Claire Keane
Sade Olutola
NASA

Kiana Khansmith
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
🪼
One Nice Bug Per Day
will byers stan first human second
KIROKAZE
No title available
Keni
styofa doing anything

pixel skylines
todays bird
wallacepolsom

oozey mess
sheepfilms
trying on a metaphor

Kaledo Art
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Estonia
seen from Sweden

seen from United States

seen from Estonia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Switzerland
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
@weservethemountain
Working hard from insecurity = proving
Working hard from self worth = building
Being independent from fear = avoidance
Being independent from wholeness = freedom
Overexplaining from anxiety = seeking approval
Explaining from clarity = communication
Staying busy from discomfort = escaping
Staying busy from purpose = creating
Chasing someone from fear = attachment
Choosing someone from confidence = alignment
Avoiding conflict from fear = suppression
Choosing peace from standards = discernment
Overgiving from fear = earning love
Giving from fullness = generosity
Withdrawing from fear = self protection
Taking space from awareness = regulation
Seeking validation from lack = dependency
Receiving validation from wholeness = appreciation
Controlling outcomes from fear = anxiety
Leading outcomes from trust = stability
Being chill from fear = self abandonment
Being calm from security = groundedness
Holding back feelings from fear = disconnection
Pacing vulnerability from wisdom = emotional intelligence
Clinging from fear = scarcity
Allowing from trust = abundance
Perfectionism from fear = never enough
Excellence from self respect = pride
People pleasing from fear = losing yourself
Being kind from alignment = staying yourself
I absolutely blame Facebook for this shift. Words cannot describe how freaking WEIRD it was in the mid-00s when there was suddenly this popular website where you were required to use your real, brickspace name and encouraged to post photos of yourself. Every single bit of Standard Internet Safety prior to then said that you should never ever ever do either of those.
Facebook's origin was low-key as a quasi-stalking enabling application for elites.
Cat paw prints in the medieval floor tiles of the 12th century CE St Peter Church in Wormleighton, England
you know, things like this make me realise that 'imperfections' aren't even really a thing. bc i bet this was when the tiles were just plastered and someone at the time must've been annoyed like 'are you kidding me????' when they saw this. only for us now to appreciate this and for it to be so historical and beautiful. i usually get annoyed when i make mistakes in paintings etc but you never know who might come to appreciate any kind of flaws :')
I don't think those were done by an actual cat. The depth looks off. I'd be willing to believe someone was being cheeky. Doubly so if it was stone rather than baked clay so not possible for a cat to have actually stepped on it.
The 1855 Classification: A 170-Year-Old Wine Price List That Still Rules the World
Imagine this: You walk into a restaurant, and the menu prices were set in 1855. The chef who was charging top dollar back then is still charging top dollar today—even if his cooking has slipped, even if another chef in the same town is producing far better food for half the price. The menu is frozen. It will never be updated. And yet, every collector, every investor, every status-seeker still uses it to decide what wine to order.
That is the Bordeaux Classification of 1855. And once you understand how absurd it is, you can exploit it.
The Origin Story: Napoleon III's Panic
It is 1855. Napoleon III is hosting the Exposition Universelle in Paris—the World's Fair of its day. He needs to showcase France's greatest products to an international audience. Wine is a centerpiece. So he orders the Bordeaux wine brokers to draw up a ranking of the region's best estates.
The brokers do what brokers do: they look at trading prices. Which châteaux commanded the highest prices over the past century? They sort the estates into five tiers—"Growths" —based entirely on what the market had been paying. No blind tastings. No vineyard analysis. No consideration of terroir, winemaking, or potential. Just a historical price chart.
The list is published. And then something strange happens: it is never meaningfully updated again.
The Five Tiers Explained
Think of the Growths as "price bands" frozen in amber:
GrowthThe Watch AnalogyWhat It Meant in 1855First GrowthThe "Rolex" tierThe most expensive, most prestigious wines on earth. Four estates made the cut: Lafite, Latour, Margaux, Haut-Brion. A fifth, Mouton-Rothschild, was added in 1973 after decades of relentless lobbying.Second GrowthThe "Omega" tierExcellent, prestigious wines that traded just below the Firsts. Estates like Las Cases, Pichon Lalande, Montrose, Cos d'Estournel.Third GrowthThe "Tudor" tierRespected, well-known wines. Solid quality, but not the pinnacle.Fourth GrowthThe "Panerai" tierGood wines, but lacking the prestige of the top tiers.Fifth GrowthThe "Tag Heuer" tierThe entry point to the classified growths. Respectable, but at the bottom of the official hierarchy.
There are exactly 60 classified estates in total across all five tiers. If you own one of them, your name is on the list forever. If you do not—no matter how good your wine is—you are not classified. End of story.
The Absurdity: What 170 Years Does to a Price List
Since 1855, a few things have happened:
Vineyards have changed. Some estates have expanded into less desirable land. Others have sold off parcels. The vineyard that produced a great wine in 1855 may not even exist anymore.
Ownership has changed. An estate can pass from a passionate, obsessed family to a faceless corporation that treats wine like a balance sheet item.
Winemaking has changed. Some estates have invested millions in vineyard management, sorting tables, and cellar technology. Others are coasting on their name.
Taste has changed. The wine that commanded top prices in 1855 was a completely different style from what we drink today.
The result? The classification is now a map of 1855 real estate values, not 2026 wine quality. Some Fifth Growths now produce wine that drinks at a Second Growth level. Some Second Growths now outperform First Growths in blind tastings. And some classified estates produce wine that would struggle to justify a supermarket price tag.
Why It Still Matters
If the classification is so outdated, why does anyone still care?
Because the market is lazy. The classification provides a shortcut. A buyer in Hong Kong or New York who knows nothing about wine can simply order a "First Growth" and feel confident he has purchased prestige. This creates a brand premium that has nothing to do with what is in the bottle.
A First Growth label adds thousands of dollars to a bottle of wine—not because the wine is thousands of dollars better, but because the label is recognized by people who do not know any better.
Laidfactor Comment:
Some Fifth Growths drink like Seconds. (Lynch-Bages is the textbook example.)
Some Second Growths drink like Firsts. (Las Cases, Pichon Lalande, Montrose.)
Some First Growths are trading on their name, not their current performance.
The man who walks into a room with a bottle of Lafite is announcing that he spent money. The man who walks in with a mature Las Cases is announcing that he knows something.
Knowledge is the asset. The classification is just the menu. Drink well.
Source: The 1855 Classification: A 170-Year-Old Wine Price List That Still Rules the World
Tiffany Mitchell
Lockheed Martin F-117 Nighthawk
Everybody's gangster until the sky starts glitching.
(by _adamdesjardins)
(by julez__haa)