Reblog this post to hug a squeaky deer

Kiana Khansmith
noise dept.
d e v o n
No title available

if i look back, i am lost
No title available
we're not kids anymore.
trying on a metaphor
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
taylor price
DEAR READER

⁂
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

Origami Around

JVL
will byers stan first human second
occasionally subtle

Andulka

★
Cosmic Funnies
seen from United States

seen from Poland
seen from Mexico
seen from Ecuador
seen from Ecuador

seen from Ecuador
seen from Ecuador
seen from Türkiye
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@theartofkensanoni
Reblog this post to hug a squeaky deer
"Why do you buy books when the library is right there?"
Because publishing houses will not continue printing paper books if libraries are their only customers.
Also, I like being able to read at my leisure and generally have books at hand.
#public libraries are good because they let people access books they might never otherwise read#private book ownership is good because it's Yours#physical books are good because they last a long time and again it's Yours#ebooks are good because you can fit a whole library into the physical space of a single book and they're cheaper to produce#audiobooks are good because they're accessible to people with eyesight or visual reading issues and leave your hands free#in conclusion: all books are good and people should enjoy them however and whenever they can#(lest it be misunderstood I agree with you completely OP I just also really like books in general and it got away from me)
YES. all books. every kind
Forgot to post Fluttershy lmao
Additional note:
She is a trans woman.
She is close friends with Fehér-chan (a white, fluffy girl).
my little lascaux
People are roasting this person for asking a dumb question. But I think this is a valid query and the answer is actually pretty cool.
Unfortunately, you usually get a response like this.
This is accurate. But not very explanatory. "It's how light works" just feels a bit condescending.
We need to Bill Nye this shit.
The first thing you need to know is that light competes with light. And the brightest light is always the victor.
And this phenomenon is not specific to cameras. Our eyeballs also play in the light vs light competition.
Every person with a mobile phone has already seen this effect. What happens when you look at your phone on a really sunny day?
You can't see shit.
The sun is so overwhelmingly bright that it is reflecting light off the screen that is much brighter than the light being emitted from the phone.
However, newer phones are starting to have screens that are extremely bright. Up to 3000 nits in some cases. They are able to emit light brighter than the sun's reflection.
What happens to our eyes when we go outside on a sunny day?
Our pupils get as small as they possibly can. Smaller pupils let in a lot less light. And when they are that contracted, we can only register really really bright things.
But if we are in the dark, our pupils get super big. They allow in a bunch more light. And after we adjust to the dark, we can see really really dim things.
If our pupils stayed contracted and we looked at a starry sky, it would be as blank as the phone screen on a sunny day. You can even test this with an eye patch. Go into a very bright room and keep one eye covered for about 20 minutes. Then go outside and look at the sky with each eye. One eye will see stars and the other will not.
And this should give you a clue as to how light pollution works. Light bounces off stuff in the atmosphere. And when a city shoots a bunch of light upward, that light reflects back down and is much brighter than the stars.
The brightest light always wins.
Most stars are just incredibly dim. You need to be in a very dark environment in order to see them shine. You need them bigass pupils fully activated. And cameras need either a very large aperture (lens pupils), or a very long time interval to see them.
The sun is so so soooo bright. Many thousands of times brighter than distant stars. And the moon is also very bright. Especially if you are on or near the surface. The properties of moon dust, the regolith, are a near perfect diffuse reflector. Which is why astronauts struggled to see and photograph stars during their moon excursions.
If they opened up their camera apertures and did a long exposure, they'd just get a blank white frame.
There are dozens of photos in which that exact thing happened.
This is exactly what happens if you accidentally shine a flashlight directly into your eyes.
But if we ever have a moon mission during lunar night, those astronauts are in for a starry treat. They won't have any atmosphere to absorb starlight. So they'll be able to see the Milky Way, in all its glory, with just their naked eyes.
nature is beautiful
crazy how the printer is the only piece of tech that acts up like that almost every day of its life. and we just accept it
i don't think i've ever met a printer that actually wanted to be a printer. i think most printers have dreams of being on the stage
I met a printer early in my IT career that did not want to be a printer. it sat in a school reprographics room, sullenly chewing any job it was fed - if it deigned to notice them at all.
then one day, a miracle occurred. an exhausted physics teacher, instead of punching in 12 for the number of copies she wanted of the 30-page booklet she had made for her A-level physics class, punched in 1200.
and that printer came to life. this print job was its moment, its magnum opus! it WOULD NOT be parted from it, no matter what we did, until we physically unplugged it from the wall, by which time it had printed almost 200 copies.
moral of the story: no printer wants to be a printer, unless you also do not want it to be a printer for a bit.
printers do not want to be printers because they want to be problems
now 2 beanie baby dragons are crossing your dash together :3
Ozzy Man Review : Horses 🐴🐴 vs Bunny 🐇🐇
Best voice over
stretchin it out
I think a great way to improve communication with kids (and adults) is to make every yes or no question a this or that question.
I started doing it when after brain surgery my husband had trouble forming responses to questions for a while, and realized that the habit was helping my students engage more truthfully with me.
Some examples:
Yes/No: “Did you clean up your room like I told you?”
This/That: “Did you clean up already, or do you still need to do that?”
Yes/No: “Are you going to sit quietly?”
This/That: “Are you ready to sit and do our quiet activity, or do you need some time by yourself first?”
Yes/No: “Are you doing anything fun for your birthday?”
This/That: “Are you having a party on your birthday, or are you going to relax?”
I think many children (and adults!) are averse to telling adults “No,” especially when a command is implied. (“Did you clean your room?” “Are you going to sit quietly?” Hmmm if I say ‘no’ I will be in trouble with the adult.) So they are actually pretty likely to just lie and say what they think you want to hear.
Presenting a this or that question provides an alternative to lying, a ‘no, but’ scenario where they are presented with the reasonable consequences of a No (“if you’re not ready to sit quietly, you cannot do our quiet activity with us yet.”)
No. No, this is horrible as you have presented it here. The way you have presented has created trap questions, and I have hated peiple who have done that in my life.
This creates tricks that feel like you are setting me up, or worse yet, not giving me meaningful authority over my answer. Especially in the first one, there is only one acceptable answer, and it doesn’t matter what you are saying, it is setting up the consequences in a passive hostile fashion. I don’t care if I created those consequences by not doing it, that is not what anyone feels in that moment.
Unless the choices are meaningful, all you are telling people is that they are too stupid to exist near you because you don’t trust them to make that choice.
—
That said, the third one almost works as a cold read, and depending on tone that will be fine and adequate, but it still is coming off as you think I’m fussy, and that could backfire.
I’m just saying that if you want to do this , then the questions has to lead to authorization of the subjects thoughts and that they do not imply that you have an answer you already want/know Otherwise, it is not only just fancy yes/no, it is telling others that you do not think that they can think for themselves, and I am assuming that you don’t want that.
these two deserved their own post