I did not agree to this.

Most of these aren't mine.

[validblogname]

i mean...

[validblogname]

[validblogname]

one fight at a time

[validblogname]

[validblogname]

change my mind.

[validblogname]

murderers

[johnnyslittleanimalblog]

[minibunnywolfkins]

❤️🐝

[evolvinggreywolf]

The day after human’s are gone, the earth will begin to regenerate itself. We can’t say the same for bees

[naughtypiggy]

If 2020’s global lockdown taught us nothing else… nature returned in 100 days. You want to save the planet? Stay home. Stop buying shit you don’t need. Start a garden, even if it’s just a few pots on your fire escape.

[guillegdep]

The White House after Trump.

[blizzardofjj]

[00000066]

[silvermoon424]

Bro absolutely COOKED with this.

[ohnoitstbskyen]

If you ever hear the phrase "fascism is aesthetics as politics," that's what this post is talking about.

It's not about being tough on crime, because the absolute toughest most brutal measure you could take against "crime" as a social problem is to alleviate poverty, and increase access to education, healthcare and social mobility.

It's about performing "tough on crime" as an aesthetic by enacting violence against a prop, i.e. minorities and the impoverished, who are fetishized and objectified to represent "crime." They are brutalized as punishment for crime, but never with the purpose of alleviating the problem of crime.

This is why a lot of conservatives and other right wingers can get straight up angry when you suggest things like reform or social measures to reduce crime. They don't want crime to be reduced, they want an eternal war against "crime" because it provides an arena for the righteous to demonstrate virtue by brutalizing their enemies.

[jardindereve]

Candace Dyar

[porterdavis]

[porterdavis]

[fuck-customers]

[validblogname]

i mean...

[04k96]

[validblogname]

felt