Twinker, Tailor (The Toyboy Trend of Male Designers by Reza Ghahremanzadeh)
Designers have, from time immemorial, stressed the importance of accessories and how to utilise them effectively. And it would appear that the favourite accessory of the gay designer is the vapid twink on his arm. Allowing a designer to shape and construct the clothes on your back is one thing, but allowing them to shape and construct your identity and purpose is unforgivable.
I certainly believe that chicken queen designers should be called out for their shallowness and for their propensity to treat young lovers the same way they treat garments and trends: to be used and disposed of as they see fit. With that being said, old piggish men have been around since the beginning of time and they will continue to exist right up until the sun engulfs our planet. Therefore, the onus is really on these younger men to harness some dignity and self-respect and to realise that being a designer's temporary real-life mannequin is a waste of precious time.
When I look at photos of Calvin Klein and his ex partner Nick Gruber, or photos of Marc Jacobs and his former porn star beau Harry Louis, it truly makes me cringe. Why are these designers so intimidated or repulsed by the notion of a relationship with an age-appropriate partner? Is it that they enjoy the power that comes with being the dominant partner in a relationship? Has a lifetime in the world of fashion completely distorted their perceptions of beauty? I find it interesting that a great number of these designers boast about being able to deal with jet lag, deadlines, fashion events, major marketing campaigns, etc. But the fact that they clearly can't cope with the notion of being in a relationship with an intelligent, older man who can voice his opinions and isn't easily manipulated makes them nothing more than a bunch of vain, hairy-arsed Peter Pans.
In the introduction, I referred to these toyboys as "vapid twinks." And I think that's an accurate description for many of them. The majority of them probably have very little talent and ambition and are quite happy to ride on the coattails (or, in this case, the haute couture gowns) of their famous lovers. However, I would assume that some of them do possess a fair degree of talent, intelligence and ambition, and that they're essentially using the relationship in order to climb the career ladder. But even if this is the case, leveraging sex for professional gain is never a good idea. Your pride and dignity are paramount. They are worth more than any job or any amount of money.
It is time for every toyboy to wake up and smell the coffee. The relationship with your sugar-fashionista-daddy is doomed to fail. And the worst part is that the death of the relationship will affect you way more than it affects them. You will be left sitting alone, paranoid about your fading beauty, feeling like used goods, and panicking about what your next chapter will be. But for the designers, well, it's off to another glamorous, celebrity-laden fashion show in some sparkling cosmopolitan city with their latest pubescent lover in tow.
The world of fashion is like a siren's song: enchanting but treacherous. The physical dangers associated with it are obvious: bulimia, anorexia, drugs, alcohol. But the most dangerous aspect of all is that it encourages us to see and treat people just like trends. But we are not trends. We are not seasonal. Our souls are just like Holly Golightly's little black dress: completely timeless. So to the young gay men who might spot Calvin Klein or Marc Jacobs across the room at some exclusive party, be very careful. All that glitters is not gold.















