i hate venomqueer, of course saying that is gonna get you banned dude
i have zero empathy and i do NOT fucking care about anything outside of what happens to MYSELF. but, i have the basic decency to understand non-consensual harm is BAD? are you fucking serious!!!! you can’t just call everyone ableist when you get called out for being a bad person. dude.
even if you don’t feel anything for others, you at least have to understand saying you are neutral on events that horrifically traumatize people is INSANE.
i wasn't going to comment on this further, but i do want to make a final statement on this.
of course saying that is gonna get you banned dude
i'm unsure of why being banned was such a big deal for hiim, to the point where hee had to vague & directly post many times about it, and accuse myself and others of ableism. it was a very poor way to handle being banned from a server ... and frankly, if hee felt that hiis post was misread, hee could've reached out instead of accusing the mod team of ableism. it was very clearly no one's intention to be ableist, and while it is unfortunate hee felt hurt or misunderstood, that isn't really an excuse to make multiple emotionally charged posts (both direct & indirect) when hee has such a large following in this community — which has led to harassment of myself and others, and i've even seen someone wishing to harm / wishing death on the radyume mods.
you can’t just call everyone ableist when you get called out for being a bad person. dude.
i feel it's rather unfortunate hee has to resort to calling others ableist after being called out for something ... when hee could've just taken down the post, apologized, or even just clarified what hee meant further, if we had misunderstood hiis original intentions? (which i am still unsure of, because hee handled it rather ... immaturely, and as far as i know, made little statement beyond "you guys just hate it when cluster b's show symptoms of their disorders!")
even if you don’t feel anything for others, you at least have to understand saying you are neutral on events that horrifically traumatize people is INSANE.
agreed, anon. some people have disagreed with me on this, but i do not think being "neutral" is an acceptable stance when it comes to things like child exploitation, and exploitation in general. you should not be neutral on predators preying on and harming others, regardless of your ability to feel cognitive empathy. it is one thing to be unable to care or empathize, it is another to be "neutral" on predators. being neutral means you're not against it, and frankly, i think being strictly against it is the only acceptable stance in this case.
i appreciate your ask — anonymous or not, it's nice to know i have people in my corner. i've unfortunately been receiving some harassment due to this, hence why i'm stepping back for the most part.
