Apple claims that AirPods are building a “wireless future.” Many people think they're a symbol of disposable wealth. The truth is bleaker.
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Mike Driver
Cosmic Funnies
almost home
Acquired Stardust

Discoholic 🪩

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

JVL
Misplaced Lens Cap

No title available

ellievsbear
Show & Tell
Today's Document
Stranger Things

Andulka
ojovivo
styofa doing anything
taylor price

izzy's playlists!
Claire Keane
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from India

seen from United States
seen from Poland

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye

seen from Indonesia
seen from United Kingdom
@thevampdisaster
Apple claims that AirPods are building a “wireless future.” Many people think they're a symbol of disposable wealth. The truth is bleaker.
Fiona: Say the first word that comes to your head
Baz: Alright
Fiona: Simon
Baz: Gorgeous- fuck I meant horrendous. I MEANT TO SAY HORRENDOUS!
Fiona: …
Kaladin, A2
THIS FELT SO WRONG TO DRAW I HOPE U KNOW
diagram of me succumbing to the grain
“Colorism isn’t real.”
Colorism? Wow because the term “racism” is so blase.
pilambdaod Colorism specifically refers to people of their own race valuing lighter skin over darker skin. For example in latina culture, valuing “good” straight hair over “pelo malo” or bad, curly hair.
Racism would imply we’re talking about at least two different races here; colorism specifically is about racist ideals within one race, people of one race policing others appearance within their own race.
(since this is an indian book, presumably made by indian people for indian children to read, depicting a light skinned indian woman as more beautiful than a dark skinned one, it’s colorism.)
One of those is clearly Caucasian the other Indian.
Creating random new “isms” only makes legitimate grievances seem petty and stupid.
“One of those is clearly Caucasian”
Aishwarya Rai, Kareena Kapoor, Kangana Ranaut
Karisma Kapoor, Shruti Haasan, Zarine Khan
All actresses/models born in India to parents who were also born in India (or Pakistan), in a narrow view of “race.”
If a Papua New Guinean hooks up with a Swedish person all you get is a human. There’s no new thing you’re going to get. You just get a human.
- Bill Nye: Race is a Human Construct (and don’t look at the comments; it’s the usual cesspool of bigots)
Ideas on “race” have been in slow development over the years, but colourism is a real thing (often with roots in imperialism, especially as Western ideas of beauty began to intrude upon countries).
The 100 Years of Beauty: Philippines has a jarring jump where April Villanueva (who has light/medium-toned skin) gets her skin darkened for the 1910s-20s aesthetic, then becomes powder-white when US/European colonial interests make a stronger influence on Philippine society in the 1930s (more in the research video).
Two more examples of skin tone variation between famous women in countries where colourism has become prevalent in celebrity culture (ie, it was a lot harder finding photos of a dark-skinned Korean actress than a light-skinned one):
Koreans: Song Hye-kyo and Lee Hyori
Filipinos: Valerie Garica and Nicole Scherzinger (active in the US; Filipino father, Hawaiian/Samoan-Russian mother)
Variation in skin colour across a “race” is as real as variation in eye colour (”oh, you have brown eyes? I guess you’re not a real Caucasian”).
Colourism also pervades a lot of modern beauty marketing.
What’s underneath your dark skin? A prettier, lighter version of yourself! Everyone should strive to be more fair and lovely because only then you’ll be happy with your flesh prison!!
tl;dr colourism exists and isn’t some bogeyman made up by “”es jay double-ews,”” and if you’re the person bemoaning how it “delegitimizes racism” then it’s likely you actually don’t care about racism at all and are just trying to devalue the arguments with the classic “but so-and-so people have it worse! how could you be so self-centered and selfish??”
Scott Pilgrim vs. The World Thanos
They better have Michael Cera kill Thanos
@abouttwocats dude……
I love contrasting designs… Demons wearing white clothes……….. Angels wearing black clothes…………………… A demon so beautiful they are mistaken for an angel; an angel so monstrous they are mistaken for a demon.
Reginald when asked which his favorite child is:
shoutout to the time my mom was hammered and i heard her trying to tell my dad that she murdered her first husband years ago and my dad very patiently said “i saw glenn in an elevator last week”
don’t be afraid to get bioluminescent this year
i just realized this post would have been marginally funnier if i said “this summer” instead of “this year” because i like the nonsensical implied connection between summer and the ability to chemically fluoresce. sorry everyone i let you down
Fandom:
Adults: *create a space for other adults*
Minors*: *come into that space*
Minors: this isn’t a safe space for kids!!
Adults: …..uhh no, it’s not.
Minors: why are you personally attacking me personally?
Adults: ….????????…………
Minors: I know you want to fuck children
Me: *looks at fic with one character that’s in his 40′s and another that’s in his 50′s, with no children in sight*
Me: ………please get out of my house
(I still get a lot of responses to this post calling me a pedo and I am t i r e d of this bottom-of-the-barrel quality discourse)
* this obviously doesn’t apply to all minors, and to all those minors (like me, when I was your age!) that manage to enjoy and participate in fandom without calling everyone a pedophile, I appreciate you.
Adults: we want to write/draw porn of these fictional adult characters.
Minors: that’s not appropriate for children.
Adults: yep! that’s why it’s tagged as explicit and has a warning for mature content and also is tagged for various sex acts in case you’re not into that.
Minors: that type of content makes me uncomfortable.
Adults: we totally get that but that’s why the tags and warnings are on it.
Adults: look you even have to agree:
This work could have adult content. If you proceed you have agreed that you are willing to see such content.
Adults: so if you’re not into that type of thing then you can just skip over it.
Minors: it make me uncomfortable.
Adults: ……then… don’t… read it?
Minors: no.
Minors: you should stop writing it.
Adults: no.
JUST FUCKING SAYING
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. If you’re old enough to be using the internet unsupervised, then you’re old enough to be learn how to avoid content that upsets you. Adult fans and content creators are not here to be your babysitters.
one thing is always true in my many years of experience of being in a fandom : if you don’t like something, just exit the page. it’s that easy. there’s a back button for you to use, not an “attack” button for you to personally insult the author
you can’t blame others for the consequences of mistakes you made yourself. if you still go into the page despite the clear tags and warnings, then it’s not the content creator’s responsibility to take care of your feelings
fandom is really a sandbox. up till now, i was a minor for most of my time in a fandom. i have seen lots of things i did not want to see. that’s why i now blacklist those tags on tumblr. AO3 saviour is also a good friend for you.
i do not blame anyone. because there are many different people and kinks in a fandom, not everything is made with you in mind as as targeted audience
(i do report the pedophiles when possible, though)
He was a trans man you fucking freaks
Imagine hating trans men so much that you read the history of someone who presented as a man for so long that most people only discovered he was ~biologically female~ after his fucking autopsy and be like “well clearly he was just gender fluid” I’m fucking
he specifically asked to be buried in the clothes he died in!!!!! we only know he was trans bc someone disrespected his direct wishes after his death!!!!!!
Apollo: Sister, what are you the goddess of?
Artemis: *lounging by a spring on piles of deerskin surrounded by three dozen naked girls with a dead pan expression* Virginity.
“Heracles, they’re lesbians”.
Note that the concept of “virginity” in Ancient times merely meant “unmarried”, and had nothing to do with sexual activity. Some priestesses were “virgins” because they chose (or were committed to) a life of worship, but it was merely a question of social status, not of personal choice or practice. Of course, one can suppose that this lifestyle would be rather attractive for lesbians. So when Artemis is said to be the Goddess of Virgins, it is meant to be understood as “Goddess of Unmarried Women”, or, quite possibly literally, of lesbians. (It’s only Christianity that reframed the concept of virginity to mean “never had sex”. Many ancient religions has “Virgin goddesses”, which symbolized feminine power, and in this case too it meant “untied to a man”, or “whole for herself”)
ok but also consider :