member-approved policy and popularly-approved policy, which is essential to the United States as a federation and not a de facto unitary state, and 2) they won't just split up California, which is probably the only way to fix the governance there at this point anyway.
But this actually raises an interesting prospect for global governance.
Suppose left-wingers or liberals ever actually achieve global government. Would it be a federation with a high degree of regional autonomy, which could be used for people to self-sort based on policy preferences or economies of scale for cultural goods, free to live multiple different ways of life... or would it be a unitary state that attempts to apply the same policies everywhere, and overrides local control?
We can't know for certain unless it somehow comes to pass.
The complaints about the Senate suggest that the sentiment is there for a unitary state, and the general flow of power has been towards the central government, which also suggests as much.
