PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
šŖ¼
@theartofmadeline
PR's Tumblrdome
I'd rather be in outer space šø
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
taylor price
shark vs the universe
AnasAbdin
Misplaced Lens Cap
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
hello vonnie
NASA
titsay
Origami Around
Sade Olutola
Keni
Three Goblin Art
ā
JVL
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Denmark
seen from Russia
seen from Iraq
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Algeria
seen from United States
seen from TĆ¼rkiye
seen from Malaysia
seen from Sweden
seen from Barbados
seen from TĆ¼rkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Romania
seen from Barbados
seen from United States
@theclassicistblog
Hi, if I just started following you and youāre trying to figure out if Iām a bot or not: Iām not. If you came here bc communities currently only allow you to use your main there: I use @aristoteliancomplacency for everything other than Artist Stuffā¢ now and havenāt done any Artist Stuff in a long while. One day.
Data Weave
Kickstarter from @notendo to make high quality woven textile garments with digital abstraction based on digital files:
Data Weave continues work I began in 2001 that reimagines contemporary digital culture through textile arts to create a continuum of traditional and modern art forms and technologies. Applying my process of color encoding binary data to textiles expands fiber art traditions and addresses current preservation challenges faced by digital media.
ā¦ Data Weave is a marriage of art forms to the extent that the Jacquard loomās use of punch cards to weave intricate motifs inspired the use of punch cards for saving and executing programs in early computing. Data Weave extends traditions of embedding symbols in textiles to communicate information by applying my practice of color coding binaries to weaving. This process of encoding data with color produces intricately detailed, cascading motifs that are meant to be woven pixel to stitch. Each pixel represents bits of data showing how weaving can also be understood as pixel art. Furthermore, Data Weave simultaneously illustrates an alternate way of data preservation and a materialization of digital ephemera by tangibly elucidating data structures with color.Ā
More Here
https://www.instagram.com/p/BXBVDG2Bum7/
ā¦thatās ingenious.
The city artist is ready. The invitation to color your feelings about your home town is extended to all the citizens.
And yes that is the layout of the Hamina city centre. The famed circular grid with city hall in the middle.
Booklet of embroidery and drawnwork (early 17th century). Probably Portugese. Linen, silk, leather, paper.
Images and text courtesy The Met.
Another Platonic solid. So much time and effort for something fairly unimpressive. Disheartening. This one at least has neater seams, but nylon thread would probably be neater still.
Potential solutions to the spiralling granny square problem (forgive the clumsy middle-of-the-row joins, I normally join in the corner, but I wanted to make sure that corner-joins weren't affecting what I was trying): As crocheters will know, any granny square of sufficient size will start to develop a spiral. How quickly it develops will vary based on tension and the particular signature of an individual crocheter, but the spiral is inevitable because of the fact that crochet stitches lean to the left. You can see it starting to develop on the top left square, most notably along the left side edge. One common solution is simply to turn the work after every round - that's what's happening in the top right square. Note the distinct absence of a spiral forming. The "problem" with this solution is that every other row has the "wrong side" of the stitch facing. But some might not consider this a problem at all - after all, this is what happens anyway when you're working rows rather than rounds. It will look best if you make sure you finish with a right side row, though, because working like this essentially creates a two-row repeat. So if your square has an odd number of rounds, this might bother you more. Another common solution is to block the work. Personally, I'm not a fan of blocking because the results vary so much based on what yarn you're using (the higher the natural fiber content, the better standard blocking will work. You can steam block fairly well for acrylic yarns). But blocking is always only a temporary solution: as soon as you wash the piece you have to repeat the blocking process. The solution I'm experimenting with now is the bottom one in the photo. A while ago I discovered that a friend of mine crochets wrapping the yarn what most would consider "the wrong way" (if it works for you, who cares?) I.e she wraps the yarn clockwise around the hook, whereas most people wrap anticlockwise (or counterclockwise). This means that both the right and the wrong side of the stitch look different to a piece producing the more common way, because it's not a total inversion of the common method - you're still inserting the hook from the front to the back of the stitch you're working into. However, if you totally invert the technique: wrap clockwise -and- insert the hook from the back to the front of the stitch, what you essentially produce is a right-side row, worked from the back, with the stitches slanting to the right. This solves the "wrong side row" problem and still gives you stitches that slant the other way to balance out the spiral problem. Interestingly, working this way seems to accentuate the spiral happening in each individual row/round, but still gives you a non-spiralling square. Problems with this technique: you're essentially learning a new stitch, and because you're wrapping the yarn a different way you're actually changing the amount of yarn involved in each yarn over. This means you're not only learning a new stitch, but have to hold your hook in a different way to try and adjust the length of yarn involved in a yarn over to match that of your normal stitches. Another problem: it makes the first stitch you work into after a corner really small and tight, and a bit of a fiddle to work into. As of yet, I don't know if the individual spiralling of each round would become less obvious if I was more practiced at the stitch. Another note: once you've worked the initial yarn over clockwise, inserted the hook the wrong way and pulled the loop through the stitch with a clockwise wrap, you can revert to the normal anticlockwise yarn overs for the rest of the stitch, and it'll still look good. This will help reduce some of the tension issues in constructing the stitch, but not that created by the initial yarn over. I have a few more ideas I haven't seen elsewhere that I still want to try, but I got impatient because I wanted to start another project (a crocheted Ancient Greek pithos) and I wanted to try out the ideas I had for that before I forgot them. The problem with experimentation is patience, and I don't always have it.
Ramen is already awesomely delicious, but Singapore-based artist Cynthia Delaney Suwitoās Knitting Noodles project elevates delicious noodles into edible art. She took an āinstantā food and put it to use in a way that requires she be patient and careful, which in turn urges the viewer to slow down as they watch the methodical noodle knitting process:
[via Thatās Nerdalicious!]
Tfw another artist beats you physically manifesting an idea, and it's the best of both worlds because now the thing actually exists and you didn't have to do the making :D
Die Nase.
Iāve been writing fragmentary bits of pattern for a crochet face for years now, and finally put hook to yarn and made a prototype nose today.
Here are my āpatternā notes, which also function well to show why I donāt write patterns:
Dec, Dec, inc, inc, Dec Dec Inc inc Plain x 3 Inc inc Plain x3 Sl, ch2, dc2tog, ch2, sl Dc flt Sc3tog
The next challenges are figuring out eyes and lips, and then, of course, integrating them into one pattern. (Eye holes are easy enough, but sculpting the curves of eyelids a little harder).
Ooh, I like this! Mind if I give your āpatternā a try?
Go for it! :3
(Errata: dc flt = sc flo. Okay, part of that typo was autocorrect, but I canāt explain the t=o part.)
Hereās my shot at it! Naturally I chose dark gray yarn, which doesnāt photograph for crap. It looks quite decently nose-like, but you may have to take my word for that.
When making the nostrils, how many of the previous rowās stitches did you skip when connecting the ch2? I tried a couple different options, it appears to be two? When youāre working the Sc flo, does that become the right or wrong side of the work? I photographed this with it becoming the wrong side, but Iām not sure that it makes much of a difference.
I think I can write out the pattern in more detail and/or chart it if that becomes a useful thing at some point. Iām not much good at creating new patterns, but I enjoy the challenge of wrestling ideas into words.
Iām intrigued by this idea overall. The possibilities for sculpted, soft masks are endless.
Bonus: My scrap yarn had a knot in just the right place to become snot. I am a mature adult and did not laugh about this at all.
:D nice!
Yes, it was 2 stitches I missed, and: the missed out loop should be on the back of the work, if that makes sense.
Die Nase.
Iāve been writing fragmentary bits of pattern for a crochet face for years now, and finally put hook to yarn and made a prototype nose today.
Here are my āpatternā notes, which also function well to show why I donāt write patterns:
Dec, Dec, inc, inc, Dec Dec Inc inc Plain x 3 Inc inc Plain x3 Sl, ch2, dc2tog, ch2, sl Dc flt Sc3tog
The next challenges are figuring out eyes and lips, and then, of course, integrating them into one pattern. (Eye holes are easy enough, but sculpting the curves of eyelids a little harder).
Ooh, I like this! Mind if I give your āpatternā a try?
Go for it! :3
(Errata: dc flt = sc flo. Okay, part of that typo was autocorrect, but I can't explain the t=o part.)
Die Nase. I've been writing fragmentary bits of pattern for a crochet face for years now, and finally put hook to yarn and made a prototype nose today. Here are my "pattern" notes, which also function well to show why I don't write patterns: Dec, Dec, inc, inc, Dec Dec Inc inc Plain x 3 Inc inc Plain x3 Sl, ch2, dc2tog, ch2, sl Dc flt Sc3tog The next challenges are figuring out eyes and lips, and then, of course, integrating them into one pattern. (Eye holes are easy enough, but sculpting the curves of eyelids a little harder).
Timaeus 1: tetrahedron prototype.
Iām the kind of person whoās too impatient to wait for there to be good daylight and make sure thereās no crap in the background for me to take photos and post them, so here are some photos taken at night, under artificial light, with some bags in the background (my office is my studio is my lounge. Mess is inevitable).
Anyway, somewhat delightfully ironic to call this a prototype, since prototype can mean both the first thing you make which you then go on to perfect, or the thing from which all future models are derived: almost like a platonic form. The form which is to be perfected in future models and the perfect form from which all later (imperfect) models will be derived are represented by the same word.
Why is that ironic? Because a tetrahedron is one of five Platonic solids (tetrahedron, hexahedron [more commonly known as a cube], octohedron, dodecahedron, icosahedron): it's a platonic form. It's the prototype for all tetrahedrons. Except I'm hoping that the next ones I make will be more perfect that this. My prototype/Platonic form is imperfect and rough. But it is still the first manifestation of the basic concept from which all the others will be built.
I will (hopefully) explain more about the Timaeus (A Platonic dialogue where these solids are mentioned) as I make more and expand/explore/refine.
I wish my WIP photos were more interesting/aesthetic/intriguing, but hey. As long as the finished pieces have those qualities I won't complain too much.
I've also been playing with wire crochet again.
Things I'm working on at the moment: a giant hyperbolic mass, in super bulky/chunky yarn. This is 12 balls in. (It takes about 40 minutes to get through one ball). And some geometric crochet - beginning with a simple series of Platonic Solids. Currently layering and layering fabric stiffener onto one triangle for the tetrahedron to see how many coats it's going to take to get a sturdy enough facet.
Book 1 & 2 exhibited together at the Beyond the Borders festival.
I'm running a workshop (co-designed with colleague, who is a star and also did most of the prep whilst I was busy talking about the Stitched Iliad at UCL's Homeric Summer School) this weekend at the festival as well. I'll post photos from that later.
This afternoon I am giving a talk at UCL about the Stitched Iliad. It is open to the public, if you happen to be in London at around 4.00pm
