▞ ▷Lykan ⿻ 🎸 ⫎

traumawillo pack/system of 20+ | they/she | minor | alterhuman | cardboard is yummy

[undercover-werewolf-k1d]

Temporary intro

‎[Plain Text: Temporary intro. End Plain Text.]

𐂯 Collective info

⟡ name : Lykan

⟡ pronouns : she/they

⟡ age : bodily minor

⟡ vivterms : human and canine

⟡ ...

We do not have a DNI list, we block freely :) aand block xenosatanists + pro/neu/complex/anything other than anti-contact for the big 3 and non-consenting paras

‎[Plain Text: we do not have a "do not interact" list, we block freely. and block xenosatanists + pro/neu/complex/anything other than anti-contact for the big 3 and non-consenting paras. End Plain Text.]

[feralcoy]

dropping the therian label because it has become "too watered down!!!" only perpetuates the issue by suggesting that any other identity is more valid/serious but ok

[caniformee]

0143X is really fucking sick of creatures on this site acting as if nobody else with the exception of themselves is allowed to do anything. Next thing you know, beings are going to be accused of trendhopping for something like taking a dump because x random canine on tumblr already shat before so if you ever have eaten and digested food before, you should basically die for being a trend hopper. Thats how you sound. That is how you sound.

0143X is sick of entitled beings acting like infants

[amoonycat]

why can this happen

[sm0k3ythesilly]

“fictionkin used to mean relating to a character but people changed the meaning to being a character!”

SHUT THE FUCK UPPPPPPPPPPPPPP OH MY DAYS

DO YOU’RE FUCKING RESEARCH AND STOP TAKING LABELS THEN CHANGE THE MEANING SO YOU CAN COMPLAIN WHEN PEOPLE USE THEM CORRECTLY

[puppyyyluvvv]

quick reminder that not all therians believe in reincarnation!!

[2pen2wildfire]

parents are allowed to straight-up torture their kids with zero consequences. they can withhold food and water, lock you out of shelter, confiscate your belongings, bar you from human contact, attack and harm you and exert complete control over your physical appearance. and this is just the norm. if you speak out against it you're seen as a delinquent or a predator. even otherwise progressive people get uncomfortable with the idea of dismantling the nuclear family unit because they still see it as the best way to keep kids safe when that simply couldn't be further from the truth. it's evil.

[heyftinally]

This is also part of why I'm so loud about homeschool reform, specifically in the USA.

In the US, there is no meaningful legal definition for educational/academic neglect in any of the 50 states or federally. What this means is that a child can be "homeschooled" and exclusively be taught how to cook and clean, reach the age of 18 being unable to read, write, or count, and this alone is not considered neglect. That 18yo, should they even have the knowledge that suing exists, has no legal grounds to sue their parents for denying them an education.

In over 40 US states, a convicted child abuser can homeschool their children. So someone who has done time for child abuse and somehow regains access to their child(ren) can decide upon returning home that they want to "homeschool" their kids. Those children are now locked in a home with their abuser where nobody can see them.

There are no welfare checks.

There are no routine assessments.

There aren't even databases — state or federal — keeping track of how many homeschooled kids there actually are.

Meaning a child can be locked in their home for their entire life with their convicted abuser, learn absolutely nothing, never go to the doctor, and so long as that child is fed, clothed, and the abuse isn't physical or sexual, that child has almost no chance of rescue and no legal ground to seek restitution if/when they escape.

The only way homeschooled children get rescued is if they're beaten, starved, or physically neglected and they're able to get the right person to see that. Otherwise? They have to wait until someone finds out they were murdered as a result of their parents "homeschooling".

And feral homeschool parents love to jump down my throat about this, and then get even more pissed when I tell them I'm a homeschool alumni.

Because I know it's not all homeschoolers. But even one is too many, and the lack of protections should scare everyone. If you're a good homeschool parent, nothing will change. If not, you deserve whatever comes your way as a result of adequate oversight.

Children deserve rights.

[selene1311-n]

imo children should be considered equally the responsibility of their entire community, rather than under their parents' control.

[sapphireh3arts]

i know folks are gonna call me a pedo for this one, but i grew up seeing my mom and grandma naked. they had health issues and at times needed care and help showering. and i truly think more kids need to be shown the nonsexual reality of naked women at a young age. there is nothing sexual about my grandmothers breasts, they were simply body parts. more women die of heart attacks because people are too afraid of breasts to do real chest compressions, because they are scared to touch their breasts. the sexualization of our bodies literally kills us. i need people to be more normal about naked bodies and i'm 100% serious.

[almyranpine]

(in australia) the bystander cpr rates for men are 74%, and women are 65%. a recent analysis in NSW showed that women are 50% less likely to receive bystander defibrillation, as it requires exposing the chest to place the pads on the skin.

as someone with breasts, i would much rather be alive and have received CPR, mouth to mouth, and defibrillation, than be dead and clothed. there are also laws in place in australia that protect first aid responders who are just trying to save lives, so a victim cannot charge you, even if they wanted to (which they won’t, because you saved their life).

anyway i didn’t mean to hijack your post OP — just completed my yearly CPR course last week and had the current (australian) stats to back up your statement.

[stackslip]

we're moving to an internet where children would be banned from reaching out for help and friendship online but abusive parents can post their children's every second online to humiliate and expose them for money with no pushback

[mutt-tracks]

does anyone have any songs that make you feel more connected to being a wolf?

[d0gbite]

have a whole spotify playlist actually :)

but here are some faves from it:

[lakevida]

free the nipple has to make a resurgence for a number of reasons but bro look at our upcoming eternity of wet bulb temps youre smoking straight up cock if you think im keeping a shirt on when it hits 105° in new england

[lakevida]

everyone tits out with a parasol is such a beautiful world to imagine that the fact it doesnt currently exist fills me with equal parts fire and misery

[undercover-werewolf-k1d]

I recently started looking into manifestation and since you can literally manifest ANYTHING no matter how illogical, I am definitely manifesting that I can physically shift and be a wolf whenever I want (also manifesting natural fangs and prime wild wolf physical capabilities ofc)

Oh yeah and soccer skills too ig

[tongue-tearer]

are we being so legit, genuine, and deadass right now.

nuke this fucking planet bro. im so fucking tired of people watering down serious terms to fictional content and correct me if im wrong but i have never ever heard of anything about ao3 allowing explicit photos and/or videos of real children getting sexually abused and exploited

[undercover-werewolf-k1d]

[undercover-werewolf-k1d]

Dawg

Hooman

[undercover-werewolf-k1d]

did you end up forming an opinion on incest? /genq

Yes, I'm pro/neutral (depends on what "me" you're asking). I don't think it's a bad thing or strictly abusive/non-consensual on itself, but I acknowledge that in our current society and how the topic is treated, it has a big potential to be

I don't "encourage" it but I think beings that are in (consensual, non-abusive) consang/incest relationships should not be harassed or have legal consequences

[skylargoesbark]

begging people to stop putting commonly triggering things in their intro posts. i don't care if you trigger tag it, it's still bad.

let's say that i'm triggered by swears. i go onto someone's blog and try to check their pinned, but i see the beeg grey popup and "filtered tags: #tw swears". so now i can't read that person's intro post, where they presumably have important info like boundaries, pronouns, et cetera. i cannot look at that information without getting triggered. my old intro had swearing and i tagged it as such. i had several blogs dming me asking for a truncated version sans the swears because they could not read it.

so please just like. y'all. please make nontriggering intros. if the triggers come from decor then you can make an alt version which you link just please. it's easier to avoid that flashing blinkie or that gory png than to have to deal with people not being able to read important information about you.

[domestic-werefox-1985]

The shimmerqueer community's fundamental misunderstanding of no-act's necrophilic contact stance is incredibly harmful. Just like their anti-consang stance, it is labeling innocent people as abusers and taking away the sexual rights of consenting people.

People cannot change their mind about anything after they die.

They cannot change their mind about what/who is in their will, they cannot change their mind about how their remains are preserved, they cannot change their mind about where they're buried, they cannot change their mind about whether they donate organs, they cannot change their mind about whether their ashes are spread and where.

But people know this before they die. They choose before hand to consent to these things, knowing they will not be around to change them. We do our best to respect these wishes because ultimately the person's body is their property, and what they want done with it after they move on is what we should respect.

I'm a zoo-exclusive necro, so this debate doesn't even involve me. I'm not looking to fuck any dead humans now or honestly ever. But who knows, maybe when I die I'll want a necro lover to have some fun with me, and I sure as hell am not going to let other people decide what I can and cannot let happen to my body.

Stop ignoring people's sexual rights because you don't like what they consent to.

[duskypigeon]

on the context of this and some of my thoughts,

1. im not sure how often the stuff actually happens so im not sure why people get so worried about it. (i dont mean to be insensitive or anything im just not sure how common these agreements are)

2. the point is informed consent. they discuss everything beforehand

3. if the necro person violates what was agreed upon, thats not bc theyre a necro its bc they dont care about consent