Thank you for the very long answer to my prev ask :) It now brought to mind another, far nicher Greek Myth Retelling in a Historically Grounded (kind of) Way before it was cool which is Mary Renault's work - the mask of apollo, the king must die, the bull from the sea, the persian boy ... I really, really liked her books about Theseus and Minoan culture and I'm curious if you've ever picked them up
I KNOW Mary Renault is a familiar name to me in more than just an "I heard this author exists" way, I wonder if I read anything from her in highschool or something but I don't remember. I just read "The King Must Die" to check it out.
I did really like the general approach, IK a lot of things postulated in this book about Cretan society are informed by Sir Arthur Evans' Uh "Imaginative" interpretations of the palace at Knossos and are thus outdated, but it was still fun to see how the myth of Theseus and the Minotaur was reconfigured into something grounded. I think a lot of other books I've read who take that same general approach kinda feel like they're just checking off boxes of 'here's how this and that facet of the myth could be Real' in a way that feels I guess very perfunctory? just going down a list trying to find the most realistic point of comparison, as if mythology is just history after going through a couple rounds of telephone game, no imagination involved, no other purpose to the storytellers besides being a fully literal description of the past. Which also has a way of making the "real" story feel disjointed. And most of the main points didn't feel like that to me. "7 boys and 7 girls from Athens taken to feed the minotaur" being interpreted as "boys and girls from kingdoms throughout Crete's sphere of influence given as tribute and enslaved as ceremonial bullfighters at Knossos" was really cool, I love that concept. The way we're presented the "reality" and made to connect the dots to how it translated to myth over the course of centuries mostly feels very graceful. There were still bits that had the "checking off the box" quality for me (like I don't think we need a clean replacement for Pasiphae and the white bull, we don't really need the whole nine yards of "Minos spared a bull fighter because he was unwilling to sacrifice him and Pasiphae had an affair with him that involved hiding in a model of a bovine" when we could just say Pasiphae was thought to have had an affair with her husband's favorite bull fighter and Asterion was a bastard, and imagine how and why the gaps between that and the myth filled themselves) but on the whole it didn't feel like you were getting beat over the head with "HERE'S HOW IT COULD BE REAL".
I've read (much pulpier) prehistory historical fiction books from like the 80s, which came in the wake of the 2nd wave feminist movement and the pop archeology notion of "peaceful matriarchal earth goddess-worshipping culture overthrown by warlike patriarchal sky god-worshipping culture" as the grand arc of prehistory (read: European history) and it was really interesting to see the same idea in its gestation (albeit more grounded and not mythologized as a primordial fall from the Eden of peaceful goddess matriarchy; both groups share deities and cultural features and neither is peaceful) in a book from 1952 before later feminist movement-influenced authors ran with it and got silly about it in other ways. Also seeing this basic concept from the patriarchal sky god-worshipping culture POV (with intent that it is such, rather than this happening purely by default) was new to me.
There was this thing where like, plot significant events would either happen with little to no build up, or breeze by so fucking fast while being described with the most circumlocutory phrasing (or not at all) that I'd repeatedly be like "wait what" and have to go back and reread a passage several times to be sure what happened. Which I'm at least not used to having to do? I think the bit at the end where Theseus is startled by Something in Ariadne's hand was the worst offender. IDK if I'm just stupid or what, like I could put two and two together based on the scene/chapter and the entire book that she had participated in the Dionysian rites and that the King was probably killed by the maenads specifically, so it was probably something or other from him, but MAN is it vague to the point of not hitting for me, and it was like that a lot throughout the book. I wasn't that compelled by this Theseus or the story in general, but it kept me reading.
I also found the bit with the proto-Christian anticipating the arrival of proto-Jesus really funny, Yahweh wasn't even the subject of monolatry (much less exclusive monotheism) until a good ways into the iron age iirc? I'm pretty sure the timeline doesn't match up with the beginnings of Jewish messianism either, or the actual Philistines existing as a discrete group, much less as an exonym for ethnoreligious outgroups. I have no idea where the research on the history of the Abrahamic deity stood in 1952 and how much of a leap this was, it's just funny like what the fuck is this guy up to. Time traveler.