
祝日 / Permanent Vacation

Origami Around

Kiana Khansmith

Love Begins
we're not kids anymore.

izzy's playlists!
art blog(derogatory)
RMH
trying on a metaphor
Not today Justin
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
AnasAbdin

JBB: An Artblog!
Keni
Jules of Nature
Sade Olutola
DEAR READER

ellievsbear

roma★

#extradirty

seen from Malaysia

seen from China

seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Iraq

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Iraq

seen from Indonesia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Iraq
@thumperman999999
https://x.com/dominalizapromo
Domina Liza
A HANDY CHART FOR THOSE OF YOU WONDERING WHAT THE FUCK IS UP WITH THESE. NOTE THAT THESE ARE ALL THE INFORMAL AND YOU IS THE FORMAL SO LIKE YOU WOULD ALWAYS ADDRESS YOUR SUPERIOR/ OLDER PERSON/ SOCIAL BETTER WITH YOU BUT WITH YOUR BUDS YOU CAN USE THESE.
Cool. Sit on my face like that!
Body Beautiful 🔥🔥😍
Overlock Stitch by @clothes_reetzy
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT WE DISAGREE POLITICALLY BECAUSE WE DISAGREE BIBLICALLY?
Most political disagreements are not actually political at their core. They are biblical.
Politics is often just the visible manifestation of deeper beliefs about God, truth, morality, justice, identity, authority, human nature, freedom, and the purpose of society. In other words, we often disagree politically because we first disagree biblically. If two people fundamentally disagree about what Scripture teaches regarding life, truth, sin, justice, sexuality, family, authority, personal responsibility, compassion, morality, or the role of government, they will almost inevitably arrive at different political conclusions.
For example:
If one person believes truth is absolute and established by God, while another believes truth is fluid and self-defined, their politics will eventually reflect those beliefs. If one person believes human beings are sinful by nature and in need of redemption, while another believes humanity is basically good and only corrupted by systems, their political worldview will develop very differently.
If one person believes children belong ultimately to God and parents carry divine responsibility, while another believes the state should increasingly shape identity and morality, political conflict is unavoidable. If one person believes biblical morality is timeless, while another believes morality evolves with culture, they may eventually vote in completely opposite directions. If one person believes freedom requires moral restraint and accountability to God, while another believes freedom means autonomy without restraint, their vision for society will never fully align.
These worldview differences eventually affect real cultural issues such as abortion, marriage, sexuality, parental rights, religious liberty, the sanctity of life, the definition of justice, and the role of government in society. These are not merely political debates. They are theological debates wearing political clothing.
The political battlefield is often downstream from the theological battlefield. At its deepest level, this is not merely Republican versus Democrat, conservative versus progressive, or right versus left. It is a conflict of worldviews. A conflict over truth, morality, identity, freedom, justice, authority, and ultimately the purpose of human life itself.
The danger for the Church is when believers become more politically shaped than biblically formed. The answer is not blind loyalty to a political movement. Nor is it disengagement from culture.
The answer is the restoration of a thoroughly biblical worldview. Because when Scripture ceases to be the foundation, culture will fill the vacuum. And eventually, politics will reflect whatever theology prevails. Or whatever theology disappears.
Dr. Scott Reece