"men who have abused all their lives because of the expectation that they be baby incubators and then failing to meet that expectation should just take jokes about being 'breeding stock' (literally a term used for animals' lying down otherwise they must just not care enough about other queer men. no trans men are also gay men so this makes sense"
reevaluate your life twat
my poor confused friend, there is no one within the social reproduction of gender under capitalism that isn't expected to be a breeding machine. the term "breeding stock" is gender neutral, we are the proletariat; our assignment under Gender, as it is, is to reproduce more workers - no one goes untouched by that violence and we are all affected by it in many different ways.
this is not an exceptional form of oppression, but a particularity - one that is not owned by anyone body gendered in a given way.
there's plenty of trans gay dudes who're ok with being men and fucking other men at the same time - the problem is when trans men internalise radical feminism before transition and never develop an understranding of gender thats apart from its framework. This means that which informs the conception of transandrophobia is built upon a foundation that will never allow for liberation of any trans people.
call me a twat but theres obviously something important to talk about here otherwise you wouldnt have sent a petty little anon
What a round about way to say you think trans men are being babies and should just get over it. Fuck you.
mate, you're being facetious, the claim that anyone who claims to be the sole inheritors of a gendered violence are wrong, trans men are an example here but everyone does it. If anything, whats being claimed is that everyone is being a baby, trans men are not special or some targeted group here, by the words of op.. everyone can internalise radical feminism and have it fuck their views up.