O M E N

I'm Omen. 30. They/He. Writer | Book hoarder | Gaming addict | Witch • Oracle • Alchemist | Tea enthusiast | Alucard Tepes stan

[ex-riddlecats]

do NOT let people enjoy things. criticize everything at every opportunity. hate on your own interests just to see what its like. never settle. this is the haters way

[evetheealien]

[clownboybebop]

I’m so tired of hot actors with no actual talent or magnetism. we need more ugly little cuntservers giving performances that fuck so hard you leave the theatre with road rash. willem dafoe if you’re out there

[reallyreallyreallytrying]

during the work day my rage metre builds up, allowing me to unleash a powerful & ill advised special attack around 4pm

[liliotl]

who can relate

[wiggly-fruit]

Why did you have to call my autistic ass outtt! Fffkin relatable

[crazycatsiren]

No no you don't understand! I want to watch this show/movie, read this book, listen to this podcast, etc.! But I must be in the right mindset and the exact head space to begin, or I just can't!

[prettiestpear]

[the-most-humble-blog]

[depsidase]

[derinthescarletpescatarian]

This is like when cheap mobile phones were becoming widespread and we got all those bonkers designs

[memewhore]

[anxietyproblem]

[everythingfox]

Working on that summer body

(via)

[everythingfox]

tiny meow

(via)

[postanagramgenerator]

opinions on bears, the gay men, not the animal

ANAGRAM GENERATED:

opinions on bears, the gay men, not the animal

→

phenomenal hot man breasts, aye, ignition on

[anxietyproblem]

[troythecatfish]

[enbycrip]

It’s like “gender” is *actually* a social construct or some shit.

And not only is what any gender means very specific to a specific culture, regardless of the phenotype current people link it to, but even then not everyone in that given culture expresses it the same way, and some people *always* push what that gender and gender expression means.

Because “gender” is not only a social construct; it is a *continuously evolving* social construct.

Queer historians are good at noting that “although we might call x a trans man/a gay man/a nonbinary person etc etc if they lived today, these ideas did not make sense in the social context they lived in”. Historians in general need to get better at realising and elucidating that our modern Western concepts of “man” and “woman” are very different from, and in many ways may not even be recognisable, in, say, medieval Europe, Ancient Rome, medieval/early modern Incan societies, early modern Madagascar, prehistoric Pacific Islander societies, Heian period Japan etc etc, just because we are broadly applying them to many people with similar biological phenotypes.