Drugs make better music
Don’t do drugs. Or at least, that’s what society has taught us from a young age. I remember signing my name on a Red Ribbon Week certificate stating “I pledge to be, drug free.” But, with my Twitter feed blowing up with images of prominent artists,
like Rihanna
and 2 Chainz,
celebrating 420, I started to wonder about the effects of drugs on music. Are drugs as harmful as my fourth grade teacher portrayed them? Or are they a source of inspiration for artists across all musical genres?
We all know drugs, such as LSD, “Shrooms,” and Marijuana, are illegal. However, is it ethically immoral for artists to produce music while under its influence?
I say, no.
Most of my favorite albums, like Carlos Santana’s Moonflower, The Beatles’ Magical Mystery Tour, Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band and Sublime from Sublime, were heavily influenced by drugs. Santana even said that “You can’t take LSD and not find your voice.”
Now, I'm not saying that everyone should hang out with Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds. But I’m saying that artists who choose to partake in the psychedelic realm also produce some of the most iconic and soul-enriching music ever. Coincidence? Maybe. Maybe not.
Either way, I want to know what you think.
Is it ethically wrong or right for artists to take drugs for artistic inspiration?












