#youngkin

[mudwerks]

(via Youngkin Admin Admits It Removed Thousands Of Legal Voters From Rolls On Accident)

hey that’s one way to win elections... 

if you can’t actually get people to vote for you.

fucking scumbags

[pharosproject]

Democrats play the race card blame game...yet again.

[sarcasticcynic]

Judge rules against Virginia governor’s opt-out school mask order

The judge found that the single issue before the court was whether Glenn Youngkin, through his emergency powers, can override the decision o

Last year, the Virginia legislature passed a law requiring schools to go back to offering in-person learning to all students, effective July 1, 2021. The law expressly requires school boards to provide in-person instruction in a way that "adheres, to the maximum extent practicable, to any currently applicable mitigation strategies ... to reduce the transmission of COVID-19 that have been provided by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

(The CDC recommends "recommends universal indoor masking by all students (ages 2 years and older), staff, teachers, and visitors to K-12 schools, regardless of vaccination status.")

The Virginia Department of Health (VDH) issued a temporary Public Health Order, also effective July 1, 2021, requiring both students and staff to wear a mask while indoors at school (with limited exceptions such as medical condition). When that order expired on July 26, the VDH issued guidance "strongly recommend[ing]" masks, but leaving it up to individual school divisions to implement local mask policies. Numerous school divisions throughout Virginia continued to mandate face masks (still with limited exceptions), in accordance with the CDC recommendations.

On January 15, 2022, Republican Glenn Youngkin was sworn in as Virginia's new governor. The very next day, Saturday, January 16, Youngkin issued an "emergency" executive order purporting to end all mask mandates in schools statewide as of January 24. Youngkin ordered all schools to allow parents to "opt out" of mask-wearing, without requiring the parents "to provide a reason or make any certification concerning their child's health or education."

Multiple school boards objected, not only because Youngkin's order flew in the face of scientific guidance from both the VDH and the CDC, but also because it violated the state law specifically requiring school boards to maximize protection against COVID-19 when offering in-person instruction. Youngkin remained unmoved, insisting that free parental choice must outweigh all other concerns (including student health and safety, actual science, and the law).

Seven Virginia school boards filed a lawsuit challenging Youngkin's executive order. On February 4, the court ruled in their favor, issuing a temporary restraining order against enforcement of Youngkin's order while litigation was pending:

"The judge found that the single issue before the court was whether Youngkin, through his emergency powers, can override the decision of local school boards delegated to them under a 2021 state law that required boards to provide in-person instruction in a way that adheres to Covid-19 mitigation strategies 'to the maximum extent practicable.' The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends universal masking, regardless of vaccination status. 'On this pivotal point, the Court concludes that the Governor cannot' override local school officials, the judge wrote in her ruling."

Naturally, Youngkin's office vowed an immediate appeal.

[randomnessoffiction]

Virginia's new GOP governor calls on parents to report teachers for "divisive" subjects

"And that gives us further, further ability to make sure we’re rooting it out"

OK people do your stuff! Clog up this line

[somethingusefulfromflorida]

When Republicans lose power, they spend their lame duck session changing the laws to neuter their successors. Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania all have Democratic governors but Republicans control the legislatures, so they stripped the governor of any real power before they were sworn in and could veto the changes. Same thing in Kansas and Louisiana and Kentucky; they can't appoint senators anymore, the legislature does. And in Arizona the Secretary of State has been stripped of her power to oversee elections because Republicans want to fuck around without oversight. Now the locals can do whatever they want without a big bad Democrat looking over their shoulder to prevent them from doing the very shit they cry foul of from 2020 (which didn't exist them but will exist in the future thanks to them). In Florida, the only statewide Democrat is the commissioner of agriculture, which may as well be the assistant vice lieutenant co-manager of the underwater basket weaver committee for all she's allowed to do.

What I'm saying is that the outgoing Democrats in Virginia have a chance to fuck over Youngkin and the incoming Republicans if they so desired. They have 2 months to pass whatever legislation they want to neuter his power, and they have so many examples to choose from thanks to their colleagues across the aisle. Follow the Republican example. Don't let your opponents hold a scrap of power. Do everything you can to hold them back. If they don't like it, they have no one to blame but themselves; they're the ones who did it in the first place, so they don't get to complain when their tactics are used against them.

But who am I kidding? Democrats will never do that. They'd never be ALLOWED to do that, even if they wanted to. The public expects more from the Democrats, they're always held accountable where Republicans are allowed to do whatever they want with no remorse, so public opinion would switch against them in ways it never switches against the Republicans. On top of that, the courts wouldn't let them do it either. The courts consistently let the Republicans get away with this kind of shit, but that's because the Republicans have spent the last decade packing the courts with right wing judges to get favorable rulings, so of course they wouldn't let the Democrats do the same thing. The inconsistency is the point. They don't want long-standing precedent, they want everything to be decided on a case by case basis so they can put their thumbs on the scale every time. They want a dynamic judiciary that they can manipulate, one that will change their minds whenever it's no longer advantageous to them. That's the goal. They want two systems, political apartheid, "one set of rules for us, one set for everyone else."

Until Democrats come to terms with that, all of their victories will be short term and meaningless, and all their failures will be tragic and avoidable.

[pscottm]

U-Va. board leaders resign as Spanberger and Democrats take power

The departures come as Democrats took other steps to quickly unwind some changes made at Virginia colleges during the administration of Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin.

The leaders of the University of Virginia’s board resigned Friday after Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger (D) asked them and at least three other appointees of her Republican predecessor to step down, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Rector Rachel Sheridan and the university’s vice rector, Porter Wilkinson, had been in the leadership posts since July. Among those also asked to resign was Paul Manning, a major donor to U-Va., three people said. The people, like some others interviewed for this article, spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the issue publicly.

Spanberger’s office, Sheridan and Wilkinson did not respond to a request for comment Friday.

The flagship university in Charlottesville had been in turmoil much of the past year, which included the resignation of its president, James E. Ryan, amid pressure from the Trump administration. The U-Va. board chose a new president last month, despite a request from Spanberger to wait until she could fill several vacant seats.

The shake-up on the board came a day before Spanberger is set to take office and as Democrats signaled they would move quickly to unwind some changes made at Virginia colleges during the Youngkin administration.

Jay Jones (D), the incoming attorney general, dismissed the general counsels at George Mason University and the Virginia Military Institute. Democratic legislators also pledged to make more changes in how the state’s public colleges are governed.

Some Virginia universities have faced intense scrutiny from the Trump administration and other conservatives in the past year over diversity, equity and inclusion policies, the response to antisemitism and the provision of gender transition care, among other topics.

In February, conservatives on the governing board at VMI declined to renew the contract of retired Army Maj. Gen. Cedric Wins, the military institute’s first Black leader, after years of tension over his DEI policies. George Mason has been the focus of multiple federal investigations, with university President Gregory Washington — that school’s first Black leader — often being the direct target of conservatives’ ire.

At U-Va., the Justice Department opened several investigations soon after complaints that Ryan and other university leaders had not moved quickly enough to unwind diversity-related initiatives.

Democrats and some students, faculty and alumni at colleges have criticized what they have called an inappropriate intrusion on university operations by the federal government. Some university board members also faced calls to resign.

State Democratic lawmakers also pushed back, rejecting nearly two dozen of Youngkin’s picks to college boards in recent months.

The rejections left only 12 of the U-Va. board’s 17 voting-member seats filled. Spanberger has said she would fill those vacancies on her first day in office.

In addition to the board leaders, Spanberger also asked Manning, who has donated $100 million to U-Va., along with Douglas Wetmore and Stephen Long, to resign, according to three people familiar with the matter. It was not immediately clear whether any others had already submitted their resignations.

“People were very surprised and saddened about Paul Manning,” said a person in the Youngkin administration. “He has been a selfless and tremendous benefactor of the University of Virginia. He doesn’t have a political bone in his body, and it’s just shocking that this would happen to him.”

Ryan has been critical of Manning and the U-Va. board’s leadership. In a November letter to faculty, Ryan wrote that Manning had initially told him not to resign as the Justice Department escalated its pressure on the institution. However, Ryan wrote that Manning later told him that the governor and Sheridan needed him to resign. Ryan said Manning had also heard from the Justice Department that if Ryan did not resign, officials would “bleed UVA white.”

“Rachel, Porter, and Paul should also take some responsibility for the decision to allow this to happen,” he wrote of his resignation.

The Washington Post also previously reported that in private texts, board members, including those asked to resign, plotted with Youngkin during major debates at the university. Wetmore, for example, wrote in a March message to Sheridan that leaders “need to move decisively at UVA to ban DEI and all forms and regimes of racial classification.”

The board members and Youngkin’s office did not respond to a request for comment Friday.

Republicans in the Virginia Senate questioned the move on social media.

Spanberger’s request for the resignation was first reported by the New York Times.

The Jefferson Council, a conservative alumni group, said Spanberger’s request was “not only legally questionable, it clearly represents a dangerous highly politicized power grab.” [Unlike the Republican ones}

“This action by Governor-elect Spanberger is unprecedented in the history of the Commonwealth and represents an extraordinary abuse of executive power,” the group said in a statement. [Gaslighting]

Meanwhile, additional leadership shake-ups were in the works at two other Virginia colleges.

George Mason University counsel K. Anne Gambrill Gentry and associate counsel Eli Schlam, along with VMI general counsel Patrick O’Leary, were notified this week by Jones’s office that Friday would be their last full days as their universities’ top attorneys,according to a VMI spokesperson and an email from Gentry reviewed by The Post.

Jones’s office did not respond to a request for comment Friday.

Gentry had been appointed by Republican Attorney General Jason S. Miyares, whose office also did not respond to a request for comment.

In Virginia, university counsels currently are named by and report to the office of the state’s attorney general. Their service, which includes providing legal guidance to the school in lawsuits and other operations, typically can span multiple administrations.

But as Miyares took office in 2022, he fired the top counsels at the University of Virginia and George Mason. At the time, a Miyares spokesperson said it was common for incoming attorneys general to appoint counsel that shares their “philosophy and legal approach.” U-Va. ’s counsel, Tim Heaphy, had also been on leave as he led a House investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

George Mason officials did not respond to a request for comment. Gentry, a GMU graduate, wrote in an email reviewed by The Post that Friday would be her and Schlam’s last full day as university counsel.

“It was a pleasure to represent my alma mater these past 19 years,” wrote Gentry, whose husband is a Youngkin donor.

VMI spokesperson Sherry Wallace confirmed that Friday was also the last full day for O’Leary, a VMI alumnus. He had served in the role since 2021 and was appointed by former Virginia attorney general Mark Herring (D).

“VMI’s general counsel received a letter late yesterday informing him that his services are no longer required by the state attorney general’s office and that today is his last day in the office,” Wallace wrote in an email.

Democratic state lawmakers have questioned how the governing boards at the institutions — dominated by Youngkin appointees — led the schools during those conflicts. State legislators are considering increasing board member terms to six years so no one governor’s appointees can ever dominate the board.

Virginia Senate Majority Leader Scott A. Surovell (D-Fairfax) said in an interview that he believes allowing universities to hire their own counsels will ensure the institutions can serve their best interests.

He said he approves of the dismissal of George Mason’s university counsel but didn’t have information as to why VMI’s attorney was fired.

“They need to be able to rely on solid independent legal advice of counsels of their choosing so they can make decisions not only on the best political interests of the attorney general that happens to be advising them” Surovell said.

In another sign of change at George Mason, rector Charles “Cully” Stimson tendered his resignation Friday in a letter obtained by The Post. Youngkin appointed Stimson to serve on the board in 2023.

Stimson, who has been George Mason’s rector since July 2024, has overseen the board as it sought to dismantle DEI and pare back other policies it saw as too liberal. Stimson recently quit the Heritage Foundation over concerns about the conservative think tank’s response to concerns over antisemitism. But this week, he said he was returning to the organization.

In his board resignation letter, Stimson called it an “extraordinary privilege and distinct honor” to be on the board. The note was addressed to Youngkin, Washington and vice rector Michael Meese. Stimson did not respond to a request for comment.

In an interview, Meese said he was “immensely grateful for working with Cully and thankful for his service on the board.”

[newspro2024]

Youngkin proposes tax relief on tips and cars in his adjusted Virginia budget plan

[virginiatowncrier]

Governor Youngkin highlights progress on I-81 corridor improvement project at briefing

The project, which aims to expand key areas of I-81 to three lanes, is progressing faster than expected.