You can’t call yourself a strong, independent woman if you’re living off of your ex-husband.
Jules of Nature
Stranger Things
$LAYYYTER
sheepfilms
Keni
Claire Keane

#extradirty

blake kathryn
🪼
Cosmic Funnies
hello vonnie
Mike Driver

Kiana Khansmith
art blog(derogatory)
h
noise dept.
dirt enthusiast
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
tumblr dot com
will byers stan first human second

seen from Malaysia
seen from Paraguay
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@worst-patriarchy-ever
You can’t call yourself a strong, independent woman if you’re living off of your ex-husband.
Guys, don’t do this. She doesn’t need you to show her how she deserves to be treated. She’s well aware. She’s not going to have sex with you because you spent money on her. And she shouldn’t be demonized for that. She’s clearly let you know that she’s not interested, so be a true friend and allow her to pay her own way when you go out. I know it’s cute to say that you’re “spoiling her”, but that’s not a good thing. She’s going to expect everyone to treat her like that and they won’t.
Also, she’s not the bad guy here. She’s made it clear that she’s not interested and he won’t take the hint.
According to this moron, a man can’t explain anything to a woman unless she specifically says that she wants it explained. This is absurd. I refuse to believe that women’s feelings are so fragile that I have to have permission every time I explain something to a woman. And I would hate for women to ask me if I understand something every time they feel the need to explain it to me. That’s not how normal conversation works.
Furthermore, I will again state that if you have derogatory terms based on someone’s gender, then you’re being sexist. It is not sufficient to end sexism against women. You have to end sexism completely. Putting up barriers one way, ensures that the barrier will remain up both ways, even if that is not your intent. In other words, if you tell men that they can’t be sexist, but tell women that being sexist is fine, you assure that men will resent women for it, and their sexism will grow.
This was posted by a friend of mine. He apparently buys into the belief that all men are bad, except him and a few people who are just like him. But most men, of course, want nothing more than sex from you, and will be nice to you to get it. This is of course, the polar opposite of women, who are all nice, with no exception.
The reality is that most people, men and women, and those outside of those categories, are nice. But society only encourages us to believe that about women (sugar and spice and all that), and those others who don’t belong in the cis-men category.
Across the world women are prioritized. It is absolutely a good thing to release people from prison who have been appropriately punished, rehabilitated and can rejoin society. But let’s all acknowledge that the women were released first because people all over the world prioritize the health and safety of women over that of men.
Vijayawada (Andhra Pradesh) [India], November 7 (ANI): Andhra Pradesh government has decided to release 55 women prisoners serving life term
Ruby nearly didn’t have a daddy. For the first two-and-a-half years of her life, I did everything I could to scupper her relationship with h
What a terrible article. I realize we’re supposed to be overjoyed at the “happy ending” here, and that’s the problem.
This woman cost her former husband thousands in legal fees. Has she paid him back?
She effectively kidnapped his daughter. She took his parenting time away. She made false accusations against him. Does she face any consequences?
She took her daughter’s time away from her dad. Does she face consequences for that?
In the end, dad gets every other Saturday. Why not 50/50 custody? Is it because she’s such a vile, narcissistic bitch that if he got 50/50 custody, she’d still be trying to kidnap their daughter to this day?
I don’t understand why this is a happy ending. This is a story of how a woman used the family court system to steal that man’s time with his daughter. She should be punished, but our gynocentric society would never allow that.
If the dad did that to her he would rightly be described as the villain. She’s the villain and this article sympathizes with her. What a messed up world we live in.
Worst patriarchy ever.
In Ontario, being common-law spouses doesn't necessarily mean having lived in the same home, the court found
Raise your hand if you’re not at all surprised that courts are beginning to give women their ex’s money, even though they were never married and had no children together. 🙋🏼‍♂️
This one even declined to sign a marriage contract. Of course she declined to sign a marriage contract, she wanted his money and she knew that if it ever were to end, she’d take him to court and get every penny she could from him!
You can’t be a strong independent woman if you’re living off of your ex.
I have bad news for you. It’s not because you are white, it’s because you’re a woman. And that bias is very well documented.
Krista Vernoff is a TV screenwriter, showrunner, executive producer and director, best known for running the medical drama Grey's Anatomy. S
When men are mean to women, it’s men’s fault. When women are mean to women, somehow it’s also men’s fault.
Female genital mutilation is a human rights abuse, but if you don’t allow your own genitals to be mutilated you’re not a man.