What are the statistics of woman’s achievements and the exclusion of it in the media?
Throughout the decades women’s achievements have come to a great extent. From getting a simple right to vote, to the first woman becoming a doctor, to the first women as the secretary of state in the United States. Women’s achievements have become many obstacles, but what happens when the media overlooks such achievements. As of today woman’s statistics show that in television “22% of news stories subjects are women.”, “40% of characters on TV in May 2006 were TV/women, and they were overwhelmingly white” (Ruby 2007). The statistics shown are the portrayal of the media overlooked achievements of women. As it concerns to other forms of media, a pattern of the miss representation of woman’s achievements is presented. According to, (Ruby 2007) In Film, “60% more over 40 leading male actors are hired than over 40 female actors”, “3 female filmmakers, in all of academy award history, have been nominated for best director award (Lina Wertmuller in 1977, Jane Campion in 1994, and Sofia Coppola in 2004), “19% of films released in 2005 employed no women directors, executive producers, producers, writers, cinematographers or editors.” This statistics of the visual media that women are exposed to are evident in the matter that no matter the achievement a women has, the miss representation remains, as well as the prejudice, and favoritism towards men
In Hollywood, another issue of miss representation leans towards the female character attributions and job related aspirations in film and television. In a study by the Geena davits institute on gender in media, a quantitated and qualitative study towards the gender gaps of attributions and job related aspirations in film and television are presented. The study is composed of , “11,927 speaking characters for gender roles across three media: 129 top-grossing family films (G, PG, PG-13) theatrically released between September 2006 and September 2011; 275 prime-time programs across approximately a week of regularly airing series in the Spring of 2012 on 10 broadcast (ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, CW) and cable (Cartoon Network, Disney, Nickelodeon, E!, MTV) channels; and 36 children’s TV shows airing in 2011 across three networks (Disney, Nickelodeon, PBS)” Geena Davis Institute of Gender Gaps (2013). In this subsection of the study, the organization breaks the study down in various careers such as, chief justices, DA’s, CEO’s, High Level Politicians, and editors in chief. The study compares male and females ratios to the industries in the section of family films, and prime time TV shows. According to the Geena Davis Institute of Gender Gaps (2013), “Prime-time is doing a much better job portraying powerful women, with females shown in leadership positions across seven out of eight industries listed in Table 6. Prime-time females are portrayed as 14% of corporate executives, 42.9% of characters with financial clout (e.g., investors, economic officials), 27.8% of high level politicians, 29.6% of doctors/hospital managers/CMOs, 38.5% of academic administrators, 27.3% of media content creators and the only “editor in chief” in journalism.” The statistics of this study show the miss representation of female characters in powerful roles and as career woman
Another industry that is well miss represented in the media is the STEM careers. The lack of women in the field, is also an issue in real life. According to Geena Davis Institute of Gender Gaps (2013) “The n 2009, females held 24% of all STEM jobs in the U.S.” as to the gap in media, “The percentage of STEM females in prime time is just slightly lower than this point statistic (-2.9%), whereas a larger gap exists for family films (-7.7%)” The statistics of this study, and the miss representation and gaps of the female character attributions and job related aspirations in film and television show the reality of the miss representation of women in the media. The overlooked of achievements and actual statistics of women in various industries, portray the statement that the media is giving the wrong view of women’s education and careers. The statement that is made gives the viewers and young girls the wrong statement on the reality of women, and their goals. The fact that if young girls can’t see an empowered career woman, the young girl won’t aspire towards that success. According to the Genna Davis Institute of Gender Gaps, ““If she can see it, she can be it