Kayne from Malevolent's laugh sounds exactly like Tucker Carleson.

@theartofmadeline
Noah Kahan
No title available

Product Placement
cherry valley forever
Keni
hello vonnie

Origami Around

#extradirty
đ
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Mike Driver
$LAYYYTER
d e v o n

titsay
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Today's Document
YOU ARE THE REASON

Kiana Khansmith

Discoholic đȘ©
seen from Germany
seen from Netherlands

seen from France
seen from Colombia

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Taiwan

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from Czechia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@thatqueerpodcastfan
Kayne from Malevolent's laugh sounds exactly like Tucker Carleson.
This post is for like. 5 people and maybe a little TMI but I just need to say it
Simon from The Call podcast is giving huge power bottom energy in season 4 and I am Here For It.
This post is for like. 5 people and maybe a little TMI but I just need to say it
Simon from The Call podcast is giving huge power bottom energy in season 4 and I am Here For It.
Dames and Dragons
Title: Dames and Dragons
Persons Responsible:Â Kat (your DM), Kaitlin, Noel, and Sophia (your players), Donât Split the Podcast Network
Genre: Fiction, Adventure, Fantasy/Sci-Fi, Role-playing
Rating: 4.75/5, Yisss
How far did I get:Â Season 3, Episode 10 (end of The Gray Manacle arc)
Warnings:Â Described violence, peril, and death of NPCs (in-line with most fight-y RPG games), identity crises, some animal cruelty, well-deserved blasphemy
Notes:Â Estra is a utopia floating above an abandoned world. The city was raised generations ago by The Goddess, who still rules over Estra with the power granted to her by the three Beast Gods. Laika, Fran, and Corbin are the newest generation of guardians tasked with protecting the most recent reincarnation of The Goddess. After being raised by the descendants of the Beast Gods and trained their whole lives, they are most assuredly prepared for this task. Probably.
Do you like the fantastic shenanigans and soundtrack of The Adventure Zone, but wish there were more women involved? Do you like the creative world-building of Friends at the Table and Warda, but wish there were more fart jokes? Do you like heartfelt character arcs and player-driven stories, but want characters and players that are as lovely and interesting as they are dweeb-y?
If so, Dames and Dragons is right for you.
I cannot recommend this podcast enough. Iâm admittedly very picky about role-playing podcasts (especially after The Adventure Zone ruined me) but I truly think that this podcast has something for everyone.
For listeners new to D&D: the players and DM approach the game in such an open and expressive way that the math/logistics that are usually daunting are just one more way for a story to be told.
For listeners interested in world-building: The sense of history that Kat has built up into her campaign is delightful. Themes of how fallible history is and how changeable cultures are throughout time are constant, which make for very interesting culture shocks later in the campaign. NPCs fit into and build upon the world that Kat has built, and are memorable and (mostly) lovable to boot. In addition, the narration that does a large chunk of the world-building is simply good prose.
For listeners interested in character arcs: Laika (Sophie), Fran (Noel), and Corbin (Kaitlin) breathe such life into their characters that itâs very hard not to get invested in how they grow and learn. The players are actively invested in building their characters up and portraying them in such creative and context-aware ways. What start off as jokes become characteristics for their characters, which are often manipulated into f e e l i n g s. These players are adaptive and creative, and are great entertainers for any listener.
For listeners interested in kickass fighting : Laika and Corbin fuck some people up real bad.
For listeners interested in cool-as-shit magic: Fran is a wizard-extraordinaire. Corbin ranks a close second.
In addition to all of the points highlighted above, listener interaction (outside of Patreon even) is featured prominently and iTunes reviews are encouraged in very interesting ways.
In short, this is an unapologetically funny and well thought-out podcast, full of good world building and enthusiasm. Even in the darkest episodes, these players can find a way to make me smile and appreciate this incredible creative project theyâve put together.
And finally. There are openly queer and non-binary characters. Including all three main characters, who I am 60% sure are bi/pan disaster children.
Score Breakdown
Quality: 1
Concept: 1
Execution:Â 0.75 (the opening episodes was a little rough, but most bumps are ironed out within 3-5 episodes)
Interaction: 1
Miscellaneous: 1 (have I mentioned how much I adore the NPCs here?)
Bite-Sized Fiction
Most well-established fiction podcasts have huge backlogs of episodes. While this is a huge plus to some listeners, some (like myself) might be a bit intimidated and/or just want a fiction podcast that isnât a months-long commitment.
So here is a list of short fiction podcasts! If you are looking for something to fill a long plane ride, a road trip, or a boring day of work coming up, these should fit the bill nicely.Â
2298: After most humans were wiped out, what few remains are raised by The Network (think the Internet but in an Orwell novel). This stability is disrupted for human No. 24 when he sees a mysterious bird.
21 episodes at <10min apiece, or one 2 hour episode.
This story is set in a great example of surveillance state dystopia, but the plot manages to be a character-driven and original.
The Behemoth: Madyson is a troubled and aimless teenager, until a giant emerges out of Cape Cod and she becomes swept up in his cross country trip. Now she is a troubled teenager with a mission.
20 episodes 5-12min long.
This is a peaceful podcast, full of unknowable giants and a reminder that what we call âteenage angstâ is no less real for the teenager in question.
The Bunker: Join Tom, Dave, and David as they provide listeners with the latest news and hottest entertainment to be found in the post-apocalyptic hellscape that is now Earth.
12 episodes (plus 1 special) 1-2 hours long.
The Bunker combines the talent behind MarsCorp (review here) with the mania and cynicism of three men trapped in a bunker after the world ends. Lots of goofs, but there is very heavy content enclosed.
The Deep Vault:Â Earth is uninhabitable, so 3 friends seek out a bunker of local legend that offers the possibility of safety. However, what waits underground might be worse than what theyâre trying to escape.
7 episodes 20-35min
From the writers of Archive 81 (review here), this is a podcast equal parts survivalist horror and âwhoops our apocalypse plan went VERY wrongâ horror.
Life After: An FBI agent figures out that his dead wife left behind more than just a strong social media presence. However the price for getting access to âmoreâ is steep. See full review here.
10 episodes at 20-30min, plus followup.
A show full of intrigue and humanity, with a solid twist of distrust against technology and corporations.
The Message: A group of linguists are tasked with decoding a recently declassified transmission suspected to be from aliens. The stakes rise as the scientists realize that the message is not what they think. See full review here.
8 episodes at 10-20min.
This podcast has a plot I can only describe as âaction packedâ and sits at the intersection of science and science fiction.
Passage: Reporter Daisy Bonham heads to the Pacific Northwest to investigate new developments in the mystery of the SS Cumberland, which sank over 150 years ago.
7 episodes between 20-30min long.
This short series has local history, small town politics, and multiple mysteries. A short and spooky series with an incredibly satisfying ending.
organism: Organism lives in its room. Organism knows which humans are its friends and what colors it likes. Until Organismâs sense of security is shattered and it has to face the outside world.
5 episodes between 10-20min
This is a very interesting story of an alien species discovering the world that humans live in. Not very detailed, but it is an interesting romp through miscommunication
I will be updating and amending this list as time goes on!
Alice Isnât Dead
Title: Alice Isnât Dead
Person Responsible: Joseph Fink, Jasika Nicole, Night Vale Presents
Genre: Fiction, Horror, Fantasy/SciFi
Rating: 4/5, Yisss
How far did I get: All but the last episode (@A@)
Warnings: Body horror, graphic descriptions of violence, assault (heed the episode warning), and minor character death, road trip fatigue
Notes: Keishaâs wife Alice should be dead. But sheâs not. So Keisha does what any self-respecting should-be widow would do. She gets a job as a truck driver, traveling around the country and looking for her wife in the microcosms of America. While Alice eludes her, Keisha does find a chilling conspiracy that challenges almost everything she once considered âsafe.â
If you donât want to listen to a podcast about an anxious WOC truck driver roaming the country looking for her supposedly dead wife, I donât know if you can be helped.
As can be expected with any podcast associated with Welcome to Night Vale, the audio quality and voice acting is professional with some very good background music (which picks up speed in season 3). The narration transfers seamlessly between two modes. One is the very lonely middle aged woman, nursing her feelings of betrayal and trying to find some semblance of peace in the emptier spaces of the US. The second is that woman stumbling into conspiracies and liminal spaces and oddities, eventually shifting from incredulous to confused to fairly savvy. The end result is a not quite heartwarming, not completely bone-chilling, but deeply unsettling story that has its high points of emotionally charged character interactions and monster fights, but spaced out by long meditations on the US highway system and the micro-environments it connects.
With how non-concrete most of this story is, itâs surprising that the main antagonists-- capitalist and government conspiracies aside-- are some good old fashioned homicidal monsters, thistle men. What is very good about the thistle men is how despite them being described again and again as humanoid, they act as anything but. The resulting creature is a wolf in ill-fitting sheep clothing; which is a theme throughout the entire series and Finkâs writing as a whole.
Putting aside my preoccupation with monsters, I should mention that I found this podcast hard to get started on. While taken in aggregate the podcast tells a very compelling story, but the long lulls in actionable plot points near the beginning can be a bit intimidating to listen to all at once. I will say however that the end result is a story that doesnât try to fix its protagonists, portrays moral grayness as a tool of necessity (rather than self-interest), and emphasizes that trust of any kind is something that is earned rather than expected.
All in all, I would suggest this podcast to anyone who want to listen to an emotionally mature horror/mystery/thriller podcast, with the emphasis placed on the characters as opposed to the story that they are embedded within.
Needless to say, multiple characters within this podcast are gaaaaaaay.
Score Breakdown
Quality: 1
Concept: 0.75
Execution: 0.75
Interaction: 0.5 (minimal outside of ads, live shows are almost indistinguishable from studio episodes which is very interesting)
Miscellaneous: 1
Blog (temporarily) under construction
Hey dudes. Iâm going though and doing general maintenance on some older posts. Fixing typos, clearing up wording, and trying to add in how far I got into a given podcast before forming a review.
Iâm going to be reblogging any significantly changed reviews so heads up.
Done! Decided not to reblog updated blog posts because I changed pretty much every post.
Blog (temporarily) under construction
Hey dudes. Iâm going though and doing general maintenance on some older posts. Fixing typos, clearing up wording, and trying to add in how far I got into a given podcast before forming a review.
Iâm going to be reblogging any significantly changed reviews so heads up.
Ongoing Horror Anthology Podcast Cheat Sheet
One particular kind of podcast that deserves a bit more attention is the horror anthology. I feel like horror can easily be lumped into one blob of a genre (especially when drawing from multiple authors) but the subtle differences in anthology type and stories that these podcasts tell can really make or break listener experience. So! For people looking for a good spook but want minimal trial and error, I hope that this post can help.
Note that unless mentioned, these anthologies do not have trigger warnings or transcripts, please proceed with caution when selecting a horror podcast to listen to! A few of the podcasts listed here will be/have been reviewed in more depth in this blog.
Anthologies
PseudoPod: This podcast is one of the longest (if not The Longest) running horror podcast, with all 500+ episodes featuring free-range ethically sourced, independently written and/or performed horror stories and thoughtful but brief analysis for each featured story. The podcast site has a list of recommended episodes (http://pseudopod.org/new-to-pseudopod/) but most any episode you pick will be good. Stories featured go back to the 1800âČs to modern tales, contain POC, disabled, and queer authors and/or characters, and always contains information on further works by the writer and narrator.Â
All episodes have transcripts on the podcast site, trigger warnings are minimal
The NoSleep Podcast: All episodes are sourced from Reddit posts in the NoSleep subreddit or writer submission, with 11 seasons and options for season passes and/or additional content. If you want a list of recommended episodes, the podcast âAboutâ page has one https://www.thenosleeppodcast.com/new-to-the-nosleep-podcast. There are genuinely good stories within this podcast. However, I would proceed with at least some caution as the episodes I listened two had content ranging from cosmic horror to heavy body horror with little to no content warning.
All episodes have trigger warnings on the podcast site
Knifepoint horror: This podcast is a collection of minimalist stories written by Soren Narnia that I call âdad horrorâ (i.e. most characters seem to be middle aged men, calmly recounting their experiences) starting in 2010. Due to the single author and first person retrospective mode of narration in almost every episode, there are not many jump scares and very little body horror, as well as a very distinctive almost-calm method of telling these truly unsettling, sometimes meandering tales. Podcast website can be found here:Â https://knifepointhorror.libsyn.com/
The Lift: This podcast is a series of stories written by independent stories that all have a few things in common; a young girl named Victoria, a seemingly decrepit apartment, and a Test of Character for all the characters who venture in. Iâve already given my opinion on the podcast here, but I would at least give the first episode a try as it deals heavily in moral ambiguity and contributing authors often twist its central theme in several interesting ways.
Honorable mentions (anthology-like with central narrative that ties into shorter stories being told)
The Magnus Archives: The new archivist for an institution dedicated cataloging encounters with the supernatural goes about his job, recordings statements of those with encounters and investigating their validity. What starts off as an almost-anthology chock full of people from all walks of life grows into an intriguing mystery with almost too many facets to keep track of.
No trigger warnings or transcripts, but a thorough Wiki where episode summaries can be found.
The Dark Tome: In this short (9 episodes to date) but sweet show, a disillusioned teen finds a mysterious book while assisting the elderly man who runs a local bookstore. The book is a gateway into stories ranging from the tale of a trapped West Virginian coal miner to a fae ball. Episodes are interspersed with longer horror stories, all of which are choice.
I will be adding to this list and adjusting as I listen on.
SPINES
Title: SPINESÂ
Person Responsible: Jamie Killen, Wren Jones, ZoomDoom StoriesÂ
Genre: Fiction, Fantasy/Scifi, HorrorÂ
Rating: 4.5/5, YisssÂ
How far did I get:Â 3 episodes into season 3
Warnings: Body horror (heavy), character death, non-consensual attraction, anime references, Very Dubious (read: eugenics adjacent) ideas about geneticsÂ
Notes: Wren wakes up in an attic, submerged in a kiddie pool full of blood and with a strange man in a skull mask standing over her. Somehow she escapes, but doesnât know who she is, why she was there, or where all that blood came from. She does know she needs to find the other eight people who were in the attic, regardless of the consequences.
This is one of the first podcasts I listened to when I was getting into lesser-known podcasts, and it remains one that I recommend to anyone interested in horror. On the surface this podcast is very bare-bones, with one narrator telling a story in past tense with very little (if any) Foley work. The main narratorâs voice has a tinny quality to it that can get grating if you binge listen, however thatâs 1) only if you listen for it and 2) the only technical flaw that I could find.
With such a minimalist approach, a podcast like this has to put a lot more weight into its storytelling. I feel like amnesiac narrators are often written as audience stand ins, which can be interesting but is not what Iâm looking for in a character. I was relieved to hear that Wrenâs story is not one to be vicariously lived through. As she grows and discovers more about herself she becomes well-defined-- though not in an overt way-- with moral quandaries, self doubt, and all that messy stuff that makes characters fun. However while Wren is a mostly truthful narrator, she is also an unreliable one. As more permanent characters are introduced and additional narratives explored, this unreliability becomes prominent and makes for a very interesting way of re-framing and exploring past events. Secondary characters are fleshed out and flawed and driven in their own ways, and described in such a way that packs as much characterization as it can into as few words as possible.
Now for the thing that cemented this podcast as one of my favorites: the episode plots. Season one is mostly comprised of Monster of the Week (MOTW) plots connected by a season plot that amps up as Wren and the listener gain more context. This persists in the 2nd and 3rd season, though the season plots take a more central role. These MOTW plots are some of the most inventive and striking horror Iâve ever heard. While not all the people/things that serve as significant encounters for these episodes are malicious, all evoke incredibly specific imagery and are unlike anything Iâve heard before. Additionally, because of the narration style, there is less suspense and more wonder put into describing all of the sights that Wren comes across. This makes some of the gentler episodes downright dreamy, but the episodes with sharper stories have a seething wariness to them. The overarching season plots Iâm on the fence about. I enjoy how the writers space out plots points and have their characters falter and fail and backtrack throughout the season. But perhaps due to an unreliable narrator and/or the very periodic reveals pertaining to these overarching plots, they can seem to erratically jump forward.Â
Also there are queer and a non-binary characters (the latter of which Iâm still not sure how to think about, but they are explicitly outside of the gender binary). Whoo!Â
Score BreakdownÂ
Quality: 0.75Â
Concept: 0.75 (Iâm still pretty dang fuzzy on the motivations of the people behind the Big Season-Long Plots)Â
Execution: 1Â
Interaction:Â 1 (gives information on Patreon and such, gives chance to submit fan art to their site)Â
Miscellaneous: 1
2-for-1: The Message and LifeAfter
Titles: The Message, LifeAfter
Persons Responsible: Mac Rogers, Panoply and General Electric Podcast Theater
Genre: Fiction, Fantasy/Scifi
Rating
 -The Message/LifeAfter: 4.25, Yisss
How far did I get:Â Completed both series
Warnings
 -The Message: Graphic depictions of hospitalization/disease, human distress, and character death, scientists being nerds
 -LifeAfter: Discussions and depictions of post-death mourning, secondhand embarrassment, emotional manipulation, Evil Technology(tm)
Notes: Both of these podcasts are on the same iTunes page and put out by the same creators so I figured that if I was going to publish two reviews at once, these two would be good place to start and make up for the weeks I have neglected this blog.
 -The Message: Nicky Tomalin is a self-made linguist hired to document the progress of the Cipher Centers For Communication, which is tasked with decoding âThe Message.â The Message is a transmission originally recorded in 1945 and believed to be of extraterrestrial origin, but has only recently been released for private analysis. What starts off as speculations of aliens quickly spirals out of control as the research team finds that the stakes of figuring out The Message to be painfully high.
 -LifeAfter:  FBI agent Ross Barnes recently lost his wife Charlie, who left behind a large social media presence on a voice-only platform, VoiceTree. He replays her posts constantly, until he stumbles across something even better. Something that sounds exactly like her. Something that might be her. But it comes at a steep price, and Ross soon finds that everything he values in jeopardy.
Both of these podcasts are professional and crisp-- which might be in part due to the GE backing but I digress-- with professional voice acting and Foley work. The characters are diverse in motivation and outlook which is a great source of interesting conflict specific to the stories they play a part in. The Message sits at one of my favorite intersections; science fiction and scientists trying to figure out make sense of something completely beyond them. While this does give it an advantage in my review, where The Message goes above and beyond is by by making the very human need to understand in these scientists key to their survival (though this takes a few episodes to develop). In the same vein, the writers of LieAfter seem determined to throw all their characters in way over their heads. However LifeAfter seems like so much more of a personal story, hinging on personal grief, the misuse power, secondhand embarrassment, and a metric ton of intrigue.
The plots for both of these are full of twists and unexpected developments, to the point where I felt like I was listening to a completely different show by the time I reached the last episode of each. While I do love the unpredictability and the creative places that the writers take both of these stories, I felt like there was something missing. Yes, a good twist is a great tool for furthering a story and keeping the listeners engaged. But these twists need a base and having them come out of nowhere with minimal (circumstantial) evidence can be grating if done repeatedly. This can likely be attributed to the writers needing to cover all the story points they need to in a handful of episodes, but in effect this makes the plot seem a bit cramped.
All in all, both of these podcasts make for very entertaining, albeit short lived, listens with plenty of action, drama, and acknowledgement of things beyond human comprehension.
Also queer and non-binary characters. Whoo!
Score Breakdown
Quality: 1
Concept: 1 (emphasis on the original concept of The Message and how quickly it goes off the rails)
Execution: 0.5
Interaction: 0.75 (LifeAfter has a very cool followup interview with Neil deGrasse Tyson, but both offer little in the way of listener interaction)
Miscellaneous: 1 (personally, LifeAfter was a very important podcast for me as it dealt with the âuglyâ side to grief, which is a theme I think is important and under-explored.)
PleasureTown
Title:Â PleasureTown
Person Responsible: Keith Ecker and Erin Kahoa
Genre:Â Fiction, Anthology, Western
Rating:Â 4.25/5, Yisss
How far did I get: End of season 1 plus mini-episodes
Warnings: Period-typical racism, misogyny, homophobia, depictions of abuse, drug use, and violence, sass (Claude), doom and gloom (Cyrus)
Notes:Â This series follows the rise and fall of an Oklahoma city named Pleasure Town, which was founded on principals of hedonism and self-fulfillment. While the stories told are framed by the town founders Claudius âClaudeâ LeDue and Cyrus G. Hobbes, each episode follows a resident of the town and their checkered past. Examples include a woman escaping her abusive husband and making herself a name in the boxing ring, an ex-Mormon turned pleasure-seeker turned shaman, and a school teacher cursed to know too much about those around her.
I was a bit hesitant to get into this podcast, which could be attributed to my intense disposition towards fantasy and scifi audio dramas. However I was surprised with how much I like this podcast.
For starters, all of the voice actors featured here are fantastically genuine and the audio quality is great. While there are two main narrators for the series (Claude and Cyrus), each character has their own actor and the omniscience of Claude and Cyrus is challenged often. On top of being refreshing, this fallibility of the main narrators is an effective framing device that avoids the pitfalls of two white men explaining the experiences of POC, women, non-straight folks, and others that Pleasure Town seem to attract. From the first season, the creators encourage listeners to interact with this podcast and have a place on their website where listeners can submit story ideas, episode plots, and ask questions. Additionally, I very much like the original music made for this podcast!
The biggest concern I have for this podcast is that despite being a kind of anthology of indeterminate length, the narrators established a hard end to the story before the end of the first season. I worry this might box in episode plots in later seasons, but we shall see. The episodes themselves vary wildly in themes, settings, and narrator outlook but remain consistent in a dogged pursuit of self determination which looks different for each person.
There are also non-straight and gender non-conforming and POC folks featured prominently in this podcast. Yay! Full disclosure though, season one does not end happily for some of these characters and to be completely honest, Iâm still not sure how I feel about how the issue of gender non-conformity was dealt with (though it did stay true to the attitudes of the time period).
All in all, this podcast is a western anthology which bucks the genre by focusing on unconventional stories of people working for self-determination away from what was turn-of-the-century mainstream society. Itâs a very engaging and thoughtful story, rife with drama and personal struggles.
Score Breakdown
Quality:Â 1
Concept: 0.75
Execution: 1
Interaction:Â 1
Miscellaneous:Â 0.5
Science Vs.
Title: Science Vs.
Person Responsible:Â Wendy Zuckerman, Gimlet media
Genre: Non-fiction, Scripted, Educational
Rating: 3.5, Meeh
How far did I get: Iâve listened to ~10 episodes between 2016 and 2018
Warnings: Frank discussions of topics that listeners may find disturbing, flippancy
Notes:Â Science Vs. makes a point of discussing polarizing topics (e.g. abortion, fracking, artificial sweeteners) through the lens of peer-reviewed scientific literature and interviews with experts and/or people affected by the topics at hand. Episodes contain an accessible breakdown of a given topic, possible opposing views on debates around said topic, and a good deal of well-intended ribbing.Â
There are a lot of good things that this podcast has going for itself in terms of scientific literacy and journalism. Episodes remain fairly impartial to topics until there is significant evidence to make an informed decision. An impressive amount of research goes into each episode, evident in that the finer points of a given topic often come up, interviewers ask informed questions, and multiple viewpoints on a given topic are usually represented. There is the ongoing acknowledgement that while there might be a significant body of scientific evidence supporting or denying an opinion, no topic is as clear cut as we would like it to be. The audio quality is good-- which can be a bit touch and go in interview situations-- and the parts of the show that are not wading through research are littered with either humor or anecdotes. Finally, all interviewees are fully introduced, journal articles referenced are sourced, and show notes often contain recommendations for additional readings or resources useful to the listener.
However where I have second thoughts on this podcast is how science is often represented as somehow outside of societal influence. Donât get me wrong, the writers will often note if a cited study is founded on Bad Science or if there are limitations to a current body of research. Iâm more concerned about the viewpoint best crystallized by the episode intro hook â...but then thereâs scienceâ followed by a synthesizer choir cord. Believing that published scientific research is the end all for any debate is ill-advised, as academic research can be bogged down by conflicts of interest, bias, and an inability for credible research to reflect the reality of a situation. The pitfalls of relying on inaccurate data can be stemmed by providing sources and comparing studies-- as these creators do-- but thereâs a quasi-smugness in the writing that cannot be mitigated with thoughtful uptake of research data. The narration of this podcast can be thoughtful and funny and pokes fun often, but the air of almost-superiority that the host speaks with about science can be off-putting at its most benign and actively discredit personal anecdotes and/or contrary evidence at its most harmful.
All in all, if you want a well-grounded primer into a given issue, this podcast is a good resource. For instance, before going home and engaging with my environmentally-driven sister, I might listen to episodes on fracking, GMOs, and climate change to make sure I have at least a few facts straight. However, I would not rely on this podcast for all of your information (which is part of being a responsible learner but I digress) and would recommend in 1-3 episode chunks.
Score Breakdown
Quality: 1
Concept:Â 0.5 (expandable and well-intentioned, but limited in scope)
Execution:Â 0.75
Interaction:Â 0.75 (sources, trigger warnings, and resources are great, but see smugness comment.)
Miscellaneous:Â 0.5 (episode titles can be very clickbaity)
Archive 81
Title:Â Archive 81
Person Responsible: Â Marc Sollinger, Dan Powell
Genre:Â Fiction, Fantasy/Scifi, Horror
Rating:Â 4.75, Yisss
How far did I get: Middle of season 3
Warnings:Â graphic descriptions of body horror, death, psychological distress, animal cruelty, unthinkable horrors
Notes: Season one features found footage of the missing Dan Powell (published by concerned friend Marc Sollinger) listening to and archiving a series of taped interviews for the Housing Historical Committee of New York State. What starts off as a series of conversations with the eclectic residents of a particular apartment building quickly spirals into a mystery which is surprising as it is unnerving. Unfortunately I cannot talk about season two without discussing spoilers (which is why this review is on the shorter side) but let me tell you dudes, itâs gosh dang doozy.Â
My pre-review notes say the following:Â âArchive 81 is what Lovecraft could have been had he not been such a racist malnourished turd.â
The setup and carrying out of the audio in this podcast is great, i.e. the found footage has its limitations, its reasons for existing, and the quality of the recording and voice acting is fantastic. I admit that it took me awhile to get my footing in season one since the writers really played a long game but it pays off in a big way. Characters are shown to have both on and off-screen actions (which I think is an important element of found footage that isnât often explored), complex feelings based on past and present circumstances, and shifting motivations based on their situations. These authors are particularly proficient in moral grayness and it shows. In addition, the intros and outros tell a story of their own while being informative and to the point. Reasons for episode delays and changes in scheduling are clearly communicated.
Where I believe the Lofecraftian comparison rings truest is the settings Mr. Sollinger and Mr. Powell atmosphere. From the cramped isolation of Danâs season one workplace, to the weirdly close but disconnected micro-ecosystems that develop in large city apartment buildings, to the unspeakable horrors of season two, the writers nail the ambiance they are aiming for with minimal exposition. Whatever twists and turns that the story takes the listener, the writers take special care to set scenes in a way that is very poignant and triples the efficacy of their storytelling.
Also queer characters! Whoooo!
Score Breakdown
Quality:Â 1
Concept: 0.75
Execution: 1
Interaction: 1
Miscellaneous:Â 1
Sable
Title: Sable
Person Responsible: Lane Lloyd
Genre: Fiction, Horror, Fantasy/Scifi
Rating: 2.5/5, Meeeh
How far did I get:Â End of season 2
Warnings: Graphic descriptions/descriptions of body horror and violence, themes of death, extreme psychological distress, gaslight-y themes, and violence
Notes:Â Sable is a universe of malicious Old Gods, secret societies of magic users, corrupt governments, and more. The first season covers a war between a violent cult and an organization of mages and the violent, horrifying crimes that led up to it. The second season covers how a small town sheriff copes with her town preacher committing unspeakable acts, the zany reality bending that ensues, and the musical smile-worshiping zealots possibly responsible.
This podcast has its ups and downs. To be honest Iâve listened to two seasons and while Iâm not sure if I like it or not, I can see why people would like it without reservation.
Episodes are a single voice narrating a given story with very very few background noises, music (sans the main theme), or voice-alteration and are in a way like an audio book. The audio quality and pace of narration is good, however there is a lot of rambling in the outros. Likewise, I sometimes find myself a bit frustrated with the narration. I do not like shock value (i.e. gore) or iconoclasticism much, which seem to be staples in this method of story telling. The first season almost put me off altogether when one of the characters ended up in a mental institution and almost all female characters were either villains or victims. These things did clear up in season two, but I did have to take a long break between seasons.Â
However. I said that podcast has its ups and I meant that. For starters, the imagery that Lloyd invokes is inventive and horrifying. I love me a good monster as much as the next person, but Sable scratches a particular itch that I have for new and good horrors. Season plots are multi-faceted and always leave me guessing. The motivations and unique circumstances that characters come from are well-illustrated and consistent. In terms of story and character construction, Sable is a solid podcast.
Also there are multiple non-straight and polyamorous characters! Whoo!
Score Breakdown
Quality:Â 0.75
Concept: 0.5 (inventive and expandable but not much connective tissue)
Execution:Â 0.5
Interaction: 0.25 (content warnings would be much, much appreciated)
Miscellaneous: 0.5
Wonderful
Title: Wonderful
Persons Responsible: Griffin and Rachel McElroy
Genre: Non-Fiction. Stream of Consciousness
Rating: 4.25, Yisss
How far did I get: Caught up (as of Nov 2018)
Warning: Extreme wholesomeness, McElroy shenanigans
Notes: The premise of this podcast is that Rachel and Griffin sit down and talk about things that they/their listeners like. Thatâs it. Thatâs the whole thing.
In the Google Doc where I keep track of which podcasts I want to listen to/have downloaded/have reviewed I sometimes keep abridged versions of reviews. In the case of âWonderfulâ I noted the following: âGood and wholesome content. A shining beacon of light in this sinful world.â After putting my thoughts into a longer format, I stand by that assessment.
There is something incredibly refreshing about a podcast based on the idea that âfuck it. No. Weâre just going to talk about things that we like.â I admit that I can sometimes get caught up in negativity and the pervasive norm that disliking things is somehow... more acceptable than enthusiastically liking things. The podcast is the antidote to that pessimism and I often re-listening to episodes on my walks to work before a trying day. Things brought up in these episodes include regular poetry readings by Rachel, Griffin talking about game design and mechanics, foods and music they both enjoy, and many more off-the-wall topics that (at risk of soundly schmaltzy) make you appreciate the small things more.
On top of the delightful content, the audio quality is professional. In terms of listener engagement, email submissions are regularly shared and topics covered are made accessible to listeners. Additionally, Rachel and Griffin talk often about their transition from hosting their podcast about The Bachelor/The Bachelorette franchise podcast âRose Buddiesâ and possible complications.Â
I will admit that the concept of the series is a bit looser than I am accustomed to (and sometimes it shows in how the episodes break down) and there are some things that these two bring to the table that donât play too well over an audio-based media. However Griffin and Rachel are able to turn even the most rudderless conversations into something that is genuinely enjoyable. These two have great a dialogue in this podcast.
All in all, this is a podcast best enjoyed on days when youâre kinda down. One might even all it a feel good podcast.
Score Breakdown
Quality: 1
Concept: 0.75
Execution: 0.75
Interaction:Â 1
Miscellaneous: 1
This post was a collaboration between myself and Elena FernĂĄndez-Collins. It was cross-posted on Bello Collective.
You and your microphone and maybe some of your friends have concocted a plan: youâre going to make a podcast! Itâs a lot of fun, and you find some helpful articles about sound editing. After trying to figure out what the best hosting service is and drowning in Libsyn versus Podbean comparison charts, you put it up on iTunes and maybe Stitcher. Youâve got social media accounts and, hopefully, you even have a website. But youâre still not getting as many downloads as you thought and breaking through to be visible is a little harder than youâd imagined. Maybe you should tell someone about it? Someone who can get you exposure? Maybe someone like a critic or a reviewer, who has covered your podcast style or genre in the pastâââlike the people writing this article! And the people writing this article want to hear from you, but we want to hear from you especially if you come with a press kit.
A press kit (or media kit, or press pack) is a document that contains all the necessary, up-to-date information and art about something that you are producing or selling, no matter what industry youâre in. Weâre here to guide you through the whys and hows of the podcast press kit so that your hard work can flourish and even, perhaps, get a review you didnât expect to!
Note: Weâll be referencing a lot of different, wonderful press kits and websites in this article. Be sure to check the end for links to every press kit used, as well as more examples to reference.
Why Do I Need a Press Kit?
If youâre asking yourself something along the lines of âArenât press kits for, like, major media and startup launches?â or âPress kits arenât for podcasts!ââââI hate to break it to you, but your podcast is basically a startup. Itâs a media product that needs a press kit so that you can pitch it, sell it, and describe it. So why does anyone build a press kit, and why should you?
It will help you become and look more professional, because professionals have press kits. âIâm only in this for fun!â Well, okay, but if you take this step, making a press kit and looking professional will in turn:
Help reporters an untold amount when theyâre building an article of any kind that might reference your podcast, including if theyâre going to do so without informing you first! For instance, if thereâs a press kit available, theyâre more likely to include your podcast in a playlist. That means even if youâre just making this podcast for fun, youâll get a lot more coverage if you put in the effort for the long-run.
Smooth the way for you when youâre pitching your podcast to both journalists and sponsors. Youâll be able to attach it to emails or link to it so that they can read all about your show and you donât have to write the same description every time.
Having a press kit helps your brand spread! People can use it to spread the word about your podcast, without you having to do it!
Making a press kit will help you think critically and deeply about your podcast, about what goes into and how to describe it. This is your number two recourse to answer the question âwhy should people listen to my podcastâ, after your own elevator pitch.
This is a saturated world of media, not just podcasts. Having a press kit makes you stand out from the crowd as someone who is professional, put together, and serious about their work.
You wonât believe me until you get to it, but building your press kit will help reinvigorate and ground you in what it is that you love about this project, whatever the reason is for starting it! Other than necessary details, youâll be talking about what youâre doing, who youâre doing it with, and showing people your art and trailers. Itâs a good way to both cement your plans and keep an open mind as to where you can flex your creativity.
Press kits help you and your team, whether itâs a team of one or 500, your audience, whether itâs an audience of your closest friends or millions of downloaders, critics, and all the people who donât know about you yet!
Get yourself a press kit.
How to Make a Press Kit
For Individual Podcasts
So, youâve decided to make a press kit. Hooray! Before we talk about getting fancy with design, letâs run down some basic guidelines for the contents of your press kit.
A good way to think about what should go in the kit is asking yourself what a reviewer might want to discuss if your podcast were to be featured. Your kit should include information and assets that will entice the reviewer to listen, but what will they need when writing about your podcast? What is the 101 on your podcast? Who is the reviewer going to credit for what? Which aspects of your podcast do you want to highlight?
First and foremost, letâs go over the structure of a press kit. Weâre big fans of kits that come in the form of a Google Drive folder or zip file; these setups will allow you to provide a PDF fact sheet as well as supplemental assets that reviewers love to have on hand. Your kit is, of course, a kitâââit should have several different pieces, all contained within one folder.
Here are the things that should be in your fact sheet PDF, which will be the biggest and most important part of your press kit, and should take up around 1â3 pages. You can order these sections any way that you think works best for your podcast, but this is the order we like best for most shows:
An introduction: The beginning of your fact sheet should include your podcastâs title, a very quick introduction to what it is (yes, explain that your podcast is a podcast, but also give a genre or format), where listeners can find your podcast (especially if youâre in the Paid Listens program through RadioPublic!), a link to your website, your upload schedule, andâââif you plan on including graphicsâââyour cover art used by podcatchers. (For more on graphics, make sure to reference the âFormattingâ section down below.)
Your podcastâs summary: This is a no-brainer, but as Wil has found out, a lot of podcasts have pretty terrible summaries. Your summary should be about one paragraph long, and it should explain the format, the genre (be specificââââaudio dramaâ is not a genre; it is a medium!), the concept, the hosts where applicable, and a synopsis of the plot where applicable. We also like having two different summaries: one thatâs short, snappy, and can easily be quoted in a review, and one thatâs a bit more specific and in-depth. Make sure to clearly break these two up.
Your release schedule: Provide a section that has your release schedule, both past and present. If youâre changing your release schedule, this is where you put what itâs going to look like in the future. And put your current status: are you on hiatus? When are you starting up again? When is your current season or run ending? Give people a sense of timelines.
Cast and crew list: When writing a review, writers need to know who to credit for what part of your podcast. Tell us who voices which characters, and include headshots if you can. Credit your hosts, editors, producers, writers, and sound designers. Short bios are always a plus. Make sure you include social media links for everyone involved in your podcast!
Press coverage and review quotes:Â Have you had reviews and press coverage before? Do you have particularly glowing iTunes reviews? Include quotes and links to those times in its own section. Donât include all them! Have a selection of reviews and coverage that were complimentary in a detailed fashion, well-written, and, for more in-depth reviews, considered multiple aspects of your work. Remember to include author names and where you got it from. If theyâre a reviewer or reporter, make sure to include what publications they write for and a link to the review.
Accessibility: You should have transcripts. If you have transcripts, make sure to mention it and link to where they can be accessed. If you have plans to have transcripts in the future (you should), write in a description about the timeline for your transcripts. For instance, Love and Luckâs press kit makes a note that they have captioning available on YouTube:
Patreon and other support information:Â Donât shoot yourself in the foot. The podcast world is as full of independent work as any other media. Provide links to where people can support your work financially, be it Patreon or ko-fi. Are you currently running a Kickstarter or other crowdfunding campaign? Talk about it here.
Your podcastâs contact information:Â Make sure to include different ways writers can get into contact with you or talk you up on social media. Be sure to include the showâs email address (or your email address, if the podcast doesnât have its own) as well as all of its socials:Twitter, Tumblr, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, etc. handles and links. If your podcast has a Discord, include an invitation linkâââand make sure it isnât the type that expires.
Anything else:Â Thereâs a lot of things you can include in press kits. Weâve highlighted the things we find the most important and most useful.. But if thereâs something special about your show or something you want to make sure is included, you definitely should. Here are some examples:
LGBTQ+ friendly and created, like this little banner in the Alba Salix kit:
The rating and global content warnings (you should be including major content warnings in every episode), like these brief notes at Girl in Space:
Listening statistics, which can be as in-depth or as brief as you like. Consider this bit from A Thousand Things to Talk About:
According to PodTrac, the show currently averages between 17,000 and 22,000 90-day downloads across the full catalog.
The unique global monthly audience is around 1,100 individuals as of March 2018.
The largest listening audience is in the United States. Turkey, Venezuela, the UK, Belgium, France, Mexico, and Germany also account for a large number of downloads. Listeners with more than 100 downloads in the last year come from 38 countries.
We currently have an average 5 star rating on iTunes.
Here are things your press kit should have that should be outside of your fact sheet PDF:
Promotional images in various sizes:Â Most writers will need images from your podcast to use in articles, especially for headers. Including these in your press kit makes the process much smoother and more efficient for writers. Images should include your podcastâs art as it appears on podcatchers, any other official art used, headshots, and weâre never mad at behind-the-scenes pictures. If you want to make sure your artists get credited if those images are used, be sure to give credit in your PDF.
An audio trailer for your podcast: Audio trailers are few and far between right now, but each time we get one, weâre ecstatic. A short-form introduction to your podcastâââand especially what your podcast sounds likeâââis a great way to hook a reviewerâs attention. You can model these after The Big Loopâs trailer for their episode âGoodbye Mr. Adams,â which is included in their press kit. The Podcast Host also has a handy how-to guideon making a podcast trailer.
This comprises the content that you should be writing up and pulling together for your press kit. But wait, thereâs more!
Does your podcast belong to a network? Are you planning on starting one? You can guess what weâre going to say:Â your network needs a press kit.
For Networks
Youâve started a podcast network or collective! (Weâre just going to be saying ânetworkâ to be concise). Maybe itâs like FateCrafters Studios, a group of audio fiction shows that have their own production teams, but are linked by the desire to join a family-style support network for their chosen medium. Maybe itâs like the Indie Creative Network, a space and company of various forms of digital media all run and hosted by People of Color and provide podcast production services for businesses. Or maybe itâs like WNYC, which is less a podcast network and more, you know, public radio with podcasts (or maybe youâre a college radio station!).
So why does your network need a press kit, if each of your shows have their own? Your network might want to go on tour or need sponsors and press coverage, or a journalist might want to interview your board or your core team. Think big-picture. If youâve got a lot of shows in a network, you need a press kit to cover the network as its own business or media enterprise.
Structure your networkâs press kit like a podcast press kit: via a .zip file or Google Drive, with promotional images separate from the fact sheet PDF. Hereâs what should absolutely be in your fact sheet PDF:
Mission statement: Your network needs some kind of mission statement or unifying idea so that people know why you are a network, what is your networkâs purpose. Check this mission statement from Indie Creative Network:
The ICN.DJ mission is to elevate and advance the careers of People of Color in the Digital Media space. Our platform is used as a hub to discuss topics important to the progression of our tribe.
The intent of our content is to engage, entertain, educate and inform our listeners/viewers, on a variety of topics important to their everyday lifestyles.
Or check what can be found in the FateCrafters Studios About page:
[The storytellers] have come together to collaborate, and share ideas on all matters of audio drama, be it storytelling, production skills, promotion, or acting. Their aim is to help and support each other in the creative process, so that they can bring you the best in immersive drama possible.
Great mission statements! Also, theyâre a good way to work in another important aspect that should be covered in this same section:
Network methods: Something people will always be interested in is how the network functions as a group. The FateCrafters About page describes this, but here is an interesting take from Multitude Productions, right before their mission statement.
Multitude is a well-worn idea for the unknown future: a collection of friends working together professionally. Do we contradict ourselves? Alright, let us explain it another way.
We are a production collective of independent audio professionals.
Theyâre friends and they work together professionally as independent audio professionals striving towards a common goal. Think of other things that might be important to highlight. Do you share profits? Are you independent shows with the same people working on multiple shows or do you share as a big community with separate projects? Do you provide services of any kind? Provide some kind of description of the internal workings of the group, even if itâs something you think someone might overlook. They wonât.
List of shows: Clearly the most important part is to include a list of shows that are in the network! Provide a brief description, usually the kind that goes into iTunes, and links to their own websites and social media. Ideally, also include their podcast icon art so that people associate that art with your network. Look at these lists of New York Public Media properties and WNYC shows from New York Public Mediaâs kit:
Board members:Â Or whatever you have that are similar to board members, like your core team running the network or your elected officials. Make sure to include headshots and brief bios, like you would for a cast list, because this is basically your network cast list. Donât forget about your website IT person and artist!
Network methods:Â Something people will always be interested in is how the network functions as a group. The FateCrafters About page describes this, but here is an interesting take from Multitude Productions, right before their mission statement:
Multitude is a well-worn idea for the unknown future: a collection of friends working together professionally. Do we contradict ourselves? Alright, let us explain it another way. We are a production collective of independent audio professionals.
Theyâre friends and they work together professionally as independent audio professionals striving towards a common goal. Think of other things that might be important to highlight. Do you share profits? Are you independent shows with the same people working on multiple shows or do you share as a big community with separate projects? Do you provide services of any kind? Provide some kind of description of the internal workings of the group, even if itâs something you think someone might overlook. They wonât.
Listening statistics: This may be a little more important for your network than for your podcastâs own press kit, depending on how you want to look at it. But you could include listening stats across your shows, averages of how many people listen to shows in your network and where they are listening from, for instance. For your network, this will show the spread and popularity, which may be important to consider when pitching to sponsors for a tour for example.
All right. You now have all the content for a press kit for your podcast and for your network. But what should the formatting be like? Is there a âpress kit standardâ? What do you use to make a press kit? Hereâs some dos and donâts for formatting, and some important suggestions.
Formatting
When formatting your press kit, form should follow function. Your press kit should be used to help brand your podcast and convey its tone, but more importantly, it should deliver information and be easy to read.
Take, for instance, Girl in Spaceâs press kit. Girl in Space has an iconic teal-on-purple color scheme for its branding, used throughout its website:
For its fact sheet PDF, though, the podcast opted instead for black text on a white background. The design is sleek, simple, and easy to read. The science fiction feeling is conveyed through the minimal sans-serif font:
If you wanted something with more graphic elements, Alba Salixâs press kit is a great structure to follow. The headshots of the cast and crew are fantastic, and the inclusion of metrics is as professional as it is informative. The brand identity is clear while not being obtrusive:
If you want to go for a minimalist design, you can very easily format your fact sheet in Microsoft Word or any other similar word processor and then save it as a PDF. If you want something more advanced, though, here are some resources you may want to use:
PowerPoint has some really lovely formats, and the 16:9 ratio offered can usually accommodate graphics better than a traditional 8.5Ă11â page.
Adobe Spark and Canva both have free press/media kit formats, usable once youâve signed up for a free account.
Xtensio also offers free, dynamic, modern-looking templates for press kits.
Bloop Animation has this how-to guide for making a press kit, and it includes a template you can use.
Creative Market has a list of 20 press kit templates that all look beautiful and professional. Theyâre not free, but Creative Marketâs accounts areâand they get you six free graphics a week. Sometimes these graphics are things like press kit formats, but itâs also just a great resource for design assets.
So Youâve Made a Press Kit (Great Job!)
Congratulations! Making a press kit is a lot of work, and weâre already impressed that you made one.
But now youâve got some work to do. Press kits arenât things that you just hold for safekeeping. You put so much work into your kitânow, you have to make sure to use it!
Where do I put my press kit?
First off, put your press kit in the first point of contact with a podcast journalist. Donât make the journalist reach out to you asking for a press kitâââinclude it off the bat, and even if they donât need it, itâs not going to do any harm. We might be a little biased, but we think itâs a good practice to make the review process as easy on journalists as possible. Adding your kit right when you initiate contact is a great way to show that youâre of that same philosophy, and that youâve done the work journalists like to see.
You should also, of course, have your press kit up on your website. You can link the file, orâââmuch more preferablyâââyou can do a page version of the PDF and link your press kitâs file there. Han and Matt Know It All have a discreet link to their lovely press kit page at the bottom of their website:
Love and Luck has a similarly robust press kit page, linked right in their top menu:
That is, of course, as long as you have a website. You do have a website, right? Well hey, if not, weâre going to talk more about that process in another future article.
So thatâs it, right? Iâm done?
Nope!
Think of them like a pet or a child: theyâre living, dynamic documents that need to go out into the world and change along the way, but they can only grow up with your help. Your press kit is going to need maintenance. If youâre running a Kickstarter/Indiegogo or started up a Patreon, update your press kit. If you add a new cast member, update your press kit. If you hit some exciting landmarks in download numbers, update your press kit. If your sound designer finally gets a Twitter, update your press kit. If your upload schedule changes, update your press kit. As a best practice, you should check your press kit at least once every other month for accuracy.
What are some good examples of press kits?
Several of these examples were used to help make this article. Weâve referenced some of our very favorites or websites with good content, but weâre so happy to see more and more lovely examples out there.
Audio drama
Alba Salix
Four Mondays
Girl in Space
Love & Luck
Ostium
Palimpsest
The Amelia Project
The FORJ Collective
The Once and Future Nerd
Nonfiction
A Thousand Things to Talk About
BitRate
Han and Matt Know It All
Spirits
Networks/Collectives
EAST Corp
Multitude
New York Public Radio
Press Play on a Podcast Press Kit This post was a collaboration between myself and Elena FernĂĄndez-Collins. It was cross-posted on Bello CollectiveâŠ