MLA’s 2016 Updates: A Shift Toward Digital Inclusivity?
In the most recent news surrounding the Modern Language Association, the institution released a statement that in its eighth edition, it will be making major changes to the way that electronic sources should be cited. Many critics have noted that this edition in particular is thinner because it omits a significant amount of details in a given citation. Purdue OWL points out that instead of using a different formula for each kind of source, the eight edition employs a “universal set of guidelines that writers can apply to any source.” The MLA acknowledges that with citing electronic sources, its previous method was “impractical” (Modern Language Association) because such sources are “difficult to define” (Purdue OWL). The new method for citations follows a list that is meant to be intuitive in that it is based on basic questions that the writer will ask himself about their source including, “Who is the author?” and “What is the title?” (Modern Language Association). Another important change in the eighth addition is that it will be accompanied by an online resource called the “digital style center” which is meant to “answers questions and offer sample papers and teaching resources” (Flaherty). This is the first time that there has been a digital component for MLA citations. This is exemplified by the fact that up until now, the online source for information was Purdue University’s Online Writing Lab. This update is potentially important then because it signals a significant shift in the strict and abundant amount of rules which heretofore defined the Modern Language Association. This edition then reflects a moment in the discipline where the need for written systems of citation are adhering to the ubiquity of digital sources. In one sense, much like the amount of writing in a citation of a digital source has been minimized, it appears as though the MLA is acknowledging that other forms of composition are taking over writing and bring with them a new set of rules and criteria for validation as a legitimate source.
With Rosemary Feal stepping down as Executive Director of the MLA in 2017 after fifteen years, the Modern Language Association could potentially undergo other significant changes in the coming year (Chang). The release of the eight edition may signify an updated, more fluid MLA citation system that acknowledges a moment in the discipline of rhetoric and composition that surrounds digital rhetoric. Including and accounting for digital rhetoric is a big shift for an organization that was previously hesitant to include the discipline of Rhetoric and Composition at all. Whether or not this change will be well received when it is official released is still difficult for sources to predict accurately.











