Billboards of Silicon Valley. [Photo by Sara Mauskopf]
styofa doing anything
h

Kiana Khansmith
art blog(derogatory)
taylor price

⁂
Keni

Andulka
Monterey Bay Aquarium
almost home
Misplaced Lens Cap
hello vonnie
ojovivo

oozey mess

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

tannertan36
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

@theartofmadeline
sheepfilms

roma★
seen from United Kingdom
seen from New Zealand

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from France

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Spain
@valledelsilicio
Billboards of Silicon Valley. [Photo by Sara Mauskopf]
It's like tech media has developed a rash. Non-stories alleging turmoil in tech companies carved by writers out of conversations with anonymous sources or outsiders have been multiplying in recent weeks. The latest comes via Business Insider, which wants everyone to know that designers and engineers tend to be at odds sometimes. In a piece about Jony Ive, the designer who brought Apple back to life and later designed the iPhone ad iPad, Jay Yarow writes:
Ive reportedly wouldn't let Scott Forstall, the lead designer of iPhone software, into the design studio where Ive's team created Apple's products. Ive likewise wasn't invited to Forstall's product meetings. The two of them reportedly detested each other. Eventually, [Apple CEO Tim] Cook forced Forstall out of the company, choosing Ive over Forstall. But Forstall wasn't the first executive to lose a power struggle with Ive.
Jon Rubinstein, Apple's head of engineering, was forced out of Apple after butting heads with Ive. In that case, Jobs chose Ive over Rubinstein. Tony Fadell also reportedly didn't get along with Ive, according to a biography of Ive. In each of these cases, though, one could make the argument that Apple made the right decision. When Rubinstein left Apple, he landed at Palm as CEO. Palm ended up a failure. Forstall was the man responsible for Siri and Maps, two of the biggest mistakes at Apple in recent years. As for Fadell, he's had impressive success with Nest, a company that was sold to Google for $3 billion. Still, Apple managed to do well when Fadell officially left the company in March 2010.
It makes sense that Ive was butting heads with people like Rubinstein, a hardware engineer. Ive is a designer. There's a tension there. An engineer wants a designer to compromise his design to make it easier to make the product a reality. A designer has no patience for changing his or her design.
Every year, the Chronicle of Philanthropy produces a list of the 50 largest donors, which often reads like a Who's Who of tech. But according to Inside Philanthropy, this isn't a very useful measure of generosity.
"If Jim Walton gives away $350 million this year, he could well find himself named one of the most generous donors in 2014," writes Michael Gentilucci. "But since Walton is currently worth $34.5 billion, that donation would represent only around 1 percent of his net worth and, if it was a one-off gift, it could be misleading to describe Walton as among the most generous Americans. In contrast, a person who is worth $1 billion and gives away $500 million really is engaging in an eye-popping level of generosity."
The new list puts some of the best known people in tech -- many of whom give millions annually -- in the miserly category.
Recently Google cofounder Larry Page infuriated the world when he told Wired magazine that he would leave his estate to another Silicon Valley billionaire, Elon Musk, of Tesla fame, instead of a charity. Page is a strong supporter of Musk's goal to get humans to Mars and sees it as a very worthy cause.
And speaking of death, just a few weeks ago, a mystery tech billionaire purchased the world's most valuable life insurance policy of all time at $201 million, ousting the previous world record held by a mystery entertainer who got a $100 million policy.
The yacht of the late Steve Jobs, Venus in Portugal, cruising around Cabo San Lucas bay. [Photo by Roberto Verde]
The company skyTran recently approached the Mountain View City Council about a demonstration car pod system at the NASA Ames Research Center. The driverless, elevated vehicles were pitched as a way to alleviate some of the traffic caused by Google employees coming and going from the Googleplex at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway in Mountain View.
The two-person pods are electrical and use magnetic levitation, enabling them to glide at up to 150 miles per hour off the city's roadways. skyTran needs $5 million to build its full test-scale model. Councilman Mike Kasperzak thought it would be a great investment for the city, noting that once skyTran developed the technology, private companies could move in and reap the profits.
Unfortunately for everyone, the council at the center of the tech capital of the nation proved to be as conservative as city councils elsewhere. Worried about unproved technology, they refused to pony up even $750,000 for a grant.
"That's not our role to be a venture capitalist or an investor," said councilwoman Margaret Abe Koga, bemoaning the fact that the city is already routinely approached by companies to serve as a beta tester. [San Jose Mercury News]
Additionally, according to the Palo Alto Daily Post, a young man was arrested the previous day for public drunkenness and, in a separate incident, a middle aged man was arrested for possession of drug paraphernalia in Palo Alto. In Menlo Park, three middle-aged persons were cited for possession of drug paraphernalia in separate incidents. In Belmont, a young woman was arrested for public drunkenness, a middle-aged woman was arrested for driving under the influence, and in a separate incident, an 81-year-old man was arrested for driving under the influence. It's as wild as it gets -- thanks, no doubt, to the spirit of St. Patrick's Day, which fell on Monday.
Last month, the Palo Alto school district initiated an inquiry after it was discovered that grades in its database had been changed. Despite the discovery -- which led school officials straight to the guilty party -- it's difficult to say how, exactly, the student managed the social engineering-cum-hack exploit. Today's edition of the Palo Alto Daily Post called the hacking "sophisticated." Could anyone expect less in Silicon Valley? It's a little surprising that only now are measures being put in place to detect unusual activity.
Everyone was overjoyed earlier this week when Brit Morin, the "Martha Stewart of Silicon Valley," made a mistake that exposed her as a tech poser. On Wednesday, Morin baked a cake wishing the internet a happy birthday. The problem? It wasn't the internet's birthday, but, rather, that of the world wide web. Though "the web" and "the internet" are used interchangeably today to describe the online space, the web is actually the interlinked system of hypertext documents that are accessed using the internet with a browser.
The British computer scientist Time Berners-Lee first wrote a proposal for the web on March 12, 1989, making the web 25 this week (the first browser, however, which would come to be known as Nexus, didn't come around until 1990). Meanwhile, some version of the internet has existed since the 1960s -- though exactly when it came to be is a matter of some debate.
Some say that the internet was born 44 years ago when a computer to computer message was relayed for the first time from the University of California, Los Angeles campus to Stanford by Leonard Kleinrock and his colleagues, who were then developing the Advanced Research Projects Agency Network (ARPANET), a government project in computer communications. This, however, happened not on March 12 but on September 2.
This is a common error, but many were unable to contain their glee when they saw Morin's cake. Morin has been a target of unwarranted rage since she bagged $6.3 million from investors to develop her do-it-yourself media platform and commercial craft kits line. Discounting the interest in the niche in much the same way as people first discounted the image-focused network Pinterest, people quickly pointed to Morin's husband, the founder of the private network Path and former Facebook employee-turned-millionaire, as the explanation.
Morin has had to contend with the suggestion that she's only managed to raise funds for her start-up because of her husband's connections. It's the sort of thing men married to successful women rarely, if ever, have to deal with.
"No VC [venture capitalist] would invest in a company that doesn't have successful growth metrics and a solid revenue plan," she explained to Wired when they asked her about the criticism. "If the VC did, they would be pretty dumb."
Valleywag reported on the cake error, bitterly noting, "Correcting most people when they mix up the World Wide Web (which turns 25 this week) and the internet (the physical infrastructure that dates back to the 60s) would be icky nerd pedantry. But most people weren't given $6 million dollars last year to build a technology company."
"As the world becomes more complex and governments everywhere struggle, trust in the internet is more important today than ever," writes Mark Zuckerberg on his Facebook profile. He goes on:
The internet is our shared space. It helps us connect. It spreads opportunity. It enables us to learn. It gives us a voice. It makes us stronger and safer together.
To keep the internet strong, we need to keep it secure. That's why at Facebook we spend a lot of our energy making our services and the whole internet safer and more secure. We encrypt communications, we use secure protocols for traffic, we encourage people to use multiple factors for authentication and we go out of our way to help fix issues we find in other people's services.
The internet works because most people and companies do the same. We work together to create this secure environment and make our shared space even better for the world.
This is why I've been so confused and frustrated by the repeated reports of the behavior of the US government. When our engineers work tirelessly to improve security, we imagine we're protecting you against criminals, not our own government.
The US government should be the champion for the internet, not a threat. They need to be much more transparent about what they're doing, or otherwise people will believe the worst.
I've called President Obama to express my frustration over the damage the government is creating for all of our future. Unfortunately, it seems like it will take a very long time for true full reform.
So it's up to us -- all of us -- to build the internet we want. Together, we can build a space that is greater and a more important part of the world than anything we have today, but is also safe and secure. I'm committed to seeing this happen, and you can count on Facebook to do our part.
"Inside the Google Sex Scandal" promised one of the headlining stories on the cover of Vanity Fair's April 2014 issue. Vanity Fair has, for years, made a reputation for itself as a source of investigative journalism that provides not only information, but a taste of the lives of people in its cross hairs. In the case of the story of the Google "sex scandal," however, it grossly missed the mark.
To begin, this scandal isn't a scandal. It's the story of Google co-founder Sergey Brin and Anne Wojcicki, founder of the genetic-testing company 23andMe and one of the most fearless CEOs in the country, who quietly separated 10 months ago after a six-year marriage. The two, who run a philanthropic organization together and whose main businesses are enmeshed (Google invested in 23andMe), strived to maintain a cordial relationship in the face of media scrutiny.
That failed when the press got hold of information about Amanda Rosenberg, a British transplant heading marketing for Google's Glass, who'd often been seen with Brin, also part of the department that developed the wearable computer. Brin and Rosenberg were seeing one another, and soon speculation erupted about the cause of Brin's separation. Rosenberg, of course, was instantly reviled as a home-wrecker, caught red-handed trying to sleep her way to the top.
The article points to Rosenberg's simultaneous relationship with another Googler, Hugo Barra, who at the time was working with the Android team. Though Barra had been thinking about leaving Google to work at Xiaomi for a while, when the plan was finalized, people couldn't resist suggesting that Barra had been "pushed out" by the co-founder of Google.
Nowhere in this and other reports does an author concede that relationships are complex, that sometimes marriages end before people announce they've separated, or that dating doesn't necessarily mean exclusivity.
The worst part, perhaps, is the inherent sexism of the Vanity Fair piece. Wojcicki, a fearless executive and powerhouse in medicine, is described as "the wife of a rich man," if slightly different. Rosenberg, who came to Google on her own steam and has spearheaded the Glass campaign by coining the phrase "OK, Glass" and putting it on catwalks at New York Fashion Week, is described as a mid-20s, "young fresh shark."
The article goes as far as to quote an "Atherton socialite" to make its point: "It’s almost like you get a Stanford degree so you can work at Google, so you can find a husband."
In the middle of all this is Brin, who -- despite being a force of nature in real life -- is left completely free of personality, a floating twig between two battling currents personified by women battling for his resources. It's the most tired cliche in the book and a sad revelation of the progress women have yet to make in this country.
Abraham Farag joined Apple in March of 1999, to work on a mouse that would replace the controversial "hockey puck" mouse that shipped with the original iMac (second to the last in the photo above). But the mouse that would transcend all design was actually an accident.
"It all started with a model we did not have time to finish," says Farag. "We had made six of these great form models to show Steve [Jobs]. They were fully done, with all the parting lines cut in for buttons and different plastic parts, and all the colors just right."
At the last minute, the design team had decided to create a model that would echo the look of a previous design, but Jobs came around before they had time to draw the buttons on to the model to indicate where they'd go.
"It looked like a grey blob," Farag says. "We were going to put that model into a box so people wouldn’t see it." But they didn't have time even to do that. When Jobs entered, he made a bee-line for the unfinished mouse.
"That’s genius," he said. "We don't want to have any buttons."
"That's right, Steve," someone replied, rolling with it. "No buttons at all."
Steve Jobs really hated buttons. It's difficult to say exactly how much, but you can thank that loathing for the introduction and popularization of devices with screens agile enough to respond to a variety of touches depending on what app was being used. And just the one button. [via Cult of Mac]
In December, Obama met with 15 tech executives, including Apple CEO Tim Cook, Google Chairman Eric Schmidt, Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer, and Twitter CEO Dick Costolo, with the official purpose of discussing how the White House might improve its Healthcare.gov site. But the tech leaders had more pressing matters -- the National Security Agency's mass surveillance tactics as revealed by whistle-blower Edward Snowden.
During the meeting, Mark Pincus -- founder of the social game giant Zynga -- asked the president to pardon Snowden. Obama said that he could not. But Pincus is not the only person in tech who supports the whistle-blower.
Tech companies have been criticized for handing user data over to the NSA, though many of their data centers are known to have been accessed without consent from the companies. For months tech giants have been asking the Obama administration and Congress to take a stand against these invasive surveillance programs that undermine freedom.
Yesterday, when Snowden conferenced into the tech conference SXSW in Austin, he received a warm reception from technologists in attendance. Tim Berners-Lee, the founder of the World Wide Web, thanked Snowden, saying that his actions were profoundly in the public interest. [via CNN and CNET]
It's hard to pinpoint the exact moment that San Francisco morphed into bizarro-world New York, when it went from being the city’s dorky, behoodied West Coast cousin to being, in many ways, more New York-ish than New York itself — its wealth more impressive, its infatuation with power and status more blinding.
For me, the epiphany came in December, when I attended a party at a seven-story San Francisco townhouse. The house — used as an office and party pad by a young entrepreneur who had sold his start-up for millions a few years earlier — was the kind of bachelor pad Richie Rich might have set up for himself, had he been 23 and a Burning Man regular. The walls were covered in inspirational phrases (FOLLOW YOUR HEART, HOLISTIC MINDFULNESS & WELLNESS), and the party was centered on a split-level pool and hot tub that took up the entire middle section of the house. Five inflatable killer whales floated idly in the water. A bearded man was giving out back massages at water’s edge using a pair of repurposed automotive buffers, one in each hand. And loaner swimsuits — washed between wearings, we were assured — were provided for all.
As the hours ticked on and the booze kicked in, some shed their Louboutin heels and jumped in the pool; others marinated in the hot tub and told start-up war stories. It was the kind of bash you’d have found in Easthampton circa 2006, or West Egg circa 1922. And as if to cement San Francisco’s newfound place at the center of a certain social universe, the person greeting newcomers at the door was Julia Allison, the notorious glam blogger, whose smile had dotted the New York party scene just a few years earlier.
Meanwhile, certain pockets of San Francisco have become the sort of gilded playground that New York once was. Brand-new Teslas with vanity plates like DISRUPTD drift down the streets of the Mission District, where pawnshops and porn stores used to be. Paper millionaires spend their nights at the Battery, a members-only club with a tech-heavy roster and a $10,000-per-night penthouse suite. Upscale restaurants pop up at regular intervals, each with a more elite clientele and a more Portlandia-esque menu — everything from the $4 artisanal toast that sparked a citywide craze to the underground supper clubs serving kombucha pairings with sustainable-seafood dinners. Finding an affordable apartment in the city has become, as one tech worker lamented to me recently, “a Hunger Games scenario.”
In many ways, San Francisco is the nation’s new success theater. It’s the city where dreamers go to prove themselves—the place where just being able to afford a normal life serves as an indicator of pluck and ability. I had lunch the other day with a Harvard Business School student who belonged to a 90-person section, of whom 12 were start-up entrepreneurs. You can imagine the whole dozen packing their bags for the West Coast after collecting their M.B.A.’s, thinking: If I can make it there, I’ll make it anywhere.
Which isn't to say that San Francisco has pulled off this transition effortlessly. The city still has its lefty legacy, after all, and as the tech sector has grown into an economic powerhouse, so has resentment toward its elites. Protesters, angry about Silicon Valley’s effect on the local economy, are blockading tech-employee shuttles in the streets; in Oakland last year, a Google bus had its window shattered by a rock. San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee, long suspected of being in the tech industry’s pocket, is accused of not doing enough to help the working class cope with rising costs and widening inequality. Although most right-thinking one-percenters cringed when venture capitalist Tom Perkins compared the treatment of the rich in San Francisco to the treatment of Jews by Nazis on Kristallnacht, the hostility he felt is real. Silicon Valley is exploding, as Wall Street did in the 1980s, as Detroit did in the 1940s. And as in those booms, not everyone is going along for the ride.
From "Is San Francisco New York?" by Kevin Roose for New York Magazine.
Facebook is now paying the salary of Mary Ferguson-Dixon, a police officer in the Belle Haven neighborhood of Menlo Park where the tech giant is located. Belle Haven, one of the poorer areas in the city, is known for its high crime rate.
Menlo Park police chief Robert Jonsen has been wanting to tackle that crime rate, but funds have been tight. When he pinged Facebook a few weeks ago, the giant's response was immediate: Facebook will fund the officer for three years at a cost of $200,000 per year, and with an option to extend the agreement for another two years.
Ferguson-Dixon is a veteran of the Menlo Park police force; she holds bachelor's degrees in criminal justice and sociology. Her main duties will include being a first responder to incidents in the area and a liaison with schools and businesses to create emergency plans -- including violent intruder drills at schools and business campuses in the area.
She will be posted at a substation at Hamilton Avenue and Willow Road, just a few hundred yards away from the tech giant's new campus, across highway 84 and the Facebook headquarters.
"There's really something special happening in Menlo Park," said Menlo Park mayor Ray Mueller in response to Facebook's offer.
In contrast, the rest of the Bay Area wasted no time in criticizing the move. The tech gossip blog Valleywag whined: "this is just another instance of Silicon Valley slapping a private band-aid on a public dearth, the same rationale that favors private buses over a properly funded public transit system. It's the same old false dilemma: Well, we can either have no cops in rough neighborhoods, or a Facebook cop! Who need to fix anything when a deep-pocketed tech firm is willing to find a self-interested quasi-solution?" [via NBC Bay Area]
They call him "Evil Elmo" at Fisherman's Wharf in San Francisco. Like many from New York to Los Angeles, Dan Sandler dons a costume and offers to pose with tourists for photos, hoping to get a few dollars out of it. Unlike other street performers, however, the 50-year-old doesn't let the conversation end with a refusal -- he's been seen following tourists and heard screaming obscenities and anti-Semitic rants at them.
Sandler started as New York's problem, says the San Francisco Chronicle. He was arrested multiple times for aggressive panhandling in both Central Park and Times Square. Then he was San Francisco's problem, then Los Angeles' problem, then Honolulu's problem. Then it was back to New York to face charges for trying to extort $2 million from the Girl Scouts of America. Who extorts the Girl Scouts?
A group of young homeless teens have taken issue with his disruptive presence. Since San Francisco police can't remove Sandler if he's not seen breaking the law by an officer, the youths have determined to harass him away. The resulting skirmishes between Evil Elmo and the street kids are frightening tourists away, and have put local businesses in a weird position. Though they want to see Evil Elmo go, they're losing business in the process.
Most recently, one of the street kids stood next to Evil Elmo holding a sign reading "Rape-O." In a turn of events that will shock absolutely no one, the kid was arrested and taken in for a psych evaluation.
"There's justice, then there's street justice," he told the Chron after his release. "It's up to the street kids to take care of the things the police can't." [via San Francisco Chronicle]
Around the same time that Twitter was moving in to its sleek headquarters in San Francisco in 2012, rumors started circulating about another Twitter land-grab, this time by founder Jack Dorsey. Dorsey is rumored to have dropped $10 million for a two-bedroom in Seacliff, San Francisco's beautiful ocean-view 'hood.
Built in the mid-60s, the 3,700-square foot house has the sort of crazy-yet-wondrous features you'd expect from the era, including a 20-foot retractable glass roof. "I need the sea because it teaches me," Dorsey tweeted at the time, quoting Pablo Neruda. Indeed, the sea is right outside the window at his place -- along with the Golden Gate Bridge.
The house was listed for $18 million in 2008, but even after the wild discount, it's still the most expensive two-bedroom in San Francisco. [via Curbed]
The coffee shop, called the Red Door, was a spare little operation tucked into the corner of a chic industrial-style art gallery and event space (clients include Facebook, Microsoft, Evernote, Google) in downtown San Francisco. There were just three employees working behind the counter: one making coffee, one taking orders, and the soulful guy making toast. In front of him, laid out in a neat row, were a few long Pullman loaves—the boxy Wonder Bread shape, like a train car, but recognizably handmade and freshly baked. And on the brief menu, toast was a standalone item—at $3 per slice.
It took me just a few seconds to digest what this meant: that toast, like the cupcake and the dill pickle before it, had been elevated to the artisanal plane. So I ordered some. It was pretty good. It tasted just like toast, but better.
A couple of weeks later I was at a place called Acre Coffee in Petaluma, a smallish town about an hour north of San Francisco on Highway 101. Half of the shop’s food menu fell under the heading "Toast Bar." Not long after that I was with my wife and daughter on Divisadero Street in San Francisco, and we went to The Mill, a big light-filled cafe and bakery with exposed rafters and polished concrete floors, like a rustic Apple Store. There, between the two iPads that served as cash registers, was a small chalkboard that listed the day’s toast menu. Everywhere the offerings were more or less the same: thick slices of good bread, square-shaped, topped with things like small-batch almond butter or apricot marmalade or sea salt.
Back at the Red Door one day, I asked the manager what was going on. Why all the toast? "Tip of the hipster spear," he said.
I had two reactions to this: First, of course, I rolled my eyes. How silly; how twee; how perfectly San Francisco, this toast. And second, despite myself, I felt a little thrill of discovery. How many weeks would it be, I wondered, before artisanal toast made it to Brooklyn, or Chicago, or Los Angeles? How long before an article appears in Slate telling people all across America that they're making toast all wrong? How long before the backlash sets in?
For whatever reason, I felt compelled to go looking for the origins of the fancy toast trend. How does such a thing get started? What determines how far it goes? I wanted to know. Maybe I thought it would help me understand the rise of all the seemingly trivial, evanescent things that start in San Francisco and then go supernova across the country — the kinds of products I am usually late to discover and slow to figure out. I'm not sure what kind of answer I expected to turn up. Certainly nothing too impressive or emotionally affecting. But what I found was more surprising and sublime than I could have possibly imagined.
If the discovery of artisanal toast had made me roll my eyes, it soon made other people in San Francisco downright indignant. I spent the early part of my search following the footsteps of a very low-stakes mob. "$4 Toast: Why the Tech Industry Is Ruining San Francisco" ran the headline of an August article on a local technology news site called VentureBeat.
"Flaunting your wealth has been elevated to new lows," wrote the author, Jolie O’Dell. "We don’t go to the opera; we overspend on the simplest facets of life." For a few weeks $4 toast became a rallying cry in the city's media — an instant parable and parody of the shallow, expensive new San Francisco — inspiring thousands of shares on Facebook, several follow-up articles, and a petition to the mayor's office demanding relief from the city's high costs of living.
The butt of all this criticism appeared to be The Mill, the rustic-modern place on Divisadero Street. The Mill was also, I learned, the bakery that supplies the Red Door with its bread. So I assumed I had found the cradle of the toast phenomenon.
I was wrong. When I called Josey Baker, the — yes — baker behind The Mill’s toast, he was a little mystified by the dustup over his product while also a bit taken aback at how popular it had become. "On a busy Saturday or Sunday we'll make 350 to 400 pieces of toast," he told me. "It's ridiculous, isn’t it?"
But Baker assured me that he was not the Chuck Berry of fancy toast. He was its Elvis: he had merely caught the trend on its upswing. The place I was looking for, he and others told me, was a coffee shop in the city’s Outer Sunset neighborhood — a little spot called Trouble.
The Trouble Coffee & Coconut Club (its full name) is a tiny storefront next door to a Spanish-immersion preschool, about three blocks from the Pacific Ocean in one of the city's windiest, foggiest, farthest-flung areas. As places of business go, I would call Trouble impressively odd.
Instead of a standard café patio, Trouble’s outdoor seating area is dominated by a substantial section of a tree trunk, stripped of its bark, lying on its side. Around the perimeter are benches and steps and railings made of salvaged wood, but no tables and chairs. On my first visit on a chilly September afternoon, people were lounging on the trunk drinking their coffee and eating slices of toast, looking like lions draped over tree limbs in the Serengeti.
The shop itself is about the size of a single-car garage, with an L-shaped bar made of heavily varnished driftwood. One wall is decorated with a mishmash of artifacts — a walkie-talkie collection, a mannequin torso, some hand tools. A set of old speakers in the back blares a steady stream of punk and noise rock. And a glass refrigerator case beneath the cash register prominently displays a bunch of coconuts and grapefruit. Next to the cash register is a single steel toaster. Trouble’s specialty is a thick slice of locally made white toast, generously covered with butter, cinnamon, and sugar: a variation on the cinnamon toast that everyone's mom, including mine, seemed to make when I was a kid in the 1980s. It is, for that nostalgic association, the first toast in San Francisco that really made sense to me.
Trouble’s owner, and the apparent originator of San Francisco's toast craze, is a slight, blue-eyed, 34-year-old woman with freckles tattooed on her cheeks named Giulietta Carrelli. She has a good toast story: She grew up in a rough neighborhood of Cleveland in the '80s and '90s in a big immigrant family, her father a tailor from Italy, her mother an ex-nun. The family didn't eat much standard American food. But cinnamon toast, made in a pinch, was the exception. "We never had pie," Carrelli says. "Our American comfort food was cinnamon toast."
The other main players on Trouble’s menu are coffee, young coconuts served with a straw and a spoon for digging out the meat, and shots of fresh-squeezed grapefruit juice called "Yoko." It's a strange lineup, but each item has specific meaning to Carrelli. Toast, she says, represents comfort. Coffee represents speed and communication. And coconuts represent survival — because it's possible, Carrelli says, to survive on coconuts provided you also have a source of vitamin C. Hence the Yoko. (Carrelli tested this theory by living mainly on coconuts and grapefruit juice for three years, "unless someone took me out to dinner." It was not a fad diet; Carrelli has fallen on her share of hard times.)
The menu also features a go-for-broke option called "Build Your Own Damn House," which consists of a coffee, a coconut, and a piece of cinnamon toast. Hanging in the door is a manifesto that covers a green chalkboard. "We are local people with useful skills in tangible situations," it says, among other things. "Drink a cup of Trouble. Eat a coconut. And learn to build your own damn house. We will help. We are building a network."
Like so many things in the Bay Area, artisanal toast has become a symbol of excess. But if one can look beyond the contagious appreciation that has driven its demand, one stands to find a wonderful origin story within a tale of survival.
From "A Toast Story" by John Gravois -- you should read the whole thing. Photo by Zack Pianko.