Alec Baldwin for President by New York Times Best-Selling Author Michael Levin
The Left lacks a leader.
Opposition to President Trump’s style and substance is widespread, online, in rallies, and in conversations.
But there’s no one individual around whom progressives can coalesce.
Why is that?
Popular, charismatic leaders like a Bill Clinton or a Barack Obama don’t come along every day.
More to the point, Democrats have an extremely narrow bench.
The public is exhausted with Hillary Clinton. She’s hardly the person to lead the progressive movement into the future.
Bernie Sanders has barely been heard from since the election.
Polls indicate that Elizabeth Warren may not even retain her Massachusetts Senate seat.
So for the Left, who’s left?
This isn’t a matter of idle speculation.
Yes, there is plenty of grassroots activity on the Democratic side.
You’ve got harassment of Republican members of Congress at their local town hall events, as Democrats take a leaf from the Tea Party’s playbook.
Tom McClintock, a conservative California congressman, needed a police escort to get out of a constituent meeting.
Impromptu rallies can sprout like flash mobs at the drop of an unpopular executive order.
Unless someone can be found to harness the energy of the anti-Trump people, there will be dismay, righteous anger, Twitter wars, and a sighing and gnashing of teeth on a national scale.
And as long as no such leader arises, the president will waltz to a second term.
So we have to ask the question: Why isn’t there an individual who speaks for the Left?
There are a few reasons.
First, the Democratic leadership did its members no favors by hoarding power.
On the national level, the Democratic National Committee all but stole the presidential nomination from Bernie Sanders. If the playing field had been level, he would have beaten Hillary Clinton easily.
I believe Sanders would have run a much more organized and effective general election campaign, and we’d be seeing Larry David parodying President Sanders on Saturday Night Live instead of Alec Baldwin spoofing Trump.
In the House, Nancy Pelosi and her cabal of fellow seventy-somethings cling to power, brushing back leadership challenges from up-and-coming Democrats, one or more of whom might have been that national leader the Left so desperately needs.
In short, the Old Guard of the Democratic Party put their own egos ahead of principle, with the result that there is no next generation of leaders on the Left.
The other problem that the Left perennially faces is that there is a wide, wide spectrum of political belief on their side of the aisle.
Republicans come in two flavors: moderate and Tea Party.
Democrats are more like Baskin-Robbins, with an extremely wide range of opinions, desires, and views.
I don’t know how Bill Clinton and Barack Obama each herded cats for eight years, but that’s what it’s like to get the Democrats to follow a leader.
If you want further proof, take a listen to talk radio.
The Reeps have had one primary radio voice for decades—Rush Limbaugh, with a deep bench—Hugh Hewitt, Michael Medved, Sean Hannity.
For the last twenty years, there has not been a single spokesperson on left-leaning talk radio capable of commanding a huge audience, because the Left is too fragmented.
You had Michael Jackson (the commentator, not the legendary singer) in Los Angeles from the 1960s to the 1990s, but Rush took away his ratings and left-oriented radio has languished ever since.
Donald Trump proves you don’t have to have a background in politics to run for office. It helps if you’re someone a lot of people admire and trust, and it helps if you’ve been a star and in people’s living rooms for decades.
So that’s why I’m proposing Alec Baldwin as the Democrats’ next presidential candidate.
If he can’t unite the Left, who can?








