Down time.
Dear driver of the car that brought me to the ground,
I admit it, I spat. And that spit hit your windshield. It was not my intention that it hit your windshield. In the milliseconds I had to act in defiance of your decision to take away my right to the road, I spat. I spat because I felt, in those moments, powerless and without any ability to express my disgust. In those fractional beats of a response, I had no time to remove my hand from the handlebar, where I was holding the brakes to avoid hitting you, and give you the V-sign or the wank-sign, both of which are known to me, both of which are almost unconscious responses to an act like yours. I had priority in the road, and you were meant to give way; the road narrows to enter a short tunnel beneath a bridge, and this bridge ain’t big enough for the both of us. You’re meant to give priority by slowing, stopping if necessary. You’re meant to assess that there is no oncoming traffic, pedestrians, cyclists, horses. Some of us occupy a position slightly out of your view, which is why you’re meant to stop at the line which instructs you to stop. It says you have no priority over things coming toward the bridge from the other side. I was. I was on the centre-edge of the left lane, taking the priority position that I have in that situation. You took that from me with speed, acceleration and oncoming fury. I had to brake and dodge you, and I wanted to express my frustration in an act of revolt. It was disenfranchising. It was abject despair. It was powerlessness. It was vulnerability. I cannot argue or oppose your decision without giving up my safety - to do so makes no sense. I am nothing, a particle of no impression, I mean nothing to you, you did not tolerate my position nor my right to be there. My legal right, yes, but I mean the simple right I have to share space with you. You did not want that and you pushed through. I spat. I spat at the road you were about to fill. Your speed put you further into the path of that little ball of saliva that I’d anticipated. I am no crack shot, no hawkeye, no physicist. As Han Solo said, it was one in a million. I did not know it had hit your vehicle. I would never have known. Unless:
You came after me. Which you did. Unknown to me, as I stretched back out from the momentary adrenal surge that accompanies such moments as having one’s road position threatened, however briefly, you had stopped immediately and turned your vehicle around. You must have done this so quickly, so ruthlessly.. with so much rage. That someone had defied you with a small ball of moisture. That your windscreen was sullied by a damp spittle that could not be removed. That your honour had been called into question? By now I was a few hundred metres along the road. It widens out alongside some houses. I was unaware. That you had accelerated, again, to my disadvantage. That you were thoroughly intent on this pursuit, which I knew nothing of, and had no chance to consider. Because you caught me. Before I knew from where you came, or who you were, or that your windscreen carried my evaporating spittle, you were on me. You pulled immediately into me, sideswiping me. The rear left portion of your car was pushing me sideways toward the curb. In this moment I realised I was about to fall. The world always turns white when you’re about to crash. Your eyes dart for the horizon. The only intent in your being is to resist the fall. When something as alien as a vehicle touches you, compressing you, restricting every freedom that you have, driven by a human so intent on violence, you lose all sense of understanding. Physics takes over. You pushed until I fell, and I lost my balance, my bicycle, and landed hard on the concrete. My bicycle careered into the verge outside someone’s house. And you skidded to a stop. This took four or five seconds.
I calculate what is happening. At first I think you must have been avoiding a car coming in the other direction. I think that maybe someone else is involved. A man shouts if I am alright from behind, having just left his house. His wife is nearby. I am on my back. A banana smell, crushed underneath me. A pang. Blood running along my forearm. I am conscious and sore, but nothing is broken. You always know when something doesn’t work. My arse is evil ache. My eyes dart for the horizon. On it is you.
You are perhaps four or five years older than me. You wear a gilet. You are a human being, I note for the first time. You do not look sorry. Why aren’t you sorry, I wonder? And then the tirade comes. You aren’t sorry. You are angry. You begin to accuse me of something, and you tell me to get up. I do get up, which hurts. There is a girl there next to you, about eight. She’s your daughter, I realise. You demand that I atone for something. “You know who I am”, you yell. I really, really did not. You shout something about spitting. You say “my daughter saw you spit on my car”. I look at her. She is crying. I think she is crying because her Dad is yelling. Or maybe because I am bleeding, and that it is your fault. Or perhaps because she sometimes spits, and worries that an act of random violence is the price one pays for it. “You ran me over” I say, understanding slowly what is happening. I spat. You came back to hurt me.
“I didn’t run you over” you say. “I came to stop you”. Stop me.
Others intervene. Can you call the Police, I ask one. Another says I can have a cup of tea, which I politely refuse. So so English. They call the police. You continue to shout at me. Your daughter is wailing, so you tell her to sit in the car. I hear you reinforcing her story for when the police come. I speak to a policeman and he asks me to explain what has happened. I tell him that a man has run me down, into the ground, and I am sore but otherwise alright. He asks to speak to you. You are still busy squaring the story with your inconsolable daughter. I tell the policeman this, and it enrages you some more. My adrenaline has subsided. Internal urges to hurt you have subsided. Revenge, which never escalates for me into anything physical or actual, is now out of my mind. It’s the first time I realise that I wouldn’t do what you’ve just done. You’re on the phone to the police, telling them about my spit. You told them I shouldn’t have been in the middle of the road, earlier on. I thought about going and seeing if there was spit on the windscreen. And then I rationalized that this is in no way about spit or about road positions. It is about the moment where you had a choice to act, and that act caused me harm. The act you were referring to deprived me of a sap of moisture and allowed me a moment to feel like I had a right to protest. Your act involved the rapid movement of a heavy, metal object which contained your young, terrified daughter, into another human being who had nothing to protect him, nor a warning, nor a rationale. I did what I did, and you did that. You did not stop yourself doing that. You engaged with it. You were fuelled by it. A windscreen wiper and an angry comment would have removed both the spittle and the sense of the act. You could have chosen to feel like I was an arsehole, a human being who has no sense of respect. You could have complained about me to your daughter and wife, your friends and family. You could comment on articles about cyclists, decry us as a menace. You could have said ‘these things happen’. You could have been calm. You could have breathed. Your thoughts could have been gentle and above my own act of respite. You wanted more. You neglected everything we are taught.
I was taught not to spit. My mother would be shocked that I spat in disgust. She hates spitting. I hate it when kids on the street do it. When footballers do it. When I cycle, I am an essential fountain of snot and spit. I do it relentlessly. I spit out dead flies, bits of nuts and dates, I spit in protest or sometimes because I drank some dairy. I was also taught not to harm others. It is the foundation of my childhood, as it was yours, and is probably what you teach your child, in stories and morality, if not in actuality. Spitting is uncouth. It does no harm, but I understand how it is a provocation. Someone disapproves of you. Someone expresses their distaste, their lack of respect for your decision making. Note, I did not spit at you when you had felled me. I did not make a threat, I did not offer a response to what ascends to so much more than a provocation. You harmed me. You did it because you wanted it. And you stayed at the scene waiting for the police because you needed to rationalise it.
Until that moment, I thought you were waiting because you were worried about the consequences of this action. But you did not appear fearful of reprisal. It took me about ten minutes of being here, on this vacant, quiet Surrey road to realise that you were here still because you needed to believe that the status quo had returned to equilibrium. The rationalists theorised that nature is a violent place, where humans are engaged in a constant battle with elements, with themselves, with dangers and urges and actions beyond control. They said that social contracts were our way of remaining balanced, able to work with and around each other. Even if, this morning, the law hadn’t forbidden you to threaten a vulnerable road user’s right of way, and then attack a vulnerable road user immediately after, then your sense of innate moral obligation would have stayed your hand (and accelerator). It did not. You were, in this moment, coming to terms with the worst of realisations; you are a bad person. You cannot remain faithful to the contract you have with others, and you cannot stop yourself from using your power and superior force to subjugate, and damage, a weaker individual. That’s not good. That is the very definition of an egregious, self-centred and amoral act. I spat. I took a standpoint. I declared that I did not like being threatened. I rebelled. I said no. You did not like being told “no”. And you wanted to right a perceived wrong. And, like I have said, you could not prevent it happening. That is not good. Not good at all.
I like to think I am invincible. I think I am protected. I do assert myself of the rights to which I am entitled as a person on a bicycle. I think that, mostly, rules are accepted and followed. You told me that you are a cyclist. I said I didn’t care. It has no bearing on this. You said that it does; because you understand cyclists. You accused me of cunning. You said that I was making it seem like you’d done this on purpose. You did do this on purpose, I remind you. I am sat down on the floor. You tower above me. You like to retain authority where you have none. I tell you I respect you for staying. You say you have nothing to fear. I know this. I know that the witnesses are indifferent. That one had said “these things happen” and that the “roads can be dangerous”. I reject her assessment like I reject her cup of tea: politely. I know I won’t press charges because it’s not worth time or effort. I am damaged a little, my bike is more or less fine. A dangerous human being will be on the road at the end of this, whether I like it or not. At worst you would have a caution or a few points for dangerous driving. At worst. In this moment I choose a new path. I ask you questions.
Are you here to try and square this with yourself? You tell me again that you are a cyclist. That there is spit on the windscreen. That I am a menace. That I give cyclists a bad name. You do not answer this question. You make excuses. You refer to past events, nothing I know of, people who can attest to your decency. I speculate that you are trying to achieve a rational status quo. I say this to you. You tell me that you didn’t do anything wrong. That you were only trying to “stop me”.
You did stop me, I say. You knocked me onto the ground. You achieved that. You did not call the police, pull alongside me and demand that I stop, just ask me to stop, pull in a hundred metres in front of me and shout at me to stop. And even if you had, and I hadn’t stopped, you would have been in no way legitimised to harm me. You did not simply drive on. You did not ignore it. You turned around. You got angry and this happened. Are you okay with that, I asked you. Are you okay with that series of decisions?
“It was a rush of blood to the head” you say. Coldplay? COLDPLAY? Now I realise how lost you are. You tell me again you are a cyclist, I’m a menace, you’re a good person. “You think I’m stupid don’t you?” you ask. I say no. My head’s in between my legs. No, no no. I don’t even think that what you did is stupid. I think it was, in that moment, absolutely intentional, the result of a series of illogical decisions made by an irrational human being. I think you’re probably an intelligent person. You probably act decently. But this is what you are capable of, I tell you. This is your nadir. This is what you are, when the core is exposed. I tell you my name, you tell me yours. You offer your hand and I say no. I don’t want to shake hands with you. That is conciliatory. You are my enemy. You are an enemy of the way that people do business with each other. If you spat on my bike, I wouldn’t take a hammer to your leg. I would not. When you harmed me, I did not act harmful toward you. I realise that I am not that and I am not like you. I tell you that, too. You say you are not a bad person. The police come.
The police officer is kind. She asks how I am. “Sad”, I tell her. Watch where you spit, she says. I smile. “Perhaps that guy needs to watch where he puts his car”, I say. She asks if I want this to go to court. I tell her no: it’s not worth time and effort, and it’s not worth trying to punish someone according to a set of laws that aren’t so good at protecting me. When the shit hits the fan (when the spit hits the window) then here is a person who disregards all avenues of morality, control and rationality; the law doesn’t matter. He may well think he operates within the the law, but he does not. “What do you want to do about it” she asks. “Give him a bollocking” I ask. She says she will talk to you. I am sure you will be given a token warning.
She says I seem really sad, not angry, and that’s unusual in these instances. “I have more to be sad about,” I tell her “than angry.” She smiles, wishes me luck, and says I can head off. I do.
I head past you and nod in exchange. This is not an acknowledgement. This is not a conciliatory gesture. You go to your conscience and I go to mine. I cycle for three more hours, sore; sore, mentally, sore in my physical. I need to process this and think about you some more. You are not free of this. You did something that you might process and might work out, might reconcile with your moral compass, might fit within your spheres of action and codes of being. But here is a man who knows you at your very worst. You know it, too. And worse than that, the people closest to you - like your daughter - know it. She knows that you will do harm when you are questioned or confronted. She knows what you will do. She knows you discriminate, that you accuse, make excuses for terrible actions. She will be worried, scared perhaps. She might think I am bad because I spat at her father’s window. It’s questionable, for sure. I’m not proud of that. But I am proud of every single thing I did immediately after. I don’t think you can say the same.
If you ever see this, then thank you for reading. I am not sorry to have defied you. I am not sorry that I spat at you and your actions. I am sorry that I exposed you to yourself and to your kin. But I am glad that you know what I know. I hope you become better. You need to be better than this.










