Meeting the Needs of 21st Century Employees: Flexible Work Arrangements Part I
Rapid technological advancements and demographic shifts are changing the way human resource professionals manage the workforce. Human resource management (HRM) systems and their respective human resource managers are stuck in a tight spot: faced with the challenge to attract and retain the best and the brightest, keep up with changing demands of a multigenerational workforce, and utilize technology to advance human competency and meet objectives. For the purpose of this blog, we will focus on the effects of the Baby Boomer retirement wave and the impact that young Millennials have on HRM. Compared to older generations, Millennials are much more demanding, yet have so much potential. To add to that point, younger workers have less loyalty to their employers compared to previous generations, which is important for organizations to consider. According to Berman et al., (2010), forward thinking organizations are responding to increased workforce demands, such as the emerging needs of younger Gen X and Gen Y workers, by introducing employee responsive policies. In so doing, human resource managers wish to reduce work/life conflict, helping employees find harmony between personal and professional obligations. Such policies help make the workplace more attractive, facilitating HR professionals pursuit of younger workers. Berman et al., (2010) introduce a variety of flexible work arrangements that organizations implement and incorporate the use of technology to administer, which include flextime, telecommuting, alternative work schedules, and family/work programs. Berman et al., (2010) introduced evidence to support claims that such employee-friendly policies can help organizations achieve positive outcomes.
Selden (2009) points out that the challenge is determining which policies and programs will be the most beneficial in retaining key employees—or, in this case, tech-savvy Millennials. Nontraditional scheduling or remote workplace options may prove advantageous to organizations that use them—particularly if they must compete for fresh talent from younger generational cohorts. Selden (2009) acknowledges that there is no one-size-fits-all program for organizations. Offering a variety of programs is essential to meeting varying needs of employees and necessary to build a human capital system that is most successful in developing capabilities desired. Most notably, private sector organizations are beginning to take a person-centric organizational model, as Selden (2009) has identified. Public sector organizations should move in that same direction to make their HRM systems malleable and responsive to changing workforce demands and market conditions. In the following sections, we will discuss the major arguments and recommendations regarding the strategic implementation of flexible work arrangements as presented within the Society of Human Resource Management's (SHRM) summary report titled, "Workplace Flexibility in the 21st Century: Meeting the Needs of the Changing Workforce.”
Summary of SHRM's major arguments regarding the importance of flexible work arrangements
The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) wrote a report regarding workplace flexibility, based upon research and results from polls and surveys the organization conducted. The summary report begins by pointing to various trends affecting the 21st century workplace. Similar to the findings of Berman et al., (2010), SHRM (n.d.) also attributes change in the workplace to advancing technology, emerging demands for work-life balance, demographic shifts, and diverse needs of a multigenerational workforce. The agency conducted polls and surveys among other research, collecting pertinent data to demonstrate that both employees and employers benefit from flexible work arrangements (FWAs). SHRM first claims that human resource managers can implement FWAs to achieve organizational goals and simultaneously meet the needs of 21st century employees. Following, the agency argues that a flexible organizational culture and properly communicated expectations between employees and managers help create effective FWAs. Once FWAs are in place, SHRM advises that human resource managers should review such programs to determine the organizational benefit and rate of utilization through evaluations and assessments. Within the report, SHRM (n.d.) argues that the success of flexible work arrangements largely depends on the relations established between managers and the staff. Most importantly, HR professionals need to align the FWA programs offered with the organizational culture to ensure successful implementation and efficiency (SHRM, n.d.).
When successfully developed and implemented, FWAs can help organizations achieve the following: attraction, recruitment, and retention of high potential candidates and a diverse talent pool through the provision of generous work accommodations; reduced stress in the workplace, through the improvement of employees’ mental and physical health; increase in employee job satisfaction through organizational flexibility and much more (SHRM, n.d.). The Society of Human Resource Management constructed provocative arguments in advocating for the use of FWAs in the workplace, helping HR professionals make decisions to meet the needs of the 21st century workforce.
Discussion of SHRM's recommendations for meeting the needs of the 21st century workforce
SHRM proposes ways in which human resource professionals can help their organizations overcome issues relating to the development and/or implementation of FWAs. HR managers need to assess the professional and personal needs of the workforce and demographic diversity. In so doing, organizations will be closer to implementing strategic HR policies and, in this case, flexible arrangements that closely align with employee demands. Every so often, these policies must be updated to keep up with changing demands and affirm efficiency. We can clearly see that the 21st century workforce is changing at a rapid pace, which requires an appropriate and rather immediate response. Once implemented, human resource professionals should notify employees that such programs are offered, since proper communication facilitates the implementation process. Employees need to be told that such policies exist and the terms of conditions and job-related expectations in deciding to use them. If employees are not aware that FWAs are offered, then it is more than likely that such programs run the risk of underutilization.
Managerial training is also important to the administration of such policies to ensure fairness for all employees. When employees perceive disparity in the administration of such programs and policies conflict and resentment could arise. SHRM (n.d.) also recommends HR professionals to make sure that FWAs comply with state and federal employment laws, such as the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). HR professionals need to affirm that their policies and practices remain within the boundaries of the rule of law to avoid any unnecessary litigation issues. In sum, the Society of Human Resource Management thoughtfully proposed solid recommendations that HR professionals could use when undertaking the task of aligning organizational objectives with employee needs. Overall, SHRM recommends organizations to explore the general idea of incorporating flexible work arrangements with HRM strategies and policies for the purpose of recruiting and retaining top talent.
Article’s contribution to advancing knowledge on theme and course materials Backed by sound reasoning and methodology, SHRM’s (n.d.) summary report provides an overview of the positive impact that the implementation of flexible work arrangements may have on organizations. Further, as shown above, SHRM provides fundamental recommendations that may help organizations and their respective HR professionals develop and implement effective policies like FWAs. In compiling this substantive survey report, the Society for Human Resource Management contributes to course materials as it advances knowledge on the theme: meeting the needs of 21st century employees. The 21st century workforce is diverse, composed of more minorities, younger professionals (Generation X and Y), and women than previous generations. Further, these 21st century individuals participating in the labor force have distinct needs that organizations need to review closely and consider if remaining competitive is a main priority. SHRM expands on the issue of work/life balance that Berman et al., (2010) also touched upon within the textbook. The agency recommends that employers become flexible and more willing to “rethink the workplace” outside of traditional norms.
The rapid pace of advancing technology, changing workforce demands, and the increasing needs of a diverse workforce does not leave room for hesitation. Forward thinking organizations will confront these challenges immediately, viewing them as opportunities through a “glass half-full” lens—as SHRM argues. The Society for Human Resource Management elaborated on FWAs and provided a glimpse into how such accommodations can really help employers and employees through providing real life examples within the report. When determining whether such flex programs can help or harm an organization’s operations it is important to consult with a source, such as SHRM’s report, to base knowledge and understanding of the issue on statistical data and real-life experiences. In conclusion, SHRM’s survey report contributes to course materials by expanding on the topic of flexible work arrangements, as similarly discussed within the textbook written by Berman et al., (2010), and by providing insight into how organizations can administer such HRM policies efficiently to satisfy needy and non-traditional (21st century) employees.
Justification for adding SHRM's article to the course reading list for PAD 6417
The Society of Human Resource Management is the world’s largest professional organization dedicated to advancing knowledge on HRM policies and practices; therefore, as a globally recognized entity, SHRM is a viable source of information relating to the theme chosen on strategies to address the needs of the workforce. The article chosen to review, specifically SHRM’s report titled, “Workplace Flexibility in the 21st Century: Meeting the Needs of the Changing Workforce,” should be added to the course reading list for PAD 6417, because it offers prime insight and an array of recommendations on the topic of discussion. Further, the agency bases its claims and arguments on statistical information obtained from surveys and other methods of data gathering. HRM is clearly an art, but the study of HRM is also a science. The methodology SHRM used to complete this survey is also essential to demonstrating that point, lending to credibility of the source. SHRM’s (n.d.) survey report is straightforward, allowing the reader to glide smoothly through the data and HRM strategies offered. After reading the article, one can conclude that revamped HRM policies facilitate flexibility in the workplace (i.e. development of flexible work arrangements), and HR can be a significant strategic partner toward meeting important organizational objectives (e.g. meeting the needs of the 21st century workforce). Based on this report, we can conclude that SHRM challenges HR professionals to approach the situation of a demanding workforce optimistically and use FWAs as a tool for recruitment and retention of top talent. The Society of Human Management’s (n.d.) report on workplace flexibility to satisfy the 21st century workforce should be added to the course reading list due to the attractive presentation of the information and range of pertinent recommendations on the subject matter.
References
Berman, E.M., Bowman, J. S., West, J. P., & Van Wart, M. R. (2010). Human resource management in public services: Paradoxes, processes, and problems (4th ed.). United States of America: Sage Publications.
Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (n.d.). Workplace flexibility in the 21st century: Meeting the needs of the changing workforce. SHRM. [Survey Report]. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/research/surveyfindings/articles/documents/09-0464_workplace_flexibility_survey_report_inside_finalonline.pdf
Selden, S.C. (2009). Human capital: Tools and strategies for the public sector. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.












